Sorry I really didn't want to hijack this thread...
Tangle - I have experienced free universal healthcare in Quebec (Canada), which is my opinion, is comparable in quality to the private care I receive here in the UK, both generally and in terms of women's reproductive health which I find particularly poor on the NHS. NB: every province in Canada runs their own healthcare system and while always free and universal, I cannot state from experience that every province operates the same.
For example, women are offered smears every single year from the age of 18 or whenever they become sexually active, whichever comes first. Here in the UK you are only allowed every three years from the age of 25. The NHS may come up with all sorts of arguments as to why further screens are not necessary, but Canadian doctors seem to disagree.
When it comes to childbirth, you have access to an obstetrician for all your care - not just a midwife. And you will will get continuity of care throughout, not see a different midwife each and every time. (I often hear arguments that midwife led care results in better outcomes for mothers and babies, but the mortality rate for mothers and babies is lower in Canada than the UK - this includes perinatal, stillbirths and neonatal rates).
Until I moved to the UK, I never heard of husbands being given the boot out of the post natal wards after visiting hours. When my friends and family have given birth, they almost always had a private room.
BecauseImWorthIt In addition to the reasons stated above, I find the NHS inadequate in their level of care / knowledge for a number of reasons including:
- My midwife (as lovely as she is - I do actually quite like her) is not able to answer very basic questions such as "is it ok for me to have the flu jab if I'm pregnant?". She had to phone a friend for the answer - and she is the unit's team lead!
- Many women I know here in the UK have had similar experiences with their midwifes (one was told to "google it") and have subsequently hired independent midwifes.
- On several occasions I have seen an NHS GP regarding different issues, and when the problem persisted, I went to see a private GP instead for a second opinion. Usually the NHS GP had overlooked something. In one case, she completely missed the fact that my eardrum was perforated and required surgery.
- It can take weeks or even months to get appointments for care needed, whereas privately (or in Canada) the wait is usually shorter or non-existent.
- I cannot get an appointment to see my NHS GP very easily, so more often than not, I go to the private GP at work instead. I'm lucky to have this option!
- I also don't like the fact that I cannot choose my GP on the NHS, or choose one in a location that is most convenient for me (e.g. close to work which is more or less my home). In Canada you can have any doctor you like.
So overall I am not terribly impressed by the NHS. Yes, it's better than having no access to healthcare at all, and in spite of the fact I'm getting sweet F all out of the tax dollars I put into it, I still support its existence.
But it doesn't meet my expectations most of the time so I end up paying twice for my healthcare.
The only thing I think the NHS does better than Canada in my opinion is free birth control and condoms (you pay a prescription rate in Canada for the former) and that community midwifes will do home visits.
Hope that clarifies where I am coming from!