This is not a rant about 'Why have other people got more than me', just something that got me thinking... Watching BBC breakfast this morning about companies that allow you to pay all year then get stuff for Christmas, like Fairpack who went bust a few years ago. A couple were talking about their experiences and how they used this service because they were low income and did not trust themselves not to spend the money on other stuff if they had it in a savings account. Fair enough, a good way of making sure you have the Christmas you want. The report then went on to say that a hamper of fresh fruit/veg from this company would cost over £38 but in the supermarket would cost around £13, so this family are losing out in a major way even though they are trying to budget their money. Was starting to feel bad for this couple who were so obviously trying to be careful with money. BUT THEN it went on to say 'this couple spent £400 on presents for their children, but could have saved £100 on the high street'. I know that people of all incomes can choose to spend money on whatever they like but seriously, in what world does anyone spend £400 on presents for their children at Christmas?? IMHO reports like these will contribute hugely to the view that is so often reflected on MN, that people on low incomes or who claim benefits seem to have more disposable income than you would think. The report was showing how people with limited finds can buy goods by saving throughout the year, a positive message to put across to stop the snobbery about people in different income brackets being able to afford more/less than they 'should' be able to, however was ruined at the end by the message that these people have to save all year to have a nice Christmas day and yet will spend £400 on gifts, more than some of us spend on the whole of Christmas! No wonder people make judgements...