Labyrinth, I was talking about this on MN before pretty much anyone else. I know my shit. Like really know my stuff on this subject.
I got a CS agreed in principle before getting pregnant which even know is pretty unusual and unheard of. I chose to go where I did because they had a pro-woman centred care approach, rather than a pro-elcs one. Indeed the midwives who pushed it through for me were very much pro-natural birth but supported me 100%. They got where my head was because of their experience. I was given an actual date when I was 16 weeks.
Despite this, all the research and information I've read on the subject, still means I do think your age / when you want to get pregnant are particularly relevant here because of how risk stacks. If you are in your 20s and thinking like this, I don't think its necessarily clinically ethical to treat women the same as those in their late 30s because of the risk of having more multiple pregnancies. Women having children later will have fewer children and more likely to have complications in childbirth. I think if you want to go for it younger then you have to understand the difference in risk and might not be appropriate in the same way and reach a higher threshold of clinical need based on your mental health, because the physical risks aren't there unless you have other health considerations. Its about understanding risk in minute detail and how it stacks on an individual level. The politics of poor maternity care are an entirely different debate (again one I've made a point of for many years, and even said on MN there was an institutional level crisis across maternity services in the uk before any damn newspaper or report was saying it).
As I said in my previous post, I think there should be a better carepath way for women to talk about vb v cs BEFORE getting pregnant to properly discuss this in a neutral way. Unfortunately there is still a huge amount of ideology and I actually think, increasing levels of fallacy around the subject, which has gone past where it probably should have. This should principally be based / prioritised on clinical need - which includes mental health. I know here are now some places doing birth choice clinics but demand is so high that women who aren't pregnant / arent intending to immediately are regarded such low priority they don't get seen. I think perhaps now, because there is so much more awareness of the subject, I would never have had DS because I would never have got an appointment with someone before getting pregnant and my issues were so severe I wouldn't have done that.
When I started talking about this subject on MN there were no clinics for childbirth fear out there. When I first started out exploring the subject the NICE guidelines didn't even acknowledge tokophobia. It was unheard of. It was taboo. I spoke about it and pushed for changes on the guidance as they didn't reflect actual risks - there was a blogger Pauline Hull who did a lot of campaigning on this. Even then, after this had changed when I was ready to try myself a couple of years later, I literally wrote to someone who was researching the subject out of desparation who had some knowledge of the subject. There was no one at all in the North West other than them in the NHS and my only other alternative was to go private in London which simply wasn't viable due to where I lived (there are now private facilities in Liverpool I believe).
I still find it deeply frustrating that my notes tick the box for an ELCS on maternal request not for mental health. The person who helped me most wrote in capital letters across my notes that it was for mental health. I get the impression they stuck their neck out for me and it was somewhat controversial at the hospital. They left before I had my son and have subsequently done a lot for birth rights. I was told by one of my midwives that my case had struck something of a nerve.
I learnt a hell of a lot about the subject. I've helped a lot of people on here in the past. I only pop by in this section every now and again now.
So no, I'm not a professional but I really had to fight in ways that people now don't because I campaigned on this over a decade ago. Even my GP said I knew far more about this and had better understanding of risk, care pathways and had good knowledge on the research that had been done without being blinkered about it.
If you would like to check my posting history in the childbirth section on this subject, go use the advanced search. I don't think a vb is right for everyone. But I also don't think an elcs is and I think people are being pushed for them as a substitute for poor care (which tends to shit on those least able to advocate for themselves - who also tend to often be those who need this support and care pathway most). Sadly talking about most subjects has become much more obsessed with black and white thinking rather than case by case thoughtful consideration and weighing up of issues though
So if you want to question my credibility as just someone posting bollocks on the internet, I suggest you go away and check what I've been saying for goddam years. (And when I said it and whats changed since).
I am not just some plopper who knows fuck all. I have spent hours and hours sifting through research papers both for and against on the subject.