Are your children’s vaccines up to date?

Set a reminder

Please or to access all these features

Paid childcare

Discuss everything related to paid childcare here, including childminders, nannies, nurseries and au pairs.

Returning to work after second child and finding childcare impossible

55 replies

cesoir · 28/09/2010 20:58

I'm returning to work almost 14 months after the birth of my daugher. I have chosen to do this because my husband and I are struggling to live on his salary, and much like everyone else in these times, are up to our eyeballs in debt.

So I've managed to get a terrific job offer with a mid-November start, with a fair salary of £37k. I've even found a nanny who I think is great who has a net rate of £750 p/h. But then when I have to add tax, and NI, and employers NI I have to pay her £47 a month more than I earn!!!!

If I put them both in nursery I'm pretty much taking home £300 BEFORE my travel and lunch. It's not even worth the heartache.

How do people do this??? I 'm failing to see any light at the end of the tunnel other than to turn the job down, and I worked so so hard to get it.

My son is nearly 4 and attends the local school from 9-11.30 every morning and until end of day for 1 day. My 13 month daughter is home with me.

I've thought about getting an au pair but I've read that they can't look after the children for longer than 5 hours at a time, and that they cannot have sole charge of children under 2. And yet, I see lots of positions advertising au pair positions with toddlers.

Also, I've been looking at aupair.com and seen some candidates that seem perfect. Does anyone have any experience of this site? Is it a reputable way to find an au pair? What checks do I need to do if I choose to not go through any agency?

So many questions! Does anybody have any advice? xxxxxxxx

OP posts:
Are your children’s vaccines up to date?
nannyl · 28/09/2010 22:23

good point nannomum, so could have £650ish spare after working

of course you could use both sets of £243 to pay a childminder or nursery as well, but the 1st £500 a month is "free"(ish)

DebiTheScot · 28/09/2010 22:28

A childminder could be a good option as they should be able to be flexible and able to reduce the hours next year when your son is at school.
A nursery could be a pain unless they would do the school pick up/drop off.

Don't forget you and your partner can both claim childcare vouchers. Although aren't they stopping them in a couple of years?

bigchris · 28/09/2010 22:28

Yes you are just eligible for childcare credits etc because you earn under 40 k
you need to look at entitledto.com to work out what tax credits you can get
a nursery might be better
i'd definitely go back if I were you
the longterm gain outweighs the shorterm

SylvanianFamily · 28/09/2010 22:29

Cms, you,ll need to ask around about vacancies. The listings are rarely complete.

howdidthishappenthen · 28/09/2010 22:36

Have you thought of repositioning the costs in your mind as 50% attributable to your DH, and 50% attributable to you? I know in real life family budgeting terms it makes absolutely no difference, but in terms of getting your head around the factors at play in deciding to/to not to go back to work, it's 'fairer' to think of your responsibility for these costs as being equal to DH in so far as it you both work,you both contribute to childcare. Not sure if my point is a: clear,or b: relevant but trying to help :-)

Mtorun · 29/09/2010 01:11

Here is another option. If you cant find childminder for 5 days you can combine childminder and nanny. Find out how many days a childminder can take your kids and get a nanny for the remaining days? And yes you and ur husband can claim vouchers( I think they were planing to stop from 2012 if im not wrong).

I would def. work. Especially, if you find a job you like doing.

Good luck with whatever you decide.

NickOfTime · 29/09/2010 04:19

i've only ever hired nannys on contracts tbh - i hadn't realised there was another way to do it Blush

Blondeshavemorefun · 29/09/2010 07:27

vouchers are stopping in 2012? Shock

StarExpat · 29/09/2010 09:38

What? Why? Is this definite? :(
January 2012?

DebiTheScot · 29/09/2010 13:07

I think it was decided by labour so don't know if it's still happening. There was also something about when you can sign up for the vouchers, no new people after 2010 rings a bell but I could be wrong.
Worth investigating though.

StillSquiffy · 29/09/2010 13:27

It is depressing though, isn't it. £650 per month = £3.25 net per hour - less than half what the nanny earns.... and when you take off travel costs to/from work, lunch and the odd latte....

....and if the childcare vouchers go then that means net earnings of 82p an hour before th ecosts of workign are taken into account.

I did a similar calc for my staff taking into account things like need for business attire, tights, etc and the results were quite shocking. We estimated that staff who wanted to maintain at least outward appearance of normality relative to other staff (ie available to work flexibly on the odd evening, use staff canteen not packed lunches, participate in 'getting the coffees in', etc) and who worked within M25 (where nanny costs are high) had a breakeven salary requirement of £50,500.

No wonder I always feel broke and it's the nanny not me who is talking about getting a new car....

But, as others have said, it is only for a short period of time. Once the kids are at school it should get much easier.

HarrietTheSpy · 29/09/2010 13:33

OP: What hours do you work and can you do any time from home?

We use a nursery/school/after school combo which includes an AP and financially it works for us. Remember that there are always contingencies to plan for as well, when you are thinking how much you can assume in 'fixed costs.'

If a childminder can't do the hours your need and take both of your children, this combo could work for you too. You also need to have time to make sure you've recruited the right au pair and can invest in some supervision time when they're first starting. AND you need to think of the implications of having someone live with you who is not a professional and has expectations of YOU in various areas (some entertainment, help assimilating, etc).

Can your son possibly pick up another day or two full day in the school? If not,it MIGHT well be a bit too much time for an AP. Definitely don't hire an AP for full time care for the younger one, you won't relax leaving the house each day however much cheaper it is than the nanny.

My advice is to think about your schedule and run the numbers on a nursery, your older DCs preschool and an au pair and see how it compares to the CM and whether you can find one that works on yoru schedule.

cece · 29/09/2010 14:21

In the past I have had various arrangements for childcare.

TBH I have only used CMs but have had two cm (one for each child) at times. I have also had differnet cm on different days in the past too.

It all works out in the end.

Not sure about the going rate where you are but I curently pay £5 per hour for my 16 month and then for before and after school care I pay £5 per hour for two children. (I have three kids - 2 at school and I preschool)

So 7.30am - 5pm costs me about £55/60 per day for three children. (2 at school)

Katy1368 · 29/09/2010 17:51

Okay I employ a nanny who costs me gross about £16000 a year - def offer a gross salary. I earn about £40000 a year so it makes it worth it for me but I didn't go through nanny agencies - the commision they charge is eye watering! I advertised privately and was just very thorough in checking her references out. My current nanny is a little younger (20) and only on her 3rd job so therefore a little cheaper. Having said that I also offered her a "buyout" deal of a gross monthly salary as opposed to hourly rates which bought down the costs a little and she was willing to accept. Because she was less experienced than other nannies who have been at it for years she was somewhere between a child minder and nanny I guess,but she has worked out to be fab.Au Pairs should not do long hours sole charge jobs - they are basically teenage girls who may have had little or no training in childcare so there are no guarantees even if they sound fab.

mumtorobbie · 29/09/2010 18:06

Jeez, £37k a 'fair' salary? You should try doing it on £20k!

tokengirl · 01/10/2010 13:49

childcare vouchers are deducted from salary - you only get the tax break, not the whole money. So your costs are lower but so's your salary. Not sure if that was clear from the responses on here

lowrib · 01/10/2010 14:38

There are some fantastic CMs out there - DS has been to two brilliant CMs (one in London, one in Eastbourne where we are now).

We found both of them through www.childcare.co.uk

lowrib · 01/10/2010 14:41

Oh sorry, I see you've already looked there. Have you contacted any of them to see if they have places? It's possible their profiles might be out of date maybe?

When we were in London we did have to travel a bit to find the right CM (in Islington / Finsbury Park) but it was worth it as she was just brilliant.

Ripeberry · 01/10/2010 17:23

You need to contact each CM to get the latest vacancies.

nosferatu · 05/10/2010 11:32

I agree with you - it's terrible and I have been stuck at home for 7 years no for the same reason. It hurts me how expensive it is.
In response to your question- is your nanny expensive?

( I don't work full time so I wouldn't know....excuse my ignorance.

Another point- know a lot of ffriends who were au-pairs and they used to look after 2-3 kids at the time who were definitely smaller then 2. I think you should go for it if you have room- my friends has recently hired one and she pays her 70£ a week for 2 kids - she has weekends and evenings free. She has hired her from an independent web site in Sweden so she is not paying any agencies.

I would do it but I live in a flat so there wouldn't be enough room.

annh · 05/10/2010 11:42

Oh please do not use an aupair for a 13 month old! Of course people do it but I wonder what thought process they go through to reach the conclusion that someone with very limited childcare experience, possibly still a teenager themselves, who is being paid perhaps £70 a week, is providing suitable care for their child?

nosferatu · 05/10/2010 12:03

Sure but they don't have to have limiting experience- in some countries they can financially struggle or come to learn english -you might even get a qualified teacher.
( which my friend was hen she came here as an au pair)

I suppose you choose and set your criteria but I agree I wouldn't pick a teeenager.

StillSquiffy · 05/10/2010 15:00

I agree - it depends on the au pair themselves.

My new one has a BSc in early years and is doing an MA in Autism studies. He spent the summer running a children's club and is 26. And he is happy to work for £80 a week (he knows that being in the UK for 2 years and becoming fluent in English and having childcare experience will be really useful to his CV). Whilst my DCs aren't babies or even toddlers now I wouldn't hesitate to trust him with them (as I trusted my previous two).

AuntyEWA · 08/10/2010 14:45

Hi,

I would look at a childminder - we have a brilliant, very flexible CM who has looked after my daughter since she was five months old. She charges £200 a week for 40 hours a week. There's also a 5% discount for a second child. We absolutely adore her, not least because my OH is a musician and so we don't actually use her full time. We pay £50 a day, or £5 an hour. In my case I earn more than OH (because he's a musician of course) and so the calculation becomes whether or not it's worth OH working that day, rather than me. We're in Woodford, but another good option for us (if we'd needed FT care) would have been one of the Buffer Bear nurseries, which are not for profit. I think I checked out the Waterloo one, as I could have taken Mog there before work and picked her up afterwards, and still have had a decent working day as it was so close to the office, and it was around £250 a week for 40 hours.

If only I could persuade OH to get an office job ;)

Rollergirl1 · 08/10/2010 21:43

It's such a toughie, weighing up if it is actually worth going back to work. I too went back to work 14 months after my second child, but only 3 days a week (as I did after my 1st). My full-time salary is just a little over yours but I only receive 3/5 of it. I explored the nanny route and quite quickly discovered that it was too expensive to warrant me going back a 2nd time. So I continued with the nursery that DD had been attending, 3 days a week for both of them. I worked out that after the childcare costs I probably had about £400 spare a month. Once you factor in the travelling, parking, etc I probably didn't get left with a lot. But I went back to work more for keeping my hand in, and keeping my own sanity rather than the financial benefit.

Now DD is at school and both the kids are with a Childminder. The costs at the moment are about the same as Nursery as DD is mornings only until Jan. But from then they will drop significantly and then when DS goes to Pre-school they will drop even more.

If going back to work is important to you then I would say do it and take the hit financially untill DS starts school next September when your childcare costs will reduce significantly.

The only other thing I will say is getting myself and 2 children out the door by 8oclock 3 days a week is hellish. But I still prefer it over being a SAHM. No offence to SAHM's though. Smile

Swipe left for the next trending thread