niminy, you say 'we need to differentiate between women who did not bf and never wanted to, and those who wanted to, tried and failed.'
I agree - but I'd go further. The whole thing is far too complex to divide women into 2 distinct groups ie i) women who don't bf at all because they did not want to and ii) women who don't bf for as long as they want to.
There is overlap and nuances and obfuscation and denial and mixtures of feelings and motivations. I mean, what about the women who do not want to bf at all, and yet do so for a short time, or the women who really do want to bf but don't start to do it for their own reasons? And there are many more 'categories' and types!
It's for this reason that I disagree with you when you say, ' Anwyay, the experiences of these two groups will be sharply different.'
Of course the 'embodied grief' idea is speculative. But you go on to describe something that is indeed primal in your word - an experience of self-judgement and disappointment compounded with real or imagined judgements from other women but which also affects the body and its functioning. Why is it difficult to believe that the bodily experience (of not breastfeeding) would not add fuel to that emotional and psychological fire? I assume you don't reject the whole idea of body/mind/unconscious influencing each other in many ways?
You say, "As to what bf organisations can do. I think principally, they can take it on the chin, that the way bf is promoted by them is a causal factor in such feelings." I do recognise that breastfeeding promotion can make bad feelings worse - and the bf organisations I know are sensitive (massively sensitive) to this.
I don't know of any organsation that says 'every woman can (and should) bf', though I am sure there are individuals anywhere and everywhere that might say that,
Your next point is interesting: "Secondly, if they are serious about helping women who failed to bf, they need to set up a dedicated service (much as maternity units have dedicated midwife counsellors). The job should not be left to bf counsellors who see their role as helping women to bf. " I understand your thinking, but just as midwife counsellors (assuming you mean the postbirth ones? Whose work has evaluated poorly, by the way.....) are also midwives who do 'normal' midwifery work as well, breastfeeding counsellors can (and do) talk to women who feel bad they stopped breastfeeding.
You say "In my case, my baby screamed and squirmed away from the breast. The LLL counsellor simply walked away and went to talk to people who just needed a little help adjusting a latch." If you are talking about an LLL peer counsellor, she would not be qualified to work with you, experiencing that issue. She should have explained that, of course - walking away in silence is not good! She should have reported your difficulty.
Avenged - I am really sorry you felt so let down by eight NCT breastfeeding counsellors. I am amazed you live somewhere you can actually be seen by 8 of us - I don't know where in the UK that would be! We are not that numerous! Perhaps you have mistaken who they were. I don't recognise the idea that they looked down their noses at you, but as we are not qualified to give medical advice it may have been they felt your concerns were outside their remit.
Any remark passed to you about not giving the best you can should be reported - it's not acceptable at all, and I can understand your anger. I have never come across any NCT colleagues who would think that or say that.
Perhaps you are mistaken about what NCT and LLL do? They are not part of the govt - NCT and LLL are charities.