@vodkaicepops you're so right. It's a little amusing when someone complains that they've chosen a rare or 'unique' then discovered that many other children have it. They've obviously heard it mentioned a few times and liked it but the same has happened to so many other parents too. It isn't unique or rare, merely a lack of (self?) awareness. 
I think Peter and Elodie will be the next examples of the above. Maybe John as well. All lovely names but not particularly common for the last ten years.
What I like is the idea that in years to come people will look at their ancestors who had super cutesy, almost twee names but when they look at the birth certs they'll discover a trend. "Certificate/full name" + MN1 + MN2 + (often) double-barrelled surname! 
"This was your great great auntie Betsy or, according to her registration, Elizabeth Evelina Rose Pinkerton-Smith."
I'm sure 15 or 20 years ago, more than one surname was considered pretentious by many or had class associations.