I know i'm turning into the bloody Bounty defence party of one here (lonely party of one at the moment too!)but there are certain issues that maybe I feel differently to you all about.
Firstly businesses exist to make money, Mumsnet, Boden, Shell and yes Bounty too I don't have a problem with that.
I'm not saying all things capitalist are a great idea but I appreciate that businesses exist to make money, some by selling things/promoting things we may not like/agree with sometimes in a way that we may not be happy with. For this latter point hopefully regulations will exist which can successfully stop any unlawful practices.
I keep saying that without the Hospital's prior permission no Bounty woman would get within a whisker of the wards, hospitals can and do ban Bounty so it's not impossible.
Secondly, in response to Stretch, how do the Bounty packs promote FF over BF??
I want to state here that until very recently I have never visited the Bounty website, in fact despite receiving the MW Bounty pack on my first visit I wasn't even aware they had a website/forum (you all on here have done a good viral advertisement of it for them). I'm in the dark as my baby's only due in 2010 but does the Bounty woman promote FF over BF actively or does she simply give out a pack that apparently now doesn't even have FF ads in there, I'm confused.
The MW and HV are really on task with encouraging BF (did you see my earlier post about my friend who's had a double mastectomy and was still asked why she had said no to BF (even though her cancer was in her notes!!!)
To me a leaflet and some promo literature in a pack does not equate to pressure to FF in the same way that actual pressure from the MW does (speaking as a woman who fully intends to BF and has not bought 1 single bottle!). I'm not talking about the Bounty forum as thats not even in the title of this AIBU and I've no experience of it.
Thirdly (and finally) in response to QofFucking everything. I have never once implied or suggested that Bounty are unknowing participants (in what??) They're a business, set up to make money, they have business models and proposals that are presented to and accepted by the majority of hospitals, for what?? the evil or marketing baby focused materials and other crap that new mums may be interested in.
The security photo scheme sounds stupid in the extreme and the clue that it's not hospital only may be in the line she gives when stating you can buy the pics after, why would anyone want to?? Unless of course they're nice professional pics and if so where's the harm? No-one is forcing anyone. Really in an age of digital photography and instant cameras I find it really hard to believe that the Bounty photo if the first pic taken of any baby.
Argh I can't limit myself to 3 points, to Angry Wasp, Don't you opt in to the Bounty pack just as you would opt into Mumsnet?? The Bounty woman asks for your details, you say no (if you'd rather not or you say yes if you don't mind) I know you've said on more than one occasion that "after birth you are psychologically vulnerable" and as I've not given birth yet I won't argue with you on that one but I'd hope that I'd be able to say no to someone asking for my details if I didn't want to give them.
However if i was too vulnerable then I'd be very cross with the care givers around me for letting her in to see me whilst in such a state, and I'd be much more inclined to give them jip as they would and should have more than some idea about my state than the hapless Bounty woman who having been given prior permission to be on the ward would have no idea where was out of bounds unless told by someone who does eg the nurses/midwives
Also I don't think I ever said that government campaigns should be started immediately post birth but I have gone on a bit so I best leave it eh? Thanks for a good debate, you've made me think.