Active discussions

Best Amazon Prime Day deals: Mumsnet favourites

Best Amazon Prime Day deals:
Mumsnet favourites

Shop now

Please or to access all these features

Talk
Baby names

Find baby name inspiration and advice on the Mumsnet Baby Names forum.

Original poster

Is this awful?

35 replies

JojoMags · 10/02/2011 14:05

Hugh Lee?

Lee is our surname. Does the combination of Hugh and Lee sound like a chinese takeway dish (as my MIL rudely suggested!) I know longer first names would be better but most boys names I like a short, one syllable. (Hugo has been vetoed by DH so this is not a viable alternative).

OP posts:
Are your children’s vaccines up to date?
Set a reminder
Hedwig3 · 10/02/2011 14:07

'Hugely'...sorry.

TallulahDoesTheHula · 10/02/2011 14:08

Is it a bit strange together, sorry

CharlieBoo · 10/02/2011 14:09

You need something longer...sorry

LawrieMarlow · 10/02/2011 14:10

Sounds odd.

LadySanders · 10/02/2011 14:11

hugo lee is MUCH better, she says, unhelpfully

belgo · 10/02/2011 14:11

Agree, Hugo Lee is better. Not Hugh.

sonniebonnie · 10/02/2011 14:12

No, not good!

With Lee, I'd suggest a two syllable name ending in a consonant, for example:

Quentin Lee
Thomas Lee
Felix Lee
Marcus Leee

sonniebonnie · 10/02/2011 14:12

sorry about the last e...

belgo · 10/02/2011 14:12

I don't usually suggest this, but can you not give him a double barrelled surname, with your maiden name? Hugh would sound much better with another surname before the Lee.

Sarsaparilllla · 10/02/2011 14:15

Sorry I don't like it, it just doesn't sound right when you say the names together, I'd have a rethink personally :)

I agree with sonnniebonnie, a 2/3 syllable name sounds better with Lee

greenzebra · 10/02/2011 14:16

Yeah I agree I think you need a longer name

AllieW · 10/02/2011 14:24

Second the Hugo suggestion.

apples82 · 10/02/2011 14:31

I agree with either Hugo or a longer name, it sounds a bit like a sneeze to me Grin

flopsy1974 · 10/02/2011 14:54

Not keen.

flopsy1974 · 10/02/2011 14:55

Not keen.

tammytoby · 10/02/2011 15:06

Hugh Lee does not sound great, to be honest. Agree that a 2 syllable name would work much better (especially one that won't be shortened!).

From the suggestions above I like Marcus Lee and Quentin Lee. The problem with Thomas Lee is that it may become Tom Lee which isn't great again.

cheapFlower · 10/02/2011 15:10

sorry, yes. very awful IMHO.
I think you need at least 2 syllables for DS's first name.

GetOrfMoiLand · 10/02/2011 15:13

No - it sounds daft, I agree with your MIL.

If you want a one syllable name what about

James Lee
John Lee
Charles Lee
Jake Lee
Mark Lee
George Lee

GetOrfMoiLand · 10/02/2011 15:14

I can't think of any more one syllable boy names - I had to rack my brain to come up with that lot!

tammytoby · 10/02/2011 15:14

Just don't shorten Charles to Charlie - Charlie Lee Grin.

Sidge · 10/02/2011 15:24

It's the soft end to Hugh that doesn't work well with Lee, so I think you need a hard ending name such as

Marc(us)
Jon(athan)
Greg(ory)
Adam

rachel1970 · 10/02/2011 15:37

I agree. A 2 syllable name with a 'hard' ending sounds great with Lee. I like
Adam Lee
Quentin Lee
Tristan Lee

rachel1970 · 10/02/2011 15:39

And I'd avoid first names that get shortened to -y or -ie

such as Charlie Lee, Jamie Lee, Alfie Lee, Johny Lee etc.

PoorTaxPayer · 10/02/2011 16:25

Though I agree with the others that Hugh Lee doesn't sound brilliant, I felt a wee bit sorry for you so to make you feel better: it's not as bad as someone I went to school with who was called Hugh Janus. Seriously.
xx

Janoschi · 10/02/2011 16:46

Bruce?
Spike?

:-)