Hallo ladies - have texted spangle so will advise if she gets in touch with me before she can get on here, exciting huh??!
OK i have some queries for Belgian sorry to offload on you but would appreciate your thoughts and advice. I had a growth scan today and all is fine - I'm 34+4 and Pip is on about 60th centile and weighs about 5lb9oz apparently. He has always been and remains very wriggly. Brief over - saw a new registrar, who went into mild hysteria over my age (41) and said I will need to be induced at term??? Also if i go into natural labour on or before term then I will need constant monitoring (the belt type, can't remember the name, CTG/ECG??) I was shocked at these comments and said I didn't want to be induced and wanted a natural, unmonitored water birth - which he said was likley to be impossible.....
He clarified all this by syaing that the incidence of still births in the over 40's is significant and they want to have the baby out whilst still kicking However, when i asked him for the stats on this he couldn't provide them!!!!
I was quite assertive with him and said I'd review once i get to term and make a decision then. He's booked me in for a sweep on 5th May anyway.
So sorry for the long post but just wanted your prof opinion. Lotti was induced at 13 days over as my waters had broken so they did it a day early and she was born with an apgar of 10!
Bloody good job I'm not a panic merchant as I'd be booking in to be induced now, grrr....