Canigress, funny enough, a link posted not too long ago (a pdf epidural leaflet) stated in flat out contradiction to what your NICE 'facts' say, that there is no adverse effect on babies' breathing associated with epidurals.
It is also grossly misleading to suggest that an epidural goes hand in hand with a catheter. It is not necessarily so at all.
IV access is required for many women who do not have an epidural, and frankly IV access is not a big deal. A canula goes into your hand or arm and remains in situ until after the baby is born. You may get a bit of bruising. What's the big deal?
Again, a very rare thing that can go wrong is cited (but thank you for stating that is very rare) as if it should somehow factor into a woman's decision to have an epidural. If the very rare things that can go wrong were to be a factor in how we live our daily lives, we would all spend our days hiding out under the dining room table in fear of being shat on by birds, hit by busses, run over by cyclists. You are far more likely to drown in your bathtub than to fall victim to any of the alleged risks of epidurals.
A few more points from your posts, Canugress:
Pushing can always be controlled. It takes vigilance and a good deal of work from the nurse, doctor or midwife directing the patient, but in every single delivery of mine, including the one with the epidural, I pushed when I was told to and the final push to deliver the baby's head was always done in a very controlled manner. For the delivery with the epidural, my doctor gave me feedback constantly as DD1 made her way into the world and I was able to follow instructions wrt strength of effort. I had a small episiotomy each time except for the last delivery, done to prevent larger, less predictable, and harder to repair tears (episiotomies are not the horror they are cracked up to be either). Very few perineums survive delivery intact, epidural or no epidural.
'Women used to ask to go home at transition - nowadays they ask for epidurals.... it doesn't mean that they really want them, rather it means that they can't cope with this stage for much longer. It is a sign, that she is really getting on with her labour and is almost there.'
GASP. After all that has been said here, that statement is incredibly arrogant. It does so mean that they really want an epidural. They have been told they can have one, and they want one. Give them the bloody epidural and don't patronise them. They are only seeing it from their own pov when they ask for an epidural. It sincerely does not matter to them what their pain is a sign of. Epidurals were designed so that they would not have to feel that pain that makes them ask for help, by people who do not think pain is a necessary part of childbirth. (i.e. people who are humane)
What you personally have seen and heard of do not constitute actual quantified risks. If you as a medical professional are going to talk about results of epidurals you need to give figures here. As has been said before, no it isn't funny if you're the unlucky one out of 100,000, 10,000, or 1,000 who has the bad experience, but the fact remains that when you're deciding as a patient what to do, it's your judgement that counts. FWIW, I had meningitis as a child and had a spinal and survived the headache afterwards. It's bad but it's not as bad as labour on pitocin, not by a long shot.
Primafacie, thank you for your great post. Yes, the risks of epidurals have been massively overrepresented and I believe shockingly misunderstood by many who posted them.