Was at the Museum of Docklands with DH, DS1 and DS2 on the weekend. They have a great section for the kiddies called Mudlarks that has a soft play area. Also a seating section in the corner. Three-month-old DS2 is bottle-fed from week 1. I had a lot of issues trying to BF DS1 (including medical issues) and was in pieces about it for weeks before reluctantly giving up at six weeks with DS1. Doesn't sound like a long time but I went through hell and back that time and even the BF counsellor told me to give DS1 formula and even got the health visitor to come and see me as she was so concerned about my mental state. With DS2, I recognised a lot of the same issues and gave up BF-ing very quickly as I had DS1 to look after as well. I still have a complex about not being able to BF and conscious about feeding DS2 in public (but I promise you I am not the mad woman in Bluewater from the other thread! !).
So we got to the museum and DS1 headed straight to the Mudlarks area. I went to go in and the 'helper' was being a bit pedantic about stuff ('No water, no food' and checking the heights of the children before allowing them into soft play and actually refusing entry to a couple of siblings just over height restrictions! ) so I casually asked if I could feed DS2 in there. And he said BF-ing is allowed but not bottle-feeding...
Pardon me? I couldn't quite believe it and checked with him again and he said no to bottle feeding. So I had to sit outside, in a badly lit sitting area to feed DS2 instead of being able to watch DS1 playing with DH. I did feel very much the outcast. I have to say I didn't ask the reason why though...
Are they justified in doing this? Is there a good reason to allow BF-ing and not bottle feeding? I want to make a complaint cos to be honest, it's a contentious enough issue without family-friendly places like that making more divisions... Thanks.