Help end medical misogyny. Sign our petition.

Help end medical misogyny.
Sign our petition.

Sign the petition

Please or to access all these features

Baby names

Find baby name inspiration and advice on the Mumsnet Baby Names forum.

Anyone else dislike traditionally boys' names being used for girls?

157 replies

Innitoutit · 22/05/2026 13:58

Does anyone else hate the trend of giving girls traditionally boy names (Elliott, Ezra, James, Scottie, Tommy, etc.)? Currently pregnant and had a family member suggest one of these types of names for our daughter and almost rolled my eyes when she said it. I don't understand why it's so popular at the moment and why so many parents seemingly want their daughters to be seen as masculine. Maybe it bothers me because you never see it go the other way round. You never see feminine names become unisex. It does seem to be more popular in America (thankfully), but I can see it increasing in popularity here.

OP posts:
Are your children’s vaccines up to date?
mathanxiety · 22/05/2026 23:39

FruAashild · 22/05/2026 20:33

You do know Stacey is actually one of the names that has this feminisation happen to it?

Edited

Stacey is an abbreviation of Anastasia.

MrsLFii · 22/05/2026 23:41

Tigerbalmshark · 22/05/2026 21:51

I had to google quite extensively to find this, but apparently it’s a female version of Donald. How you get Dolina from Donald I really cannot say.

I have seen other Victorian horrors - Albertina, Voltairine, Johnina, Peterina, Robertina. Particularly awful names as there is often a decent female version in existence as well (Peterina is awful compared to Petra for example, Robertina could just have been called Roberta. Georgina/Georgette are much uglier than Georgia).

I saw a comment on Facebook earlier from a Joshualynn. Come off it 😭

im with you op, and all the others who’ve said it implies girls names, and by implication girls, are weak.

NamingNoNames · 22/05/2026 23:41

It's a surname.

raisinglittlepeople12 · 22/05/2026 23:46

Yes, but mainly because there are sooo many gorgeous girl names that it feels like a wasted opportunity

Spaghettioverload · 22/05/2026 23:49

I wasn’t aware of this trend but it does sound very silly.

mathanxiety · 22/05/2026 23:53

LettuceAndCarrots · 22/05/2026 22:57

Sometimes they make the switch from boy to girl in America but not in the UK (at least not yet).

I would guess that includes Elliott, Ashley and Sydney which to me are still very much boy names. As is Rowan although I feel that one is a strong contender for being lost to boys in the future unfortunately.

All the Ashleys and Sydneys I know are girls. I know two small girls named Elliott. They are called Ellie in daily life. The male Elliotts I know (and all related spellings) are all in their mid 30s and up.

I know equal numbers of male and female Logans, Dylans, Rileys, Cassidys, Caseys, Ryans, Ezras, Micahs, Glenns, and Jordans.

There are some surnamey names that are exclusively used for girls, as far as I can see - Harper, Kelly, Carrington, and a few others.

Some of these names are used because they shorten to recognizable girl names (Carrie from Carrington, for example).

For the most part, people using surname names for girls are following old Southern and WASP tradition though.

I'm in the US. People here tend to be polite about others' choices, but you can tell that some families prefer traditional names.

Teresa7 · 22/05/2026 23:59

I do agree with you for the names you’ve used as examples. However, my absolute favourite type of names are proper girls names (the more “frilly” the better) that have traditionally masculine nicknames.

EG a Lavinia who goes by Vinnie. A Leonora who goes by Leo. A Josephine who goes by Joey. I don’t know why, I just think it’s very chic!

NamingNoNames · 23/05/2026 00:05

Chic?Hmm

OtterandaRock · 23/05/2026 00:10

Imagine a story about red-haired sisters, Burleigh and Raleigh, who timeslip to the Tudor age. Their foe is a boy named Marion. I would read it.

Teresa7 · 23/05/2026 00:14

@NamingNoNames that’s my opinion!

Strangerthanfictions · 23/05/2026 00:15

buymeaboaanddrivemetoreno · 22/05/2026 21:14

What about the ‘trend’ of naming daughters after fathers - Dolina, Georgina, Alberta etc. This isn’t exactly new!

Nigella!! We have a lot of this going on in our family as there were 7 sisters and only 2 brothers and a lot of guys who needed naming after apparently

Crispynoodle · 23/05/2026 00:20

Robyn not a fan

buymeaboaanddrivemetoreno · 23/05/2026 00:34

NamingNoNames · 22/05/2026 21:22

That's not the same as giving a girl a boy's name.

It’s almost exactly the same

buymeaboaanddrivemetoreno · 23/05/2026 00:37

Zov · 22/05/2026 21:36

Exactly this.

Also, I have never heard of the name Dolina. And I don't know what the 'male' version is.

Meant to type Colina but Dolina is an anglised, feminised Domhnull (Donald in gaelic)..

user1492757084 · 23/05/2026 00:42

It's terrible. It is as if girls need to over power a boy name to be strong. Like being feminine is not enough.
Imagine if boys needed to be named Pamela or Elizabeth to exert their caring natures.

A Boy Named Sue is a song where a boy is ridiculed for his name.

Tigerbalmshark · 23/05/2026 00:46

MrsLFii · 22/05/2026 23:41

I saw a comment on Facebook earlier from a Joshualynn. Come off it 😭

im with you op, and all the others who’ve said it implies girls names, and by implication girls, are weak.

Yet more googling, and I have discovered “Davina” is…. a female version of Dave! Dave-ina.

Who knew? 🤣

k1233 · 23/05/2026 01:08

NamingNoNames · 22/05/2026 17:53

Well Gavin is unisex isn't it. I hope Stacey is pleased with his little sister. Smile

I went to school with a male Stacey...

Needspaceforlego · 23/05/2026 01:17

NamingNoNames · 22/05/2026 17:53

Well Gavin is unisex isn't it. I hope Stacey is pleased with his little sister. Smile

No Gavin is a boys name. Its no more unisex than something like Allan or Graham

SquirrelGG · 23/05/2026 01:46

Doesn't bother me at all - and I say that as someone with a name which is normally used for boys these days but was a common girls name many hundreds of years ago. I love my name, and my mum most definitely wanted a girl.

selffellatingouroborosofhate · 23/05/2026 03:14

Tryagain26 · 22/05/2026 20:32

I don't like it either. And you never get traditional girls names used for boys. Why is it?

Yes you do. Look up John Wayne's real name...

selffellatingouroborosofhate · 23/05/2026 03:19

mathanxiety · 22/05/2026 23:53

All the Ashleys and Sydneys I know are girls. I know two small girls named Elliott. They are called Ellie in daily life. The male Elliotts I know (and all related spellings) are all in their mid 30s and up.

I know equal numbers of male and female Logans, Dylans, Rileys, Cassidys, Caseys, Ryans, Ezras, Micahs, Glenns, and Jordans.

There are some surnamey names that are exclusively used for girls, as far as I can see - Harper, Kelly, Carrington, and a few others.

Some of these names are used because they shorten to recognizable girl names (Carrie from Carrington, for example).

For the most part, people using surname names for girls are following old Southern and WASP tradition though.

I'm in the US. People here tend to be polite about others' choices, but you can tell that some families prefer traditional names.

A lot of surnames are derived from first names, such as Johnson (John's son) and Price (ap Rhys), so why not the other way around?

CurlewKate · 23/05/2026 06:57

selffellatingouroborosofhate · 23/05/2026 03:14

Yes you do. Look up John Wayne's real name...

John Wayne was not called a girl’s name. He was called a traditional male name that became exclusively female. This is a regular pattern- once a male name starts to be used for girls it suddenly stops being used for boys. Because it is seen to be weakened and demeaned by association with girls. That is why girl’s names are NEVER used for boys.

LettuceAndCarrots · 23/05/2026 07:45

mathanxiety · 22/05/2026 23:53

All the Ashleys and Sydneys I know are girls. I know two small girls named Elliott. They are called Ellie in daily life. The male Elliotts I know (and all related spellings) are all in their mid 30s and up.

I know equal numbers of male and female Logans, Dylans, Rileys, Cassidys, Caseys, Ryans, Ezras, Micahs, Glenns, and Jordans.

There are some surnamey names that are exclusively used for girls, as far as I can see - Harper, Kelly, Carrington, and a few others.

Some of these names are used because they shorten to recognizable girl names (Carrie from Carrington, for example).

For the most part, people using surname names for girls are following old Southern and WASP tradition though.

I'm in the US. People here tend to be polite about others' choices, but you can tell that some families prefer traditional names.

Yes it's really different here in the UK. I know one Cassidy, who is a woman (it is so similar to Cassie it doesn't sound masculine to me), and one female child Ezra (which raised eyebrows). I'm aware of Glenn Close. I don't know any girls called any of your other examples. Sydney and Ryan are hideous for a girl to me.

FruAashild · 23/05/2026 09:55

mathanxiety · 22/05/2026 23:39

Stacey is an abbreviation of Anastasia.

Not in the UK, it's an English surname that then became a boy's name.

NamingNoNames · 23/05/2026 11:19

@Needspaceforlego , No Gavin is a boys name. Its no more unisex than something like Allan or Graham They're unisex too. Smile

@buymeaboaanddrivemetoreno It’s almost exactly the same
There's a difference in that something like Philippa doesn't make you think that it's a boy/man in the way that Philip does.

@Tigerbalmshark , did you really not know?

@selffellatingouroborosofhate , because a lot of surnames 'son of [name]' or are an occupation. Something like Madison is like calling a girl 'Matthew's son'

Swipe left for the next trending thread