Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Mumsnet is becoming a politics whore?

92 replies

Swedes2Turnips0 · 18/11/2009 22:09

Surely we should be observing and commenting on the forthcoming election as and when we want to? And criticising and/or applauding government policy as and when we see fit? And definitely not performing like seals for Newsnight or for anyone else.

I can't even be bothered to look up the spelling of vaccuum -- it would be quite reassuring for someone to refer me to pedants' corner.

AIBU?

OP posts:
TerryWoganscock · 18/11/2009 22:11
Biscuit
Alibabaandthe40nappies · 18/11/2009 22:17

YANBU

I read some of the Newsnight thread and really felt quite uncomfortable at the thought that the views of a very vocal few will be taken as representative of opinion on here.

scottishmummy · 18/11/2009 22:27

for right amount of money mn will be any ole whore you want her to be

dear god how dear us wee burds not know our place.wimmin commenting on politics.they will want the vote next

ronshar · 18/11/2009 22:33

Tis shocking (as I have rapidly turned over the TV to watch newsnight).

Swedes2Turnips0 · 18/11/2009 22:34

Are we a focus group?

OP posts:
Swedes2Turnips0 · 18/11/2009 22:36

The joke is the politicians aren't really interested in what Mumsnetters have to say AT ALL, just who they are going to vote for. It's like your best friend having a cad for a boyfriend.

OP posts:
Alibabaandthe40nappies · 18/11/2009 22:37

We are the new and interesting angle, for the moment.

scottishmummy · 18/11/2009 22:38

no one can influence mn as it isnt a construct. mn isnt a pressure group or homogeneous mass it is a forum for individuals.

ronshar · 18/11/2009 22:44

Scottishmummy you often say things that are good. That was great.

MadameDefarge · 18/11/2009 22:44

punditry is part and parcel of politics.

If people want MNetters to act as pundits, they can, if you don't want to take part, don't.

Its like saying oh I can't be bothered to vote, but don't let the people I disagree with vote...

blueywhite · 18/11/2009 22:45

"Vacuum"

I agree, there's no one MN voice.

Sometimes you do get a groundswell of popular opinion at large, that is reflected on MN, and then the politicos could learn something from reading on here.

But we're a fairly diverse crew

MadameDefarge · 18/11/2009 22:46

I do feel that on most political threads there is always a wide variety of political opinions expressed....

ronshar · 18/11/2009 22:48

Jst ask Daftpunk.

MadameDefarge · 18/11/2009 22:49

indeed, and a fair few others as well.

bibbitybobbityhat · 18/11/2009 22:49

I'm another I think.

Or am I?

Don't know what I think about all this, actually. Will have a think

But can I just say ... 800,000 members? Really?

colditz · 18/11/2009 22:50

Well, I hold the view that as nobody is forcing you to speak up, complaining about those who do speak up borders on censorship!

I didn't speak up before because it didn't occur to me. In all honestly I am more concerned about paying my water bill than who is running the country. But if someone asks my opinion, I will give it.

blueywhite · 18/11/2009 22:52

I guess the most brave articulate MNers are going to speak up and have their POV listened to.

But it's like that in all walks of life.

They probably glean more genuine opinion from a broader cross section by browsing random threads (which I'm sure some do) than from a specific thread asking for opinions.

Hassled · 18/11/2009 22:52

I don't understand the concern - we're not selling our souls, we're posting our thoughts about matters political on a public forum. If Newsnight want to know what I think about X, Y and Z, I'm more than happy to tell them.

And yes, their primary concern will be who we plan to vote for. But if DC were to discover that actually every single one of us plans to vote Lib Dem, then I can't imagine he's not interested as to why. He won't re-write Conservative policy as a result, but if our collective thoughts give any politician more of an insight into what parents are concerned about, that has to be a good thing.

You spelt vacuum right.

ronshar · 18/11/2009 22:53

I am a little bit scared that we will be taken over by dickhead political researchers. Starting threads just to do their work for them.

MadameDefarge · 18/11/2009 22:55

ah well, ronshar, journos have been doing that for years, and MN still seems to thrive!

Swedes2Turnips0 · 18/11/2009 22:57

ronshar - quite.

Hassled - But that Newsnight thread. It really isn't the voice of Mumsnet is it? It's a very few posters using the vote early and vote often tactic.

OP posts:
ronshar · 18/11/2009 22:59

Journo's are one thing. We get to see in the papers exactly who does their homework here.
Political ejits are alot more suspicious.

MadameDefarge · 18/11/2009 23:01

well, its not like there was lots of forewarning - those who could post, and were interested enough did, and a broad enough section of political opinion was voiced.

Twas a quick snapshot, and not entirely unrepresentitive of many MNetters views...

scottishmummy · 18/11/2009 23:01

there is no mn voice.we are not a collective commune.there is no mn consensus or ethos.we are individual's with pc and opinions

Hassled · 18/11/2009 23:01

It's the voice of the MNers who were interested enough to post. Which is all anyone starting one of those "The Media Needs You!" threads can hope for. The MN Census results are way more representative, I agree.

I just thought of something relevant and interesting to say and now it's completely gone. I cannot hold a thought anymore. I wonder if Newsnight care about premature dementia?