Are your children’s vaccines up to date?

Set a reminder

Please or to access all these features

Paid childcare

Discuss everything related to paid childcare here, including childminders, nannies, nurseries and au pairs.

Nursery are threatening to remove my child as I questioned fees

468 replies

Girlmum1984 · 20/01/2025 14:29

My daughter turns 3 in a few weeks and we will be able to claim 30 free hours. When this happens, my consumables fee will increase from £12 a day to £29. have questioned this with management and asked for a breakdown of what this fee includes. They have listed food, nappies etc as well as a few activities (baking, PE classes, music classes). The activities listed take place twice month and so far haven’t been on the day that my child attends. All of this would never add up to £29 daily.

Unsatisfied with the response, I emailed the local council to understand how consumables fees can be issued to parents and it there were any regulations. As a result, they contacted the nursery manager and investigated. They were satisfied with the findings and basically said there are no regulations they need to follow when it comes to consumables fees and they can charge what they like. Annoying, but fine.
I have now had an official looking email from my nursery to say I have impacted the staffs mental health by making this enquiry and they are going to discuss whether our contact will be terminated as a result!
I’ve never had any issues with staff in the past and we’ve always been on friendly terms. My daughter enjoys the setting and the care they provide isn’t in question.

can they kick her out as their manager has an issue with me contacting the council about them? Thanks

OP posts:
Are your children’s vaccines up to date?
Thread gallery
8
saraclara · 20/01/2025 17:33

I think if you're happy with the nursery in general and want to keep the place, the best way forward is perhaps to explain your intention was from a place of concern about the cost and you needed some clarity which wasn't clear from their response. You didn't intend to upset / cause stress to anybody and anticipated further clarity, not an investigation

That.

They think you were deliberately out to make trouble for them. If that's not the case and you honestly only wanted clarification, then you need to grovel and make it clear that you didn't expect or want an investigation.

JimHalpertsWife · 20/01/2025 17:33

SheilaFentiman · 20/01/2025 17:27

@Schoolrunisbizarre because it is an open secret that consumables charges are top up charges, and if the LA had found that was the situation, the nursery would have to cease the charge and close, or cease offering funded hours.

It is disingenuous to talk about “nothing to hide” when nurseries are forced to collude in the government fiction that hours are fully funded.

But the same consumables used to cost £12 a day when the child was not on the 30hours free. Now they are, those same consumables are now £29!

It's disingenuous.

WolfFoxHare · 20/01/2025 17:35

Nine years ago when DS started nursery in the south east, the cost was £39 per day - not for consumables, that was the daily fee for the baby room. It seems insane to me that only nine years later, people think that £29 is a reasonable per diem for add-ons to the so-called ‘free hours’. There’s something deeply amiss with this situation.

PrincessScarlett · 20/01/2025 17:35

BloominNora · 20/01/2025 16:27

Unfortunately they are able to terminate your contract.

However, people on this thread saying that nurseries are allowed to charge are only partially correct - any charge for consumables has to be voluntary and paying the additional charge cannot be contingent on accessing the place.

So the OP could have arranged with the nursery to bring in her child's meals, snacks and drinks etc and not paid the fee - but I suspect they would have then found another reason to terminate the contract 😶

It would be interesting to know if the nursery was VAT registered given the jump in consumables charge from paid for to funded place - especially at a point where you would expect consumables to be getting cheaper (no nappies or expensive formula!) and before people jump on me and say childcare fees are VAT free - they are for the care element but nurseries can charge VAT for consumables.

https://www.eyalliance.org.uk/news/2024/02/dfe-clarifies-guidance-around-additional-early-years-charges-parents

"However, we removed the line regarding charges being voluntary in order to provide clarity to readers. This was partially based on feedback we received during our testing period with a small number of local authorities, providers and relevant bodies. If a parent is unable to pay for consumables or if a parent wishes to provide their own, then the parent and provider can discuss alternative options. This could include allowing parents to supply their own meals or nappies, or waiving or reducing the cost of meals and snacks. As set out in clause A1.33 of the guidance, such charges should not be made a condition of accessing a free place."

Also:

Nursery top-up fees in England
The government has said nurseries in England are within their rights to charge for things like nappies, wipes, food and other ‘consumables’.
However these extra consumable charges are not allowed to be ‘a condition of accessing a funded place’.
The Early Education and Childcare Statutory Guidance for Local Authorities April 2023 states providers can ‘charge for meals and snacks as part of a free entitlement place and that they can also charge for consumables such as nappies or sun cream, and for services such as trips and specialist tuition. Parents can therefore be expected to pay for these, although these charges must be voluntary for the parent’.
Nurseries must be completely transparent about any additional charges.

The DofE removed the word 'voluntary' so it is misleading to suggest that parents don't have to pay these extra fees. It states that parent and provider should discuss alternatives to the extra charge but do bear in mind that a legitimate alternative to a parent paying extra charges is that the provider decides to stop offering funded places completely so parent would then have to pay full nursery fees.

By all means challenge them if you feel they are excessive. For example, there shouldn't be a charge for nappies if a child no longer wears nappies. There shouldn't be a charge for a maths class that is not on the day a child attends etc etc.

It boils my piss that successive governments tell parents the hours are free as everyone who works in childcare knows they are not free at all. Why should any childcare setting work at less than their hourly rate. Calling it free has just resulted in parents clashing with providers as this exact situation shows.

SheilaFentiman · 20/01/2025 17:35

They don't pay the funding back when a child is off sick and they sell on the slots.

How often does this happen? I’m guessing it’s ad hoc, an existing parent calling up on the off chance of a space for an unexpected work commitment and the nursery saying that they could squeeze Katie in cos little Terence threw up yesterday?

cansu · 20/01/2025 17:36

I also think the early years sector should make it clear that they are not offering free hours.

Calochortus · 20/01/2025 17:36

Unsatisfied with the response, I emailed the local council to understand how consumables fees can be issued to parents and it there were any regulations

Why didn’t you let the Nursery know you weren’t satisfied with their response? I’m sure the Nursery could have advised if there were regulations and given more information on the consumables fees (which I agree are extremely high). While you were within your rights to do this I’d personally have tried to get a resolution with the nursery first. I’d be looking at other nurseries as it sounds that they’re perhaps looking at it that your relationship with the nursery may have broken down especially if they’re mentioning terminating your contract.

Heronwatcher · 20/01/2025 17:36

Some people here are just deliberately being stupid.

It is not legal for nurseries to top fees up. So they charge more for food and other extras. Otherwise the nursery would close or not take funded place children at all.

It works for kids because they have a nursery place and often it’s nice and close to home.
It works for parents because they get a place at a nursery and even though they get charged for the extras, it’s still less than paying full fees for a place.
It works for politicians because they can pretend that they are doing more for kids than they are.
It just about works for nurseries (who I am sure would prefer to be open and honest about top ups but that’s illegal).

It doesn’t work if one PITA parent pretends they don’t know about this and reports the nursery to the council, and then the nursery has to be put through an unnecessary investigation.

SheilaFentiman · 20/01/2025 17:37

JimHalpertsWife · 20/01/2025 17:33

But the same consumables used to cost £12 a day when the child was not on the 30hours free. Now they are, those same consumables are now £29!

It's disingenuous.

It would not be disingenuous if the nursery were allowed to call the “free” hours a subsidy (as they are) and say that now you have 30 subsidised hours a week and not 15, the amount that you pay per week on top of the subsidy is X not Y.

Schoolrunisbizarre · 20/01/2025 17:37

JimHalpertsWife · 20/01/2025 17:33

But the same consumables used to cost £12 a day when the child was not on the 30hours free. Now they are, those same consumables are now £29!

It's disingenuous.

This

Legodaisy · 20/01/2025 17:38

That said, £30 a day is extremely cheap. For a nursery that's open from 8-6 it's £3 an hour for the thing that's most precious to you to be cared for.

If your child is there 8-6 then best believe you are paying the full hourly price for the hours of 8-9am, 3-6pm, and sometimes the lunch hour too. The government funding is only ever applied for the hours 9am-3pm (at least, in my experience).

I would actually disagree that £600 a month is “really cheap”. Especially if you’re paying an
extra £150-200 on top to cover the “non-covered” “wrap-around” hours - since most working parents can’t drop off at 9am and pick up at 6.

I think for a scheme that is intended to encourage mothers back to work, asking women to pay an additional £600-800 a month is a
disgrace, and would preclude many women from being able to go back to work.

As another poster said, many nurseries are able to keep functioning with the government funding (5.88 an hour from the government for these funded children), plus maybe £10 a day consumables fee. If you’re having to charge £30 a day consumables, then maybe you’re either greedy or bad at running a business.

Cantgetausername87 · 20/01/2025 17:39

SheilaFentiman · 20/01/2025 17:35

They don't pay the funding back when a child is off sick and they sell on the slots.

How often does this happen? I’m guessing it’s ad hoc, an existing parent calling up on the off chance of a space for an unexpected work commitment and the nursery saying that they could squeeze Katie in cos little Terence threw up yesterday?

All the time! As you likely know children are constantly off sick when at nursery. And the demand is so high that when you notify of the illness, and they let you know of the isolation period (typically 5 days) they have parents biting their hands off for it and it's filled immediately

Schoolrunisbizarre · 20/01/2025 17:40

Heronwatcher · 20/01/2025 17:36

Some people here are just deliberately being stupid.

It is not legal for nurseries to top fees up. So they charge more for food and other extras. Otherwise the nursery would close or not take funded place children at all.

It works for kids because they have a nursery place and often it’s nice and close to home.
It works for parents because they get a place at a nursery and even though they get charged for the extras, it’s still less than paying full fees for a place.
It works for politicians because they can pretend that they are doing more for kids than they are.
It just about works for nurseries (who I am sure would prefer to be open and honest about top ups but that’s illegal).

It doesn’t work if one PITA parent pretends they don’t know about this and reports the nursery to the council, and then the nursery has to be put through an unnecessary investigation.

Edited

So Heron we just have to trust they're charging the correct amount for this, and we aren't allowed to query it? Not sure that questioning something is necessarily 'stupid'

SheilaFentiman · 20/01/2025 17:41

Cantgetausername87 · 20/01/2025 17:39

All the time! As you likely know children are constantly off sick when at nursery. And the demand is so high that when you notify of the illness, and they let you know of the isolation period (typically 5 days) they have parents biting their hands off for it and it's filled immediately

If you say so. Wasn’t my experience at my DCs’ nursery.

Shinyandnew1 · 20/01/2025 17:42

I think it's one of those situations where you have to weigh up the potential consequences before deciding if it is worth getting a third party involved.

This. It sounds like you are at high risk of losing your nursery place which would suggest it really wasn't worth it! I hope there are other nearby nurseries around with places that you can try-there aren't around here, they are like hens teeth.

Cantgetausername87 · 20/01/2025 17:43

Well it's very much mine! Perhaps the "free" hours are increasing demand but it's my understanding this has been in place for a very long time.
Again no need to be defensive I just think they've avoided scrutiny for some very questionable things in this sector.

lessglittermoremud · 20/01/2025 17:43

In our area nurseries are restricting when you can use the funded hours because of the shortfall in what they are being paid, you can’t use them for their busiest days etc
Our youngest has just started school so we’ve just come out of nursery care, when I realised the shortfall in funding I asked if I could voluntarily make up the difference in order to be able to use the funded hours for when we needed to use them, but was told that nurseries weren’t allowed to charge the difference
Our nursery also charged a rate for consumables £17 a day, which I paid happily because using the 30 hours ‘free’ funding dramatically decreased our childcare bill, so I saw it as still benefiting from the funding.
I think the nursery perhaps should have explained the charges a little better to you when you queried them, however involving the council and giving them the specific nursery details rather then making a general enquiry about nursery costs was a mistake.
They can withdraw your little one’s place on the basis that the relationship between parent/nursery has irreparably broken down, which will be in their t&c’s.
You may find childminders don’t charge for consumables, our local one doesn’t and you can send in packed lunches etc which may suit your needs better.

devastatedagain · 20/01/2025 17:43

OP I'm guessing this is your first child attending nursery.

As you've found out, nursery can pick and choose their clients, unlike schools, who have to take who they are allocated.

Why did you tell the council?

Edited to add parents who complain a lot take up a huge amount of the nursery managers time - another reason to choose a non-moaner as opposed to a moaner. I'm not saying you are a moaner (but they probably think you're gonna be).

SheilaFentiman · 20/01/2025 17:43

Schoolrunisbizarre · 20/01/2025 17:32

I get that Sheila, but £29 is a lot, and that may not be affordable for many.
How do you know they're definitely not swindling people? I mean, it's highly, highly unlikely, and as the LA found nothing wrong, it's not the case here seemingly. But why is it not okay to ask the question??

I don’t know how to put it any more clearly than I already have, as have many other posters.

Matilda761 · 20/01/2025 17:44

Girlmum1984 · 20/01/2025 14:29

My daughter turns 3 in a few weeks and we will be able to claim 30 free hours. When this happens, my consumables fee will increase from £12 a day to £29. have questioned this with management and asked for a breakdown of what this fee includes. They have listed food, nappies etc as well as a few activities (baking, PE classes, music classes). The activities listed take place twice month and so far haven’t been on the day that my child attends. All of this would never add up to £29 daily.

Unsatisfied with the response, I emailed the local council to understand how consumables fees can be issued to parents and it there were any regulations. As a result, they contacted the nursery manager and investigated. They were satisfied with the findings and basically said there are no regulations they need to follow when it comes to consumables fees and they can charge what they like. Annoying, but fine.
I have now had an official looking email from my nursery to say I have impacted the staffs mental health by making this enquiry and they are going to discuss whether our contact will be terminated as a result!
I’ve never had any issues with staff in the past and we’ve always been on friendly terms. My daughter enjoys the setting and the care they provide isn’t in question.

can they kick her out as their manager has an issue with me contacting the council about them? Thanks

Can you not just appreciate the huge discount you’re getting? Rather than trying to get even more money off… Everyone knows the sector is in crisis and the government funding doesn’t cover their costs. The nursery is within its rights to give your place to a more appreciative family.

SheilaFentiman · 20/01/2025 17:44

Cantgetausername87 · 20/01/2025 17:43

Well it's very much mine! Perhaps the "free" hours are increasing demand but it's my understanding this has been in place for a very long time.
Again no need to be defensive I just think they've avoided scrutiny for some very questionable things in this sector.

I am not being defensive by saying I had a different experience to you. What a strange thing to say,

littleluncheon · 20/01/2025 17:44

Once you've reported your childcare provider to the authorities, your relationship has effectively broken down.

I'm a childminder and also wouldn't keep a customer who reported me.

Schoolrunisbizarre · 20/01/2025 17:45

SheilaFentiman · 20/01/2025 17:43

I don’t know how to put it any more clearly than I already have, as have many other posters.

I understand you, I just don't agree with you. I think you're missing the nuance quite frankly.

PrincessScarlett · 20/01/2025 17:45

Schoolrunisbizarre · 20/01/2025 17:40

So Heron we just have to trust they're charging the correct amount for this, and we aren't allowed to query it? Not sure that questioning something is necessarily 'stupid'

Decent childcare settings should state in their contracts/terms and conditions exactly what extras there are with funded hours. That way, if you don't agree with the charge then you choose another childcare setting.

In my area, the funding agreement that the local authority insists the provider and parent sign to receive funded hours clearly states that there may be extra charges on top of funded hours. Although I appreciate every local authority is different.

AmyW9 · 20/01/2025 17:46

Someone has just made a similar complaint about our nursery to the LA. It was upheld, now all of the funding has been cut until they resolve it, causing a massive headache for every parent.

It's going to lead to staff redundancies, no more activities for the kids, and a period of us parents paying above the odds until it's resolved.

Nurseries are notoriously under funded, and your complaint could have caused them untold issues.