I think fledtoscotland makes a good point there - if we phone up or contact the surgery wanting something for medical reasons, it is not helpful to have receptionists second-guess things in a judgemental, amateur way, aka the "Have you tried cream?" approach I mentioned earlier, or "You sound too young to need a home visit".
Also it's a problem of assymetrical information. If you phoned up and explained that most of your family was ill in bed with persistent diarrhoea and vomiting you were really worried about, and the receptionist explained that the GP had three palliative care cancer patients to get around to and two over 90s to sort out before they could even hope to get to you, it would allow for a more intelligent conversation about options and what was in the best interests of the children in particular.
Again, I do feel my surgery is a bit more attuned to this than many others, and they will talk it through with you in a sensible way so you don't feel too patronised or neglected. I have a lot more trust in their judgement as a result of this and I think there is a good fit between what I think I need and what they are happy to provide.
On reflection, this country does seem obsessed with triaging, rationing and queueing however. I haven't experienced that in other parts of Europe - you just ask to be seen and a suitable person sees you. I wonder if it is a cultural thing over here, as are passive aggressive patients and receptionists and the associated friction.
Interestingly, I heard that the A and E department at King's (I think) once got rid of triage for the day once to see what would happen, and sat the consultants in the cubicles instead. Apparently the improved efficiency was such that they cleared the department of patients for the first time ever! So do we always need to triage?