Hi again,
I've read through all your messages and I really appreciate your feedback. It seems that despite the differing opinions, there is an overwhelming cry for a change in the way midwives are trained, rather than a change to the 'breast is best' slogan. I take that on board.
Following my son's birth, the midwives were nowhere to be seen, but the community midwives that visited me at home were supposedly trained to teach women to breastfeed, (however, when one suggested I drink nesquick to boost my milk supply, I should have been suspicious!) What they lacked, was an ability to spot when my baby was not thriving.
I also think that the fact I saw a different midwife virtually every day, may have added to the problem, as perhaps each one thought I was having an off day!
Maybe I'm wrong, but I really believe that my body just wasn't up to the job. The trouble is, there is this belief that all women can breastfeed, if they have the right support. But what if this is just not the case?
I'm shocked to hear that midwifery training doesn't include breastfeeding support as standard. That explains a lot!
When I challenge the 'breast is best' slogan, I still believe that breast milk is the healthiest option. I just think that there should be an asterisk with 'for women who produce enough milk/for babies who are thriving etc!' Women who want to breastfeed, who fail at it, are led to believe that not only is breast best, but that there is no other safe and healthy option. This encourages women to continue trying to feed, to the detriment of their health and that of their babies.
BTW I don't believe that the male midwife was a 'twunt'! Midwives are told to hospitalise babies when they lose 10% of their body weight and my son had lost more than that. I was in a really awful emotional state and I think he could tell that hospitalising my baby would have ended up with me being hospitalised too! In my eyes, he was right to feed my son a bottle. The damage had already been done.