Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Childbirth

Share experiences and get support around labour, birth and recovery.

Low intervention - homebirth

606 replies

thismonthsfad · 18/01/2026 17:47

Hi. Just wondering if any ladies are currently pregnant and planning a homebirth?

I have self referred and noted on my form that I’ll be having a homebirth. I have my first booking appointment in 2 weeks.

Just looking for some positive stories on the process so far and how to navigate avoiding landing on the intervention conveyor belt.

not looking for opinions from people who are against homebirth/haven’t experienced it

OP posts:
Thread gallery
6
LittleLapwing · 18/01/2026 21:20

OP I really hope it all goes well for you 💕

LoveHearts69 · 18/01/2026 21:20

No problem, I honestly think you’ve got the right mindset and hope it all goes well! ❤️

As for all the ‘what if’ comments… I initially didn’t think I wanted a home birth with #1 but when I sat down with the homebirth midwife and talked through all my concerns I was surprised at just how equipped they’d be! Just some examples - when you go into labour they immediately set up a resus station for baby just in case they need it and they also carry oxygen for you. In the event of of a PPH they carry an injection to slow the bleeding until you can get to hospital too. I don’t think many people realise just how equipped they are…you mention wanting a homebirth and they act like you’re choosing to free birth in a barn 🤣

Massive good luck though, you do sound like you’ve done your research and really care about your baby ❤️

Bornathome · 18/01/2026 21:24

thismonthsfad · 18/01/2026 20:39

WOW WOW WOW! This has made me smile, thank you so much for sharing this with me! I am the type of person that when in pain/uncomfortable, I like to be alone and untouched. I am also an introvert so not good with being the centre of attention, I like to quietly deal with things myself.

Thank you for sharing your beautiful homebirth experiences with me, reading this has honestly made my night (I was getting a bit fed up with the negative comments on here) but this has honestly superseded all of that x

Aw you're so welcome, I love to spread the home birth love. We sound very similar I don't like to be centre of attention either I think that's why I struggled with number 2. I was too in my head.

I'm sure you're already on it but I would recommend a hypnobirthing course. I did the positive birth company one and loved learning all about the science around birth and hormones and then the techniques to stay calm so it can all unfold as designed. It was fascinating and I was shocked I hadn't been taught it in school.

Tbh reading your replies you seem to be really well informed already and your husband sounds supportive so I reckon you'll do great.

Ignore all the hate, unfortunately many woman are very traumised by their births and as a way to make it make sense they need to have a story about how the hospital saved them/their baby when in fact if they'd stayed home (and educated themselves before) it probably would have happened as nature intended.

ToKittyornottoKitty · 18/01/2026 21:28

thismonthsfad · 18/01/2026 21:13

at the risk of getting pilled on again - the research on the safety of early scanning is sketchy. I would recommend the book by AIMS and visiting aims.org for more info.

No, it isn’t sketchy.

Tippexy · 18/01/2026 21:33

thismonthsfad · 18/01/2026 21:13

at the risk of getting pilled on again - the research on the safety of early scanning is sketchy. I would recommend the book by AIMS and visiting aims.org for more info.

This simply isn’t true.

You are wrong.

Where are you getting your misinformation from?

UncleTed · 18/01/2026 21:37

NOT PLANNED but my 2nd was a home birth. It happened because of my long, drawn out experience with my first. I went to midwife led unit—36 hours of labour ending in blue light transfer to medical maternity at a different hospital for episiotomy and forceps delivery. We both survived, a success. I had been hoping for no interventions but was so grateful to medical staff for helping my baby out (the reason he was stuck was because he was coming out forehead first with head size in the 90th percentile).
So with my 2nd I waited and waited (about 12 hours) until I was certain she was near, but we were heading straight to medical maternity unit. She was born at home, literally as we were heading out the door to go to hospital. Obviously not what I planned. Emergency response were there within minutes, ambulance within 10, and midwife after about half an hour. Midwife stayed with us at home, delivered placenta, made sure baby and I were ok and stitched me up at home. Did give us the option to go into hospital but I did not want to. I was in hospital a week(with no sleep) with baby 1 and it was sooooo lovely to be at home with baby number two even if it was extremely messy and unplanned.
Hope it all goes smoothly for you @thismonthsfad.

Tippexy · 18/01/2026 21:37

You are confusing the standard 12 week NHS scan, and the proliferation of private ‘early scan’ providers. The research on the safety of the 12 week scan is absolutely sound. It is concerning that you have decided you don’t need it, when it is in your baby’s best interests that you attend. It also shows that you don’t really understand ‘the research’ or how to critically analyse what you’re reading.

ToKittyornottoKitty · 18/01/2026 21:37

thismonthsfad · 18/01/2026 21:13

at the risk of getting pilled on again - the research on the safety of early scanning is sketchy. I would recommend the book by AIMS and visiting aims.org for more info.

Why have you even shared this website? It’s not at all related to what you are talking about. No wonder you’ve got no clue

DappledThings · 18/01/2026 21:43

ToKittyornottoKitty · 18/01/2026 21:37

Why have you even shared this website? It’s not at all related to what you are talking about. No wonder you’ve got no clue

She meant aims.org.uk. Very different to aims.org.

Although having said that a search for tbe word scan on aims.org.uk doesn't bring up any results.

Room12 · 18/01/2026 21:45

thismonthsfad · 18/01/2026 19:36

I didn't say that midwives won't be in the room, I said that I am happy to be observed, meaning that I want handsoff care! And I very much doubt this article mentions the study that was conducted that shows that homebirthing is just as safe as hospital births.

And if the hands off care means an issue with you/the baby is missed, you're cool with that?

Room12 · 18/01/2026 21:47

Tippexy · 18/01/2026 21:37

You are confusing the standard 12 week NHS scan, and the proliferation of private ‘early scan’ providers. The research on the safety of the 12 week scan is absolutely sound. It is concerning that you have decided you don’t need it, when it is in your baby’s best interests that you attend. It also shows that you don’t really understand ‘the research’ or how to critically analyse what you’re reading.

I actually wonder if this is a troll thread. Especially when combined with the username. It's just too much of a stereotype - next she'll be telling us we wouldn't vaccinate if we'd "done the research"...

VikaOlson · 18/01/2026 21:50

Room12 · 18/01/2026 21:45

And if the hands off care means an issue with you/the baby is missed, you're cool with that?

What issues are you thinking of?

Sleepygrumpyandnothappy · 18/01/2026 21:51

DappledThings · 18/01/2026 21:43

She meant aims.org.uk. Very different to aims.org.

Although having said that a search for tbe word scan on aims.org.uk doesn't bring up any results.

https://www.aims.org.uk/journal/item/ultrasound-weighing-the-propaganda-against-the-facts

It’s tin-foil territory.

Ultrasound - weighing the propaganda against the facts | AIMS

https://www.aims.org.uk/journal/item/ultrasound-weighing-the-propaganda-against-the-facts

SoIMO · 18/01/2026 21:54

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

thismonthsfad · 18/01/2026 21:55

Tippexy · 18/01/2026 21:33

This simply isn’t true.

You are wrong.

Where are you getting your misinformation from?

aims.org.uk - if it's wrong feel free to report them...!

OP posts:
ToKittyornottoKitty · 18/01/2026 21:55

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

The website she shared was a religious one. And she is wrong

Tippexy · 18/01/2026 21:56

To be fair to the OP, when I am researching issues to do with technology, I too think it’s best to focus my research on a collection of methodologically shaky 28-36 year old studies!

thismonthsfad · 18/01/2026 21:57

ToKittyornottoKitty · 18/01/2026 21:37

Why have you even shared this website? It’s not at all related to what you are talking about. No wonder you’ve got no clue

because someone asked me??

OP posts:
ToKittyornottoKitty · 18/01/2026 21:57

thismonthsfad · 18/01/2026 21:57

because someone asked me??

You shared the wrong website, you said aims.org which is a weird religious website which is why I was confused.

Room12 · 18/01/2026 21:58

VikaOlson · 18/01/2026 21:50

What issues are you thinking of?

One mentioned above was pushing before full dilation. I imagine that condition where the cord comes out of the uterus would be another. Anything affecting the baby's heartbeat. I'm not a midwife, but I don't imagine they generally prefer to be hands on for fun, there will be safety reasons.

thismonthsfad · 18/01/2026 21:59

DappledThings · 18/01/2026 21:43

She meant aims.org.uk. Very different to aims.org.

Although having said that a search for tbe word scan on aims.org.uk doesn't bring up any results.

There's a lot of material referencing scanning and ultrasound technology on that website. However, there are other resources if you do want to look further. AIMs is a good starting point.

OP posts:
Tippexy · 18/01/2026 22:00

For any pregnant women who may be concerned reading this thread:

There is no evidence that having a vaginal or an abdominal scan will cause a miscarriage or harm your baby. Having a scan does not put you or your baby at risk.

It is scaremongering and false to suggest otherwise.

By all means - do your research - but this should consist of speaking with your midwife, your GP, your consultant, and the NHS website.

thismonthsfad · 18/01/2026 22:01

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

Exactly this - they are an organisation advocating for a safer working environment for midwives and a safer birthing environment for women. I don't understand why anyone would be against that...

OP posts:
SoIMO · 18/01/2026 22:01

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

thismonthsfad · 18/01/2026 22:02

ToKittyornottoKitty · 18/01/2026 21:57

You shared the wrong website, you said aims.org which is a weird religious website which is why I was confused.

that was a typo!

OP posts:
Swipe left for the next trending thread