RelaxedAndCalm - sorry but I don't see ANYTHING in this thread which is remotely along the lines of 'all formula companies kill children' line....
I am sorry but the World Health Organisation spent a lot of time doing experiments, meeting commissioning reports and issued the guidance on how to make formula safely.
Fair enough if the formula companies DISAGREE with this information - but why don't they issue statements saying - Ah Yes we see what the WHO say but for XYZ reason we don't agree.
I don't think the formula companies have an interest in putting babies at risk but they are obviously money and profit driven.
This is the same as the pharma industry but I find the controls over the formula company to be lacking.
Yes people working there will be parents like you and me but ultimately the boards of the company make the decision - and their decision is to say they won't adopt the WHO guidelines (unless pressured to by individual companies) and they won't explain why they won't.
They could also give much more comprehensive info on how to make formula, different methods and levels of risk etc - but they don't.
Have you ever seen this which shows what they put on the side of the formula packs in other countries?
How would you go about reducing the number of hospital admissions due to D&V in FF babies. Possibly a lot of these are caused by infections introduced within the home and I think that lots of parents are very very casual about how they make formula.
I'm not talking now about the 70 degree thing but about lack of attention to hygiene, bottles hanging around all day.
I do not think there would be many on MN who do this sort of thing but amongst areas with poor education and social deprivation I think formula is held up as a magic potion - there is no awareness of the risks.
I think that formula companies should make DAMN sure that people know how to make the product up safely - but they don't - why - it would cost money and draw attention to the cons of formula.