yesterday my DDs godfather (who is also my DHs best friend) called and asked my DH if they could meet up at a soft play centre today. My dh told the GF (godfather) that he would speak to me and get back to him.
I said that it wouldn't be practical as DS1 has a tennis match and since my DH is one of our son's tennis coaches, he normally takes DS1 to the matches.
the GF the says that he will just take our DD (aged 11) to the soft play. I said to my DH that wasn't fair as (1)DD is too old and finds the soft play a bit babyish, (2) our little one (aged 5) wouldn't be particularly happy to be left with me and not taken out with his sister to soft play and (3) the only reason that GF wants to take my DD is so that he can sit back and let my DD watch his 2 year old son.
My DH got really huffy with me and said that I was being rude. He called the GF back and said that I had said no. GF says that if he can't take my DD, he won't go as he wanted my DD to help him with his boys (one aged 2 and one aged 9 months). That means that the GF girl friend (who doesn't work) doesn't get any child free time.
So should I let my DD be a babysitter in a soft play? I think it is too much responsibility.... if the 2 yr old gets hurt my DD will feel responsible. Both the GF and his girlfriend have their parents and siblings living fairly close to them so if they want a babysitter, surely they should ask one of their family members to help?
My DD adores babies and toddlers but I don't think she should have her good nature being taken advantage of.
We once went to a local farm (which includes a children's play area inside and out and rides for all ages etc) with them all and everytime my DD went on something, she was asked to take the 2 year old with her which meant that she couldn't go off and be a child herself.
Am I being a bit PBFish?