Not falling out, lilymolly
If you think my points about breastfeeding and poverty were 'good', and yet you don't see they have anything to do with Oxfam and the campaign against poverty, then here's another try:
Some areas of the world are disproportionately affected by poverty and debt. In these areas, babies are especially vulnerable - and their risk of illness and dying is increased if their mothers do not breastfeed, and indeed, if they use bottles.
One way Oxfam works against world poverty is to enable mothers in these areas to breastfeed, and to avoid the use of bottles (they are one of the leading NGOs in nutrition and education, and work at a strategic and individual level to protect breastfeeding in areas where bottle feeding is especially dangerous).
To use a bottle as an icon - and this is certainly how it is used in this clip, representing 'babies' and 'mothers' as it does all over the world - undermines this work in principle.
You may not think 'principles' are important, and it would be hard to argue that the effect of one 2 second clip on a video was very great in practice...but lots of people do think working with principles is important, and that how we say what we say may be as important as the actual words.
I don't think that arguing for principles and care about the way messages are made is mad, or ridiculous, or militant.