Does anyone else begrudge the pressure to spend equal amounts of time and ‘special days’ with both sides of the family?
We’re under pressure to alternate Christmas Day - but I really don’t want to. My reasons for this are:
-
my parents are local, so we can walk there after breakfast, the children can sleep in their own beds, open presents, go to grandparents and then walk home after tea back to their own beds. The in laws live 100 miles away, so we’d have to stay over or spend copious time in the car.
-
my side of the family are catholic, and Christmas matters a lot. We go to mass as a family. The in laws are atheist. They celebrate Christmas in terms of the tree, presents, food etc but not the religious side. We’d miss mass, or have to excuse ourselves and go to an unfamiliar church near them.
-
perhaps this is the most sensitive, but we see my in laws twice a year at most. They never ring, they never ask after the DC. My parents have the children one day a week to help with childcare, are on call if we get stuck at work and the children are sent home sick from school, regularly buy necessities like extra clothes or suncream or silly little bits, just to help out. They are the children’s world, and to be honest I think certainly my DD would happily sell us out and move in with them!!! As such, we have a much less intense day with them, as it’s more familiar and the stakes aren’t as high. I also feel like they graft hard for our family, so deserve the quality time more. But that’s hard to actually come out and say.
-
Because we barely see the in laws, they’re virtual strangers. My SIL has 5 children and it’s a full on household. My SIL and MIL are both quite loud and intense characters, and my youngest in particular gets a bit overwhelmed and upset. Not ideal for a relaxing Christmas.
So...is it reasonable to say that actually, it might be ‘fair’ to alternate Christmas, but it’s not right for us. We’ll see them either 23rd or Boxing Day but Christmas itself is not going to happen.