Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Childbirth

Share experiences and get support around labour, birth and recovery.

Low intervention - homebirth

606 replies

thismonthsfad · 18/01/2026 17:47

Hi. Just wondering if any ladies are currently pregnant and planning a homebirth?

I have self referred and noted on my form that I’ll be having a homebirth. I have my first booking appointment in 2 weeks.

Just looking for some positive stories on the process so far and how to navigate avoiding landing on the intervention conveyor belt.

not looking for opinions from people who are against homebirth/haven’t experienced it

OP posts:
Thread gallery
6
thismonthsfad · 20/01/2026 12:34

SleeplessInWherever · 20/01/2026 12:26

I’d say any elevation in risk would be unacceptable, for me.

You have a higher risk of dying in a car crash - do you avoid driving as this would technically be an 'unacceptable risk' for you?

OP posts:
SoIMO · 20/01/2026 12:34

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

SleeplessInWherever · 20/01/2026 12:35

thismonthsfad · 20/01/2026 12:32

You've completely misunderstood that no intervention is 100% risk free! I guess 'there's probably very little anyone can sensible say to you' ☺️

You’re not actually explaining anything. You know that, right?

When the very clear question is “why would you have a midwife there who can’t touch you and therefore can’t as quickly determine any issues?”

Your answer appears to be “because I can 🤷🏻‍♀️.”

SleeplessInWherever · 20/01/2026 12:37

thismonthsfad · 20/01/2026 12:34

You have a higher risk of dying in a car crash - do you avoid driving as this would technically be an 'unacceptable risk' for you?

What you’re talking about is the equivalent of driving a car, but not wearing a seatbelt, because you’ve researched them.

Or having an accident, and not allowing a paramedic to strap you to a board because it’s your broken back and you know it best.

They’re both unacceptable additional risks.

SoIMO · 20/01/2026 12:37

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

SoIMO · 20/01/2026 12:39

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

LoveHearts69 · 20/01/2026 12:42

Lots of women even in hospital births decline vaginal examinations for various reasons including SA, trauma etc, I know quite a few women who have done. Why is this angering everyone so much?! Aren’t most home births/low risk births majority ‘hands off’ unless necessary anyway?! Vaginal examinations can come with their own increased risk of infection so I don’t think the OP is being wildly unreasonable.

thismonthsfad · 20/01/2026 12:44

SleeplessInWherever · 20/01/2026 12:37

What you’re talking about is the equivalent of driving a car, but not wearing a seatbelt, because you’ve researched them.

Or having an accident, and not allowing a paramedic to strap you to a board because it’s your broken back and you know it best.

They’re both unacceptable additional risks.

Nope! I’m referring to overall risk. The annual risk of dying in a car crash is roughly 0.015%, which is actually higher than the risk of many of the adverse outcomes that are often emphasised in childbirth discussions. Risk exists everywhere; the key point is proportionality and informed choice.

OP posts:
thismonthsfad · 20/01/2026 12:47

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

100% this! I don't want my labour to be constantly interrupted. Sadly one of my friends who has had 3 children (2 HB, 1 Hospital) experienced relentless interruption during her labour, her baby caught an infection from the VE's. She also contributes his health issues to the excesses examinations and the fact that she was constantly interrupted which in her words 'effed her off' as she just wanted to be left alone.

OP posts:
SoIMO · 20/01/2026 12:49

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

SleeplessInWherever · 20/01/2026 12:50

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

In terms of risk, I think we all make risk taking decisions every day. I drive a car, I’ve got a log fire, childbirth carries risk.

I think adding additional risk to those decisions isn’t sensible. So I wouldn’t drive a car without a seatbelt, I wouldn’t climb Everest without oxygen, I wouldn’t give birth and not allow a medical professional to option to touch me if required.

Mojo doesn’t come into it, I’m more comfortable without the safety of a seatbelt, I still wear one. Midwifes are I guess in this case, seatbelts and safety features 😂

thismonthsfad · 20/01/2026 12:52

SleeplessInWherever · 20/01/2026 12:50

In terms of risk, I think we all make risk taking decisions every day. I drive a car, I’ve got a log fire, childbirth carries risk.

I think adding additional risk to those decisions isn’t sensible. So I wouldn’t drive a car without a seatbelt, I wouldn’t climb Everest without oxygen, I wouldn’t give birth and not allow a medical professional to option to touch me if required.

Mojo doesn’t come into it, I’m more comfortable without the safety of a seatbelt, I still wear one. Midwifes are I guess in this case, seatbelts and safety features 😂

But you're ignoring the fact that many interventions come with additional risks. You are assuming that the VE's for example are completely risk free and that not having them poses more of a risk which simply is not true.

OP posts:
SoIMO · 20/01/2026 13:03

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

SoIMO · 20/01/2026 13:04

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

ThatMrsM · 20/01/2026 13:38

thismonthsfad · 20/01/2026 09:53

The only scan I am opting out of is the first scan, not the later one. I don't claim to 'know everything', I just mentioned that I have done my research (and a lot of it) because several people keep posting that I 'should get the 12 week scan' and that I am 'putting my baby at risk'. I have to respond to this somehow and I am dammed if I do, dammed if I don't.

I cannot share my research on here because firstly there's too much of it and secondly I believe each person needs to find their own path with researching what individual care is best for them. I have signposted a good starting point of aims.org.uk - if you start there, it will lead you to further resources - it's an interesting rabbit hole to go down!

I've had a little look on Aims and I personally wouldn't trust all of it.
This article https://www.aims.org.uk/journal/item/who-says-ultrasound-is-safe#4
references a study in Helsinki stating that there were only miscarriages in the scanned group. If you look at the actual journal you will see that's not true - perinatal mortality was significantly lower in the scanned group. https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PII0140-6736(90)91941-3/fulltext

Sorry, not trying to be difficult but I'm a scientist and I always have to look into the original references in these types of articles. All I would say if be careful what you read (unless it's in a peer-reviewed journal!)

Who says ultrasound is safe? | AIMS

https://www.aims.org.uk/journal/item/who-says-ultrasound-is-safe#4

SoIMO · 20/01/2026 13:47

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

Sleepygrumpyandnothappy · 20/01/2026 14:02

OP will you accept screening for low PAPP-A?

thismonthsfad · 20/01/2026 14:40

Sleepygrumpyandnothappy · 20/01/2026 14:02

OP will you accept screening for low PAPP-A?

Low PAPP-A isn’t a diagnosis in itself; it’s a biochemical marker that only appears as part of combined screening. As I’m declining the first scan, I won’t be receiving PAPP-A results.

The absolute risks remain small and most outcomes women worry about are still well under 1%, and the majority of pregnancies with low PAPP-A are completely normal.

I am sure even with this response someone is going to label me something or give their opinion 🤣

OP posts:
Unorganisedchaos2 · 20/01/2026 14:44

I planned a HB with DD; my area has an excellent HB department and they even agreed for me to try even though I was high risk due to BMI.

Unfortunately I had to go to hospital as I had meconium in my waters but I don't regret trying for a HB and I was able to pass most of the early stages at home which was so calm (and in hindsight the last time I was alone for a long time!), baby was born only a couple of hours after arriving at hospital.

I have a friend who had a HB with her second and she had a great experience, they are much more hands off generally and if you want minimal interventions they'll support that. I think being in your own environment where you feel comfortable can make a huge difference so definitely go for it

Babyboomtastic · 20/01/2026 15:15

thismonthsfad · 20/01/2026 11:19

Can you tell me how it shows a 'degree of woo science' - I struggle to understand how you've come to this (slightly ignorant) conclusion when you have zero idea on the research that I have undertaken.

The mere fact that you talk about the 'pros and cons' of the 12 week scan, when there are zero cons, and just vague references by you to the safety of them 'being sketchy' (it's not) does whatever you are believing is not mainstream science, which falls firmly and unequivocally on the side of the scan being 100% safe.

Have it, don't have it, whatever. But it day that is might not be safe IS woo, and it does raise flags about what other woo you believe.

thismonthsfad · 20/01/2026 15:29

Babyboomtastic · 20/01/2026 15:15

The mere fact that you talk about the 'pros and cons' of the 12 week scan, when there are zero cons, and just vague references by you to the safety of them 'being sketchy' (it's not) does whatever you are believing is not mainstream science, which falls firmly and unequivocally on the side of the scan being 100% safe.

Have it, don't have it, whatever. But it day that is might not be safe IS woo, and it does raise flags about what other woo you believe.

I disagree that there are “zero cons.” Every screening test has benefits and limitations, including false positives, anxiety, and follow-on interventions. Acknowledging that is not anti-science — it’s how informed consent works. Pros/cons/benefits/risks - choose whatever language you’re comfortable with.

I’ve made an educated decision for my own pregnancy, and I’m comfortable with it. I’m not interested in having my intelligence or motives questioned.

OP posts:
OhDear111 · 20/01/2026 16:05

Risking your own life by climbing Everest or risky sport is fine. No life of a baby involved. Selfish - absolutely.

SoIMO · 20/01/2026 16:31

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

Angelil · 20/01/2026 17:31

Babyboomtastic · 20/01/2026 10:12

Something we agree on!
It's nice if that level of postnatal help was offered, but staying at home waiting for the NHS appointments was annoying enough.

You don’t stay at home waiting; you know when they will arrive.

Angelil · 20/01/2026 17:31

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

As mentioned, I had my first baby in hospital as it was what I wanted. I never felt pressured to have a home birth.

Swipe left for the next trending thread