Please or to access all these features

Antenatal tests

Get updates on how your baby develops, your body changes, and what you can expect during each week of your pregnancy by signing up to the Mumsnet Pregnancy Newsletters.

1in 2 chance of Downs Syndrome

33 replies

jorisbonsonstoupe · 07/05/2021 10:34

I've just been told my baby has 1 in 2 risk of having DS AND 1 in 29 Edwards/Patt

Don't know what to think 😔

OP posts:
supollard · 07/05/2021 12:07

Hi OP,

I’m so sorry to hear this, have you been given options and some information on which markers have elevated your risk?

Hoping you have good support in real life. Take care xx

jorisbonsonstoupe · 07/05/2021 12:12

Thanks for your reply- my pappa a was 1.1 and the other one was very high but can't quite remember how high. I'm going for CVS. At the scan the Fold was only 1.5mm so I'm surprised.

OP posts:
supollard · 07/05/2021 12:18

Five years ago I was high risk (1:10 I believe). Largely based on a very high HCG result, although my NT was at the higher end of the accepted normal range too.

I had a CVS, it wasn’t as bad as I was expecting. I didn’t watch and it was a little uncomfortable but not terribly painful. I took it really easy afterwards and got my results a few days later. It was all clear and I then had further scans with a feral medicine consultant to ensure no other issues. My son is a very healthy and happy five year old now with no problems.

I hope you get the same outcome xx

supollard · 07/05/2021 12:18

Fetal medicine consultant! Not a feral one!

jorisbonsonstoupe · 07/05/2021 12:20

Feral- that made me smile GrinI'm 40 so expected the risk to be high just not the highest and for both Sad

OP posts:
NeedNewKnees · 07/05/2021 12:22

Hugs and a hand hold, OP. My thoughts are with you.

sofato5miles · 07/05/2021 12:24

My DS was 1:2 downs and 1:5 Edwards Patau. I had a CVS and the results came back negative. It was a horrendous time and my heart goes out to you. He is now 10 and fine. I do not want to give you false hope but i also want you to know that, really, you have to wait for a CVS and result.

Agonising and i wish you the best of luck.

jorisbonsonstoupe · 07/05/2021 12:38

Thank you and yes, we can only have the tests and wait. I guess our brains prepare us for the worst to protect t us x

OP posts:
sofato5miles · 07/05/2021 15:21

Yes, self preservation mode. You will soon have more information, though it feels like an enternity. Hugs

jorisbonsonstoupe · 07/05/2021 18:56

Thank you sofa Daffodil

OP posts:
Littlehoppe · 08/05/2021 07:51

Sorry to hear about your results. I was given greater than 1:2 and also very high chance for Pateu and Edwards. Sadly, the CVS confirmed T21. My story doesn't mean anything. You have 50% chance of a different outcome what I really hope you do. I only want you to know you aren't alone and give you a virtual hug because I know how difficult this time is. The waiting is the worst. Be kind to yourself xx

jorisbonsonstoupe · 08/05/2021 08:16

@Littlehoppe thank you, I want to hear all sides so I can mentally prepare. At least I won't have long to wait until we know for sure. It was a complete shock, this is baby number 5 for me but my partners first. I am still in denial thinking they must have got the test wrong, they don't work etc.

OP posts:
SarahD19 · 08/05/2021 12:25

I was high risk for Pataus and Edwards. CVS initially confirmed diagnosis of what was thought to be full trisomy 18, long-term culture 3 weeks later was mosaicism.

Due to healthy ultrasound and mosaic result, we had amniocentesis a month later (couldn’t do so earlier due to obstetric reasons). Initial amniocentesis was all clear. Long terms culture detected low levels of mosaic trisomy 18 that were too low to detect in rapid results.

Our baby has been born perfectly healthy although the pregnancy was a rollercoaster with very dire prognosis being put to us and termination put forward as “an option” more times than we could count (no disrespect if anyone has chosen this route, everyone’s circumstances are different).

Thinking of you and wishing you all the best xx

SomethingNastyInTheBallPool · 08/05/2021 12:35

My colleague was pregnant in her early 40s and had a 1:2 chance of DS. Her daughter was born without any genetic abnormalities. I was pregnant at 42 and had a 1:240 chance and normal NT (can’t remember the exact measurement) and my daughter was born with DS. This type of screening is notoriously inaccurate and incredibly stressful.

SomethingNastyInTheBallPool · 08/05/2021 12:36

Sorry - posted too soon. I’d push for a NIPT, OP. Best of luck. Flowers

SarahD19 · 08/05/2021 13:15

I would agree that NIPT does offer a more refined screening, particularly for older women. However bare in mind it is still only a screening and can result in still relatively high false alarms/high risk results.

If the uncertainty of screening is problematic, invasive testing may be a better option for you than more screening. However no prenatal test can provide a full picture, as my own circumstances demonstrate X

SarahD19 · 08/05/2021 13:25

*bear in mind

jorisbonsonstoupe · 08/05/2021 14:27

Hi Sarah, what did you have? X

OP posts:
SarahD19 · 08/05/2021 14:34

@jorisbonsonstoupe I went for CVS and amniocentesis. For Edwards and Pataus, particularly for my age group at that time, NIPT would not have provided robust results. Also I would’ve had to have gone private.

jorisbonsonstoupe · 08/05/2021 14:36

I've got CVS arranged for Tuesday- does that give more or less definitive results?

OP posts:
TheVanguardSix · 08/05/2021 14:41

CVS and amnio are absolutely definitive, OP.
I am terribly sorry that you're here, in this place of complete and utter anxiety. I've been through it twice... consecutive pregnancies. My outcomes were not happy ones but I've had friends at more risk than I who had very happy outcomes. The CVS will tell you where you stand, definitively.
It's a bit premature, but do keep ARC in the back of your mind. I didn't carry on with my pregnancies (that was the choice I made but many others don't make this choice). The ARC forum was a lifeline for me. Also the ARC website is very informative regarding antenatal testing.

I'm thinking of you and sending you all of the luck in the world for Tuesday. www.arc-uk.org/

TheVanguardSix · 08/05/2021 14:43

Just to add, the CVS is as difinitive as the amnio, it just doesn't test for as many disorders as amnio. But it rules out the most common trisomies.

SarahD19 · 08/05/2021 14:48

@jorisbonsonstoupe unfortunately no prenatal test is definitive. As per my pp explaining my bizarre/mixed results.

Make sure you await long term culture results. Our initial CVS indicated full Edwards. Yet we went on to have a healthy baby.

Circumstances including confined placental mosaicism or vanishing twin syndrome for instance, can mean placental chromosomes do not reflect baby’s. It is unusual but more common than people realise (at least a lot of evidence increasingly suggests this).

jorisbonsonstoupe · 08/05/2021 14:49

Thank you. I was completely unaware of this!

OP posts:
SarahD19 · 08/05/2021 15:32

@jorisbonsonstoupe it’s one of a few reasons the limits NIPT so much. NIPT aims to test cell free dna from placenta. Although maternal health issues can also minimise NIPT accuracy. Additionally there is no long term culture to test for mosacism with NIPT x

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is closed and is no longer accepting replies. Click here to start a new thread.