WARNING LONG POST
HI everyone, thanks so much for all your posts they have really helped. I have looked at the links and have done a lot more research since then. Both DH and I are engineers by training so are used to taking statistics by the throat! I think if I had seen the research previously I may well have been more worried about a hospital birth last time than I was, actually
Have also found the stats for my area and hospital, not surprisingly the lowest figures for HB in the north west (highest year was 2% of births), so it appears to me that this is probably something that is never actively encouraged as part of either hospital official or unofficial policy. So I am not surprised now that the consultant tried to scare me off it despite both pregnancies being 100% fine with no complications whatsoever.
Last time according to the scan date I was two weeks overdue. However they had put the date FORWARD by 11 days at the scan, so according to the original date, I was only 3 days overdue. I never believed the date and argued until I was blue in the face from 20 weeks onwards that even with a rudimentary knowledge of biology I could not have conceived at that time. They would not change the date back though. So I was not convinced about the induction but gave in when the consultant said that there was a high risk of still birth if I did not have it. That was the point at which my BP went up, for the first and ONLY time in my whole life. I'd say I was just stressed at being pressganged!
During the labour I was wired to the max with the drip, the continuous monitor, lying on my back for 24 hours whilst they tried to convince my DS that he really did want to be born! It set off a chain reaction which ended in theatre one ventouse push from a CS. Throughout labour I had four midwives in succession, each one popped in every half hour on average as the labour suite was so busy they were looking after about three women each.
I was put on the ward within half an hour of delivering and my DH was sent home immediately and hadn't even held the baby, as he wasn't allowed on the ward during the night. No one checked on me at all and I was left with no assistance until I managed to snag an auxillary at 10am the next morning to pull the curtains and help me out of bed and out of my theatre gown.
I discharged myself at 2pm and got home with a huge sigh of relief at 2:15pm - the baby was only 9 hours old at this point. The relief I felt at having a shower in my own bathroom, having a cup of tea and a sleep in peace and quiet (even a new baby is quiet compared to the ward I was on!) made me convinced that this time home is the place for me! I am convinced that this traumatic experience contributed to my lack of bonding with my lovely DS for weeks after the birth, plus pretty severe PND.
Must say though, all the MWs were wonderful, just stupidly overworked and far too few of them. I nearly laughed out loud when the consultant said I would only have ONE at home - last time I had about 0.25 of a midwife I reckon!
I am seeing MW tomorrow for regular check up, so I think I will tell her how offputting the consultant was. I would like to ask her if that was her intention, and whether she believes that it is best not to have a HB. I don't want to go against the advice of the experts (I'd be mightily miffed if someone told me they knew my job better than me!) but I will need a lot of convincing that the hospital is the best place for me given my experience last time.
You've all given me loads of things to think about and have also given me lots of ammunition to use if I need to. Atmm I think that I will probably stay booked on the HB but reserve the option to change my mind if anything looks remotely dodgy. We are only ten mins from the hospital in any case. And as I reminded DH, most women have hospital BIRTHS but home LABOURS - where you have no pain relief and no one monitoring you at all, so I would actually be better off for the vast majority of the labour!
Thanks everyone!