Money is tight and my husband suggested that in order for us to have a holiday this year, we go away with his friend's family, who we are close to and share teh expense.
I was happy for this but then costs started to get out control. So I started to look at other ways for us to go away together that would please everyone but reduce the expense.
I have come with a solution that involves, dh, dd and I camping. His friends can stay in an apartment as they do not like the idea of camping (even though our tent is plenty big enough) I have also found out the cheapest place to hire a 7 seater to transport us all and enable to do day trips whilst away.
His friend however wants us all to stay together so we could split the cost of the apartment, but this would end up costing us £50 more than camping for the week.
He also wants us to take the afternoon (ie cheaper) train down there as this would cost less than hiring a car. But firstly I dont want to travel in the afternoon as we would lose a day of our holiday and also in the long run I think a car would work out cheaper as we wouldn't have to use public transport whilst away.
DH wants a peaceful life - and a holiday away with his friend so is saying IABU. His argument is that once we have got the stuff we still to get for camping (sleeping bags, table and stove)our holiday will cost more than theirs in the apartment.
There is also the added point that I'm not sure if I can live with another family for 7 nights and have a happy holiday.
So who is being unreasonable, dh or I?