Of course factual information about infant feeding should be published. It may be appropriate in the Ecologist to use dramatic terminology. The article is well-researched and full of evidence about marketing tactics and other aspects of the whole issue, and is worth reading by anyone with an interest in the topic.
But on a parenting website, on a board which purports to offer support, in a place where we hear every day - literally - about women's deep sadness at not breastfeeding, about their pain when they cannot get help, and about how sensitive they are to the whole thing.....no, you don't use terms like 'junk', because it hurts people's feelings and makes them feel defensive and criticised.
People feeling sensitive and sad can choose whether or not to go to the link to the Ecologist, and avoid it if they know it will upset them.
But they can't avoid reading the word 'junk' in the thread header.
And moondog - you know how distressed people can be. How can you bear to make them more distressed? And how on earth do you think this progresses the debate when you have tearful people on one side of it?
You should be ashamed of yourself.