Are your children’s vaccines up to date?

Set a reminder

Please or to access all these features

Baby names

Find baby name inspiration and advice on the Mumsnet Baby Names forum.

Is it cruel to give your son a “unisex name” nowadays

78 replies

Elizabethdelver11 · 21/05/2022 13:21

This is random but i was just looking through the new US Name list and names that were once male names are predominantly girls names and have been for the past 20 years. It just got me thinking about how it would be cruel to give your little boy a name like Ashley, Taylor, Addison, Avery nowadays. (I Always thought Ashley sounded like a girls name anyway)They don’t even make the top 200 now for boys. I would imagine boys today would be heavily bullied to have such “feminine” style names. They are unisex but I think many people now associate them with girls! I know I do. What’s everyone’s opinion on this? Is it just me

OP posts:
Are your children’s vaccines up to date?
ChiefWiggumsBoy · 21/05/2022 21:52

Thinking about it, I actually only know male Ashley's and Riley's. Don't know anyone with the other names, they sound like surnames used as first names to me (aside from Aubrey). Oh I lie, I have worked with a Tayla.

mathanxiety · 21/05/2022 21:53

@Elizabethdelver11, I see you live in the South. I'm a good deal further north. I would not expect to see any teasing of a child on the basis of a name in any school I'm familiar with.

You surely are aware of the tradition of using surnames as first names in the South?

Does the name Harper Lee ring a bell? How about Flannery O'Connor? Shelby Foote? Jesse James?
Darby Camp?
Colbie Caillat?
Colby Minifie?

What in your opinion would be the sex of people bearing the name Dallas or Paris? Peyton? Remington?

Elizabethdelver11 · 21/05/2022 22:28

Paris and Payton sound like girls names to me. Dallas does sound like a boys name more and Remington doesn’t seem like it suits a boy or a girl it sounds like a dogs name imo.

OP posts:
mathanxiety · 22/05/2022 00:53

But ... Peyton Manning? Surely it doesn't get any more, well, manly?

And why does Dallas sound like a boy's name?

mathanxiety · 22/05/2022 00:57

How about Carrington?

1963andbewildered · 22/05/2022 01:02

Ashley is a boys name!

SlightlyGeordieJohn · 22/05/2022 01:03

mathanxiety · 22/05/2022 00:53

But ... Peyton Manning? Surely it doesn't get any more, well, manly?

And why does Dallas sound like a boy's name?

That film in which Debbie did him was hetero, wasn’t it?

As this thread goes on I’m getting more and more bemused at the names coming up. I don’t think I’ve ever met anyone in the U.K. with pretty much any of them.

wpse · 22/05/2022 01:21

Alex is my absolute favourite.

mathanxiety · 22/05/2022 01:36

That film in which Debbie did him was hetero, wasn’t it?

I keep on re-reading this sentence but I think I spent too much time out in the sun on Friday.

Can you please explain?

FrecklesMalone · 22/05/2022 01:55

We live in a big city. I hadn't hadn't heard of many of the names in my kid's classes. Those names would not raise am eyebrow. In fact both names were in the mix!

SlightlyGeordieJohn · 22/05/2022 09:27

mathanxiety · 22/05/2022 01:36

That film in which Debbie did him was hetero, wasn’t it?

I keep on re-reading this sentence but I think I spent too much time out in the sun on Friday.

Can you please explain?

Debbie Does Dallas. Is Dallas not a man in that film?

ChiefWiggumsBoy · 22/05/2022 14:33

No Dallas is a city. She shags her way round the city!

babyjellyfish · 23/05/2022 13:08

So... boy's names typically become thought of as girls' names once they start to be used by girls.

It's subtle and ingrained misogyny really. Giving a girl a boy's name gives her a certain cool factor, maybe even allows her a certain freedom to live her life without being stereotyped as a girl to the extent that she might be if she had a hyper feminine name.

Once the name starts to be commonly used by girls it becomes unisex, and just as quickly it becomes a girl's name. It's OK for a girl to be mistaken for a boy, but not for a boy to be mistaken for a girl.

It's why we think of names such as Evelyn, Hilary, Jocelyn, Meredith, Vivian and Lindsay as girls' names, even though they were all originally boys' names.

mathanxiety · 24/05/2022 04:12

Eloquently put, @babyjellyfish

DockOTheBay · 24/05/2022 04:19

I think Ashley is more of a female name in the US. In the UK I've never met a female Ashley but i know multiple men called Ashley, aged between 18 and 35 or so.
I've never met anyone with those other names and probably would consider them more American names. So maybe this is more of an issue over there? I wouldn't Ssume any of those were female names. They're pretty unisex.

DockOTheBay · 24/05/2022 04:24

There are some names which used to be mainly male names which are now mainly female ones, but they're much older - e.g. Tracey, Stacey, Lesley, Hilary, Lindsay. I would be surprised to meet a young male with these names, but I wouldn't consider it "cruel".

I suppose I would be surprised to met a young girl with one of those names too though since they're pretty dated.

onewednesdayindecember · 24/05/2022 04:28

I’ve always thought the American tendency for calling girls masculine/surname type names very different to the names given to girls in the uk. In my opinion those names are more masculine, but fine to call either a girl or a boy those names if that’s what the parent wants. I don’t think other children would care either way. I do think Addison is pretty awful for anyone though

ChnandlerBong · 24/05/2022 13:56

i know lots of female Ashleys (from the south of the UK) - surely it's properly unisex?

Also know girls called Taylor and Emerson both about 15 now...... think the American trend will catch on?

pinklavenders · 24/05/2022 14:07

Maybe all names should be unisex?

Why should a name identify a person's gender? This might remove a lot of discrimination.

BraveryBot9to5 · 24/05/2022 17:40

Those baby name wizards say anything ending with ley is for the girls, even finley! And as for Stanley, "cool for a girl but do not use it for a boy"

Ellmau · 25/05/2022 01:01

Ashley is a dated male name here, girl's name mainly in the US.
Taylor is unisex, I suppose, but very American.
Addison is awful, but I would assume male because of the son element.
Avery I quite like, and it feels a bit more male to me.

VivienneDelacroix · 25/05/2022 01:06

Of course it's not cruel. Two of my favourite are Rowan and Corin/ne. I really wish I had used Corin for my ds, but it's probably too late now at age 12 to change it!

KirstenBlest · 26/05/2022 18:17

I'd be wary of using one with a surname that can be or sounds like a girl's name.
Rowan Bell or Riley May sound like hyphenated names

CatsArePeople · 27/05/2022 16:20

I think the internalised misogyny comments come from the fact that it is often not considered cruel to give a girl a typically boys name, but is in reverse

Anybody calling girls Brian or Gary? Grin

soulinablackberrypie · 27/05/2022 22:19

I think Ashley is more of a female name in the US. In the UK I've never met a female Ashley but i know multiple men called Ashley, aged between 18 and 35 or so.

Same here, although I have known a very few girls with variant spellings like Ashlee or Ashleigh - which suggests UK parents still think it needs to be feminised in some way before it can be used for a girl.

Also all the Taylors (and Tylers too) I've known in the UK have been male. They were both quite popular boys' names when I worked in schools.

we think of names such as Evelyn, Hilary, Jocelyn, Meredith, Vivian and Lindsay as girls' names

To me, Vivian and Lindsay are the male spellings (though very unfashionable now) - most of the female ones I've known have been Vivien and Lindsey with the occasional Vivienne and Lynsey.