Help end medical misogyny. Sign our petition.

Help end medical misogyny.
Sign our petition.

Sign the petition

Please or to access all these features

Cancer

Find advice & support if you or someone you know has been diagnosed with cancer

Should governments investigate possible links between Covid vaccines and rising cancer rates?

87 replies

Adrianne1988 · 26/03/2026 06:50

Germany is holding a parliamentary inquiry into its COVID response — including how the mRNA vaccines were approved and rolled out. And during that inquiry, a former Chief Toxicologist for Pfizer Europe, Dr. Helmut Sterz, was called to testify.

Under questioning, he said that several key safety studies were not carried out before approval, including long-term carcinogenicity testing. He told the committee that the approval process was accelerated so quickly that important toxicity studies were sacrificed in order to save time.

He also stated that the substance used during the clinical trials was not identical to the one later mass-produced for the population, saying the manufacturing process introduced contamination with bacterial DNA.

Those are serious claims. And they’re now being discussed inside a national parliament, not just on social media. The inquiry is also examining whether side effects and vaccine injuries were expected to be investigated after the vaccines had already been rolled out, rather than fully understood beforehand.

Whether people ultimately agree with his conclusions or not, the fact remains, there has been a noticeable uptick in the rates of many types of cancer since 2021 and therefore should not our governments and health authorities be tasked with investigating a possible link, if nothing else to rule it out as coincidence?

Watch it and make up your own mind.

- YouTube

Enjoy the videos and music that you love, upload original content and share it all with friends, family and the world on YouTube.

https://youtu.be/xBw4NgG0KMs

OP posts:
scalt · 27/03/2026 09:31

@Newbutoldfather i can understand (kind of) the need to have locked down - earlier and shorter would have been better, in hindsight.

But where Boris and his merry men did shoot themselves in both feet were they so many of the rungs they did were so obviously underhand, to name but a few:
Partygate.
Frightening the pants off the public.
Pointlessly changing roolz.
U-turn after screeching u-turn. Masks worse than useless; next moment, compulsory. Schools safe, closed next day.
PPE scandal.

The list goes on and on. Why does the government deserve our trust?

Wrexhamgirl · 27/03/2026 09:41

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

noblegiraffe · 27/03/2026 09:57

I don't want to be a conspiracy theorist but did anyone else see the long post that was just on this thread responding to @Newbutoldfather about covid response that has just literally vanished from MN? Not 'deleted for breaking talk guidelines', just gone?

I have a copy of it so I know I'm not making it up.

RafaistheKingofClay · 27/03/2026 11:05

I can see one by @scalt immediately above yours. Is that the one?

noblegiraffe · 27/03/2026 11:17

RafaistheKingofClay · 27/03/2026 11:05

I can see one by @scalt immediately above yours. Is that the one?

No, this was much longer, posted by someone with a name like Wrexhamgirl. Definitely on this thread because it referenced Newbutoldfather's point about Sweden's population density. Said it was irrelevant as their population was mostly concentrated in towns and cities.

RafaistheKingofClay · 27/03/2026 11:31

Weird. Wonder if HQ tried to delete it normally and it disappeared into a hole in the site.

Newbutoldfather · 27/03/2026 12:43

@noblegiraffe ,

‘No, this was much longer, posted by someone with a name like Wrexhamgirl. Definitely on this thread because it referenced Newbutoldfather's point about Sweden's population density. Said it was irrelevant as their population was mostly concentrated in towns and cities.’

Wish I had seen it and then we could have talked about the relative sizes and population densities of the cities too.

And the fact that Sweden did move all 6th forms and unis to distance learning too (although not schools).

RafaistheKingofClay · 27/03/2026 12:59

And the restriction of movement from area to area. The move to WFH, not using public transport unless necessary, no mass gatherings, maximum capacities in buildings, not being allowed into school if you had any symptom of illness even hayfever until you had had a negative PCR test.

People always seem to act like Sweden was a complete free for all. It wasn’t it’s just the onus was on people to be socially responsible and avoid contact by choice.

sleepwouldbenice · 30/03/2026 00:24

Newbutoldfather · 27/03/2026 08:26

I do just find it incredible how vulnerable people are to conspiracy theories.

What leader of a democracy would choose to lock its populace down and sacrifice vast amounts of wealth for no reason?

All they are doing is shooting themselves in the foot for the next election.

You could argue (correctly) that the fatality and hospitalisation rate was overestimated at first (1.5% mortality was the early estimate, later revised down to 0.4% about). But 1.5% was the best guess at the time, based on the Italian outbreak.

And, of course, the lower rate is based on hospitals being open and ICU treatment being available (hence the need for lockdown).

All this stuff has been mathematically proven. People like to say ‘but Sweden’. However, viruses spread by contact and Sweden’s population density is 1/16th of England’s, so we would need to decrease contact by a factor of 16 to get to Sweden’s unlocked down contact level.

The SIRS and similar mathematical models show how diseases spread and how much you need to reduce contact to prevent spread. The only other solution is vaccination.

This is all just basic mathematics and science. It is such a shame that people don’t believe in experts (and epidemiologists and virologists are genuine experts, unlike politicians and economists say).

Stop talking sense and facts, you know they can’t take it!

sleepwouldbenice · 30/03/2026 00:30

Itsabingthin · 26/03/2026 15:27

Are you serious? The way I felt almost forced into getting the vaccine. Being told that it’s safe. I’m so glad I didn’t push my teens into getting it and I regret getting it myself.

I feel the opposite

so oddly it’s not about opinions or individual experiences
it’s about major studies, peer review, evidence, statistics and actual facts

the classic example is prattling on about Sweden and ignoring the many times pointed out differences between countries. And ignoring Italy, Spain ,New York, India…..

sleepwouldbenice · 30/03/2026 00:36

scalt · 27/03/2026 09:31

@Newbutoldfather i can understand (kind of) the need to have locked down - earlier and shorter would have been better, in hindsight.

But where Boris and his merry men did shoot themselves in both feet were they so many of the rungs they did were so obviously underhand, to name but a few:
Partygate.
Frightening the pants off the public.
Pointlessly changing roolz.
U-turn after screeching u-turn. Masks worse than useless; next moment, compulsory. Schools safe, closed next day.
PPE scandal.

The list goes on and on. Why does the government deserve our trust?

I don’t disagree with some of this. Boris and Co are broadly idiots and have my contempt for many many things

but on the other hand the balance between health and economy was a brutal one. The effects of both are still felt today. It was a pandemic after all

And of course being with loved ones if the fell ill or dealing with isolation, etc was also brutalbut I also knew families where people were attending funerals of loved ones who dies with covid, then people caught it from the funeral and came close to death themselves. What terrible choices…

scalt · 30/03/2026 07:09

And here is the thing that worries me now. Let us suppose that things in Iran were worse than they are now, our oil supply threatened, and once again, our government was asking us to modify our behaviour: use cars less, for example, or petrol rationing, with “key workers” (a phrase which instantly brings back memories) being allowed to use more. People even now might still be angry about Partygate, or vaccine damage, their children suffering from lost education, or being denied a parent’s funeral, and be thinking “no government is going to boss me around ever again”. So the government might then resort to the now tried and tested plan B: use the press to frighten the pants off the public, and put infantilising slogans everywhere. “Think before you fill!” (your car, that is)

Relying so heavily on fear porn in 2020 was “cry wolf” syndrome for many people.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page