I think you might be confused OP between different schools called St Bede’s/Bede’s and football programmes in the UK?
St Bede’s College in Manchester is the long-established education partner used for Manchester City academy players. However it’s a day school, not a boarding school. The players are recruited into the Man City academy first through the club system, then sit entry exams to attend St Bede’s alongside their training programme. All the actual football development — coaching, S&C, physio, nutrition, sports psychology etc — is done through Manchester City.
St Bede’s essentially works around the demands of elite academy football and is located very close to the Etihad/CFA, which makes practical sense for daily training.
From what I can see, Rossall is a boarding school, but just has a commercial partnership using the Man City brand, rather than being “the” Manchester City academy school in the way St Bede’s is. The students there will be on a completely different trajectory and do football for enjoyment outside of normal schooling commitments, rather than being developed due to professional potential.
Rossall looks completely different geographically and structurally too. It’s near Blackpool/Fleetwood, so roughly 90 minutes from Manchester, which means it couldn’t realistically function as the daily education base for Manchester City academy scholars. It also says Rossall have appointed a new Headteacher this year, who does appear to have a football background, but very else. If a school (particularly a boarding school) is using football branding to market and being led by a football coach, I would be asking serious questions about the academic and pastoral side and what its going to do for my childs future.
Successful boarding schools are known for their strong academic outcomes and they typically demand a higher price tag for producing outstanding exam results that support entry into top universities, not for producing footballers. Personally, I would see sports leadership in a boarding school as a red flag. Any school appointing new head with a predominantly PE/sport background can not simultaneously be offering serious academics and a strong boarding environment, but equally they are not a unique sports school either. If my child was moving to the other side of the world to be educated I would expect intellectual leadership at the very least and for them to have a separate head of sports to specialise in that.
Choosing a school is a very personal decision but which ever school you choose, understand that a Year 10 moving into a boarding school, is not going to enter the environment genuine elite academy players are developed in. Boarding schools revolve around academic timetables, routines, house systems and supervised structure. Elite academy football revolves around the club. Everything else fits around that.
You would never realistically place a serious Category One academy player in a boarding school environment far away from daily family support and direct club infrastructure. It would massively limit access to training, recovery, individual coaching and the emotional support system needed to survive that level of pressure. Professional football is brutal! Children are assessed constantly, released constantly and psychologically stretched from very young ages. No child gets through that system alone. The successful ones will always have an enormous amount of family support, stability and sacrifice behind them long before age 15, so might be a good idea to reduce expectations for what your son will achieve in the UK.