I would second almost all of this and could practically have written the same account.
We have seen our son thrive in his first year at WinColl. He has kept up various interests we feared he would drop as a teen (eg singing) and has tried many new sports and societies etc and stuck at a few (more than enough). Interestingly, he has also developed a habit of taking himself for runs, something that never ever happened before. He’s starting to remember he’s actually rather athletic having absolutely not been given this feeling during the latter years at his prep.
His social skills have come on in leaps and bounds these past few months and when we look at his cohort we are not seeing the stereotype of a quirky boy at all. Yes, there are some clearly clever pupils but they are down to earth, polite and respectful. The schools seems to be rallying around furthering its focus on developing critical thinking. Some strong views are forming and the Head needs to articulate and discuss these when being bombarded with questions around AI and the post inflation and VAT driven inflation in fees. I’ve never felt this was anything more than confident resilience. Narcissism isn’t how we interpret her in any way, but each to their own.
The pupils are also doing well on the sports field for a school that’s apparently not sporty. We also learnt they were runners up in what is, according to the organisers, the most prestigious royal marine endurance event for cadets. Again at odds with many mumsnet comments about the “type of boy”.
One of the most pleasing things we have seen play out is that our son has pivoted from the subjects his prep told him he was good at ie maths and sciences (possibly for 11+ results reasons?) and is now also immersing himself in new languages, history and English (not taught but coming via Div). We did not expect this pivot but from what we can work out this has happened because he has had the time Boarding provides and been engaged/inspired by teachers in subjects he almost dreaded as recently as 6 months ago. He himself mostly cites the teachers for this, but it may be when home he now reads a bit more to learn versus relax. He is even more curious since he started. Wonderful.
Why making a first post? I’ve finally spoken up because of the volume of comments about the school we simply don’t recognise as parents. Some comments even make me uncomfortable eg in other threads the casual comments around “boys being on the spectrum”.
Some negatives. The school is much better than it markets itself. On the one hand this is better than lots of bluster and no substance, but it may mean they are missing out around the margins getting some great pupils so they ought to address this to maintain a diverse cohort. To understand what I mean; have a try at finding the Royal Marines result, how good the school is at cricket or how many players are fielded through the levels for football etc from the schools own sources. It’s tough to find so can lead to assumptions about the pupils sporting abilities. Other schools do a great job of this.
With regards to boys v co-ed, it’s not something our son has ever raised with us and although we clearly opted for a predominantly boys school we welcome a co-Ed sixth form. Possibly the bigger topic being grappled with by the school and parents is how they are dealing with full boarding versus other schools relaxing this. They remain as strict as they say they are. Comparing notes with friends, Radley is probably the “most” full-boarding of Radley, Harrow, Eton and Winchester. Winchester and Harrow seem to tie for second. But this is anecdotal.
It’s a great school with smart, polite and well rounded pupils from what we can see. It stands for critical thinking and educating versus teaching for exams, but seems to have struggled before the new head joined to confidently articulate this.