Hmmm.
In my experience some midwives are 'anti-doula' because they are defensive about their practice.
They want to give women emotional support and provide woman-centred care, but they are so bound up with the protocol of the hospital, overburdened by having too many people to care for, and tied up with writing detailed notes, that all but the most capable and experienced struggle to do this.
In my experience most midwives are providing medically focused care, except those that are working in birth centres with a strong ethos of physiological birth.
If anyone quibbles with your decision again refer them to the Cochrane review of the benefits of continuous care in labour which says:
in general, continuous intrapartum support was associated with greater benefits when the provider was not a member of the hospital staff
And if continue to quibble then tell them to fuck off.
(rest of the summary below)
Sixteen trials involving 13,391 women met inclusion criteria and provided usable outcome data. Primary comparison: women who had continuous intrapartum support were likely to have a slightly shorter labour, were more likely to have a spontaneous vaginal birth and less likely to have intrapartum analgesia or to report dissatisfaction with their childbirth experiences. Subgroup analyses: in general, continuous intrapartum support was associated with greater benefits when the provider was not a member of the hospital staff, when it began early in labour and in settings in which epidural analgesia was not routinely available.
Authors' conclusions