Again, "proof" of god demanded. I thought we'd moved past that stage in the argument.
What reasoned arguments would you like?
The problem with belief is that people want it to be "respected", and if they want it to be respected they ought to find some reason for it to be considered as anything more than a delusion. It's not up to us to show that it's illusory - it's up to you to show that it's real. This is the basis of every scientific argument - what seems like a lack of respect is, in fact, enormous respect, because it's saying "You have a theory, very well, please show me the evidence." Despite this opportunity being given, religion fails every time.
A lot of the time, what seems like faith not being "respected" is simply faith being given the same treatment as any other extraordinary claim. And it is an extraordinary claim. It may not seem so to someone who has been brought up with it or who is currently within its parameters, but that's part of the problem. The sticking-point is that, from within a position of faith, god seems perfectly reasonable. It's only when you are able to step outside a faith's boundaries that you see how ridiculous it can appear.
The person making the extraordinary claim is the one who needs to provide the evidence. Why should the world be run around your superstition, any more than anyone else's? Why don't we take the kids up to a stone circle every morning to worship the rising of the sun? Or sacrifice goats on an altar in the school hall? Special pleading, that's why.
This is why (deliberately) silly analogies like tooth fairies and invisible pink unicorns are brought in, because a religious belief might as well be those. I could claim they exist and that "there is no evidence they don't", whereas in fact the evidence that they don't is overwhelming.