I find this sort of contribution bizarre (no offence babadoc)
“Our community dentists could always predict exactly which kids, in any school they visited, would have tooth decay needing treatment, without examining them. They just looked at the names in their form register.
So sadly, yes, names do seem to have a class bias.”
In the same way, a family member worked in child protection for 20 years and could immediately tell you a child protection name. So you’re totally right.
However, you seem to be mixing up WORKING CLASS with NEGLECTFUL PARENTING which is just utterly bonkers.
I’ll say it again. The vast majority of this country are working class. The vast majority of children are not called lexi-May, or Chardonnay (how fucking 1996 is that one?) or Jayden.
The most popular names, which are dominated by working class children are, by one of many lists:
Boys
Oliver - 6,259
Harry - 5,031
George - 4,929
Noah - 4,273
Jack - 4,190
Jacob - 3,968
Leo - 3,781
Oscar - 3,739
Charlie - 3,724
Muhammad - 3,691
Girls
Olivia - 5,204
Amelia - 4,358
Isla - 3,373
Ava - 3,289
Emily - 3,121
Isabella - 2,627
Mia - 2,590
Poppy - 2,527
Ella - 2,452
Lily - 2,405
These are working class names. Alright?