I have always worked. Always. I was made redundant 11 weeks ago so have been on Income Support (I have a 5yr old dc) since then.
I start work next week in my new job. My employer has said all new starters will receive their first pay 24th Feb as we will have missed the payroll for this month - which is fair enough. They are a huge company and very well known, they have told me they do not give pay advances under any circumstances.
I just called the benefits helpline and have been informed that my Income Support stops the day I start my job. Surely it should be the day you get paid? That is the day you actually have your wages in order to support yourself. That would make far too much sense.
But... if you have been on Jobseekers or income support more than 26 weeks you get given a "back to work bonus" to help cover your bills/food etc until you get your first pay. If you have been out of work for over a year not only do you get this but you also get regular monthly payments for a set period as part of an extra back to work bonus. WTF? How unbelieveably backward is that? It would cost them more to pay me I/S until I get to the 26 week date (another 15 weeks) than it would to pay me I/S until I get paid (6 weeks).
So, if I sat on my bum watching Jeremy Kyle, sitting on MN and eating cookies (as I have been) for another few months at the tax payers expense I'd be entitled to a bonus for this, but as I got a job quickly and will be paying back into "the pot" much sooner I get left with nothing. When I said I had a child to look after, bills to pay etc she said "but you get your monthly child benefit, couldn't you use that?" Oh yes! £80 a month child benefit - that wouldn't even pay the food bill.
As it happens, I do have some money I can use to tide me over and pay it back. BUT that's not the point. Many people - especially parents do not have spare cash or even friends and family to borrow from.
Annoyed me a bit.
Anyone agree with this?