Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Would Labour voters be upset if joining the EU meant they could no longer tax children’s education?

909 replies

Blarneyspoco · 04/10/2026 12:03

Taxing children’s education is banned as part of EU membership. If the U.K. rejoined the EU, would Labour supporters be upset that they can no longer levy the tax or would it be seen as a necessary compromise.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
6
RoseyMonkeychop · 05/10/2026 18:22

Laurmolonlabe · 05/10/2026 18:19

Actually it's not a tax it has just lost it's exemption, it could be worse they could revoke their charitable status, that would really sting - strange the EU would ban tax on education but is abundantly happy with VAT on books.

Oh that doesn’t sound good, what would happen if they lost their charitable status?

strawberrybubblegum · 05/10/2026 18:23

HandPulledNoodles · 05/10/2026 18:09

As you said please...

My argument is that there is no compelling reason for private school fees to retain their specific VAT exemption. That does not create a general rule that every good or service which provides an educational advantage must therefore be taxed. Having a tutor is an advantage for instance.

You only get from “private school fees should be subject to VAT” to “therefore books should be too” by inserting a premise I have repeatedly told you I don’t hold: that advantage itself is what determines VAT liability.

Just before you go:

What's the compelling reason for books to retain their specific VAT exemptions?

Please 😁

I'd really like to test that reason against private school fees.

New book sales in the UK are valued at £7.4 billion. That's pretty similar to the £10billion on private school fees,so could raise a simar amount of tax.

mylifestory · 05/10/2026 18:24

NicolaSturgeon · 04/10/2026 12:19

There will be quite a few things we will have to accept that won't be popular if we ever get a chance to rejoin. That is why it will be very unlikely in my view.

How? Most UK laws are still fully harmonised with the EU. The only other realised Brexit Benefit I can think of besides VAT on private education is the ability to close airspace up to 24 hours earlier. They haven't even managed to enable the variance of VAT across the constituent countries of the UK yet.

The only problem I can see about having to reverse VAT on education is the red tape and finding another source for the resultant monies that are supposed to be committed to hiring teachers for state primaries and secondary schools, but that's a drop in the ocean compared to the massive amounts of administrative fallout we're still buried under from "leaving".

not committed to hiring teachers as that money is now going to housing instead, apparently. cant u see all those ppl now have free houses .....

RoseyMonkeychop · 05/10/2026 18:26

HandPulledNoodles · 05/10/2026 18:09

As you said please...

My argument is that there is no compelling reason for private school fees to retain their specific VAT exemption. That does not create a general rule that every good or service which provides an educational advantage must therefore be taxed. Having a tutor is an advantage for instance.

You only get from “private school fees should be subject to VAT” to “therefore books should be too” by inserting a premise I have repeatedly told you I don’t hold: that advantage itself is what determines VAT liability.

Private schools didn’t have a specific VAT exemption, children aged 5-18 in full time education had a vat exemption from education services received. Anyone aged outside these ages still retains that vat exemption.

RoseyMonkeychop · 05/10/2026 18:41

SerendipityJane · 05/10/2026 18:21

It may be a mistake to assume that people who don't support the idea that private education should be VAT-free axiomatically support it's imposition.

I suspect many are fundamentally ambivalent. And if not many then at least one (me 😀). In the scale of things I care about, it's a nothingburger.

Ha ha, I have a few more assumptions about people who support this tax after that recent conversation. That was completely amazing and I’ve got to be honest, not totally surprising.

SerendipityJane · 05/10/2026 18:47

RoseyMonkeychop · 05/10/2026 18:41

Ha ha, I have a few more assumptions about people who support this tax after that recent conversation. That was completely amazing and I’ve got to be honest, not totally surprising.

I'm just here to count the ways the argument against VAT on private schooling can be portrayed.

Rather disappointed that no one has ferreted out a quote from the Bible* to demonstrate that education is a sacred practice. Although I asked ChatGPT and it referred me to the book of Ofsted.

*Other texts are available.

EasternStandard · 05/10/2026 18:48

SerendipityJane · 05/10/2026 18:47

I'm just here to count the ways the argument against VAT on private schooling can be portrayed.

Rather disappointed that no one has ferreted out a quote from the Bible* to demonstrate that education is a sacred practice. Although I asked ChatGPT and it referred me to the book of Ofsted.

*Other texts are available.

Or arguments for it.

mylifestory · 05/10/2026 18:50

chirrupybird · 04/10/2026 12:42

It's just businesses paying VAT, just use the free state education system if you don't like it.

free state education cant cater for many kids. putting them in private school frees up places in state for those who cannot afford it and needs extra help

SerendipityJane · 05/10/2026 18:54

EasternStandard · 05/10/2026 18:48

Or arguments for it.

Generally you can use religion to prove anything. Or so it seems.

anon666 · 05/10/2026 18:58

Don't be daft. No-one cared. No-one cares.

Except for the people who were paying it, who cared deeply.

The main reason it generated so much of a backlash on here were the stupidly exaggerated predictions of "the end of the world as we know it".

Also the vindictiveness towards the state education system, predicting all the "ordinary kids" that would be displaced.

All the hand wringing was just so privileged, and it was disproportionate. It came over so badly.

No-one will care if rejoining the EU reverses it. There is more at stake than your selfish personal privileges. There always was.

SemiRetiredLoveGoddeess · 05/10/2026 19:00

Maybe families who have a joint income of £100,000 and pay to send their kids to private school. Will be able to claim the vat back?

Re the latest Conservative nonsense on their poor hard up poverty stricken, starving supporters and financial help with pre school kids.

Maybe if we returned to the EU. Brussels could make a special case for them.

RoseyMonkeychop · 05/10/2026 19:02

SerendipityJane · 05/10/2026 18:54

Generally you can use religion to prove anything. Or so it seems.

I have absolutely no doubt there will be religious text to back up not teaching the ‘wrong’ things to children. Todays Labour have a lot in common with the religious zealots of old.

Laurmolonlabe · 05/10/2026 19:08

If they lost their charitable status they would have to pay tax like the rest of us- on all their property which in the case of a school like Eton runs into hundreds of millions because they own the whole town.
Personally I would not have VAT on the fees but I would tax the schools on their overall wealth, which is sometimes considerable, but in the case of more minor public schools can be quite modest- so it would be far fairer.

RoseyMonkeychop · 05/10/2026 19:21

@SemiRetiredLoveGoddeess Combined income of £100k was always fine for pre school assistance, it’s if one person earns over £100k where it was cut off. So £10k and £90k you’re golden, but £100k and £0 no you’re a rich privileged undeserving areshole. Tories are absolutely right, we need to stop excluding the people who pay for all public services from them.

Zzxzzz · 05/10/2026 19:30

HandPulledNoodles · 05/10/2026 16:52

Evil? Tad melodramatic.

We’ve already established that private education is bought because it is perceived to confer advantages over the state sector otherwise people wouldn’t pay tens of thousands of pounds for it. Children who attend private schools have advantages that many children in state schools simply do not, yet they ultimately compete for the same university places, graduate schemes and jobs.

You can think VAT is the wrong way to address that, but describing a tax on the purchase of that advantage as “evil” is ridiculous. It’s a tax policy you disagree with, not an assault on education as OP puts.

It is evil. It is an assault on education. Can't wait till it gets scrapped

Butterflyfluff · 05/10/2026 19:34

@Blarneyspoco what are you trying to achieve with all these threads?

It’s clear that virtually no one agrees with or supports your views.

And most importantly, the VAT on private school fees isn’t going to change anytime soon.

And you can’t afford to pay it.

So what is your desired outcome?

Because you can’t just delay your children’s education until you can afford to put them back in private school.

And if you are this obsessed about this IRL you’ll also alienate anyone around you as well.

Gengha · 05/10/2026 19:39

Zzxzzz · 05/10/2026 19:30

It is evil. It is an assault on education. Can't wait till it gets scrapped

Of course it’s not “evil” get a grip

LoftyPlumLion · 05/10/2026 19:44

I think vat on private schools is the right policy, but I would sacrifice that if it meant rejoining the eu.

LizzieW1969 · 05/10/2026 19:50

LoftyPlumLion · 05/10/2026 19:44

I think vat on private schools is the right policy, but I would sacrifice that if it meant rejoining the eu.

That’s how I feel. I voted remain in 2016 and I would put rejoining over VAT on private education.

RoseyMonkeychop · 05/10/2026 19:53

Butterflyfluff · 05/10/2026 19:34

@Blarneyspoco what are you trying to achieve with all these threads?

It’s clear that virtually no one agrees with or supports your views.

And most importantly, the VAT on private school fees isn’t going to change anytime soon.

And you can’t afford to pay it.

So what is your desired outcome?

Because you can’t just delay your children’s education until you can afford to put them back in private school.

And if you are this obsessed about this IRL you’ll also alienate anyone around you as well.

I agree with @Blarneyspoco and the tax will be gone within 3 years. Tories, Reform, Lib Dem’s, Restore and the EU have all stated they will reverse or in the EUs case ban it.
The stigma of being the party to make children’s education vatable will follow Labour around every time they bring up education.

Butterflyfluff · 05/10/2026 19:57

RoseyMonkeychop · 05/10/2026 19:53

I agree with @Blarneyspoco and the tax will be gone within 3 years. Tories, Reform, Lib Dem’s, Restore and the EU have all stated they will reverse or in the EUs case ban it.
The stigma of being the party to make children’s education vatable will follow Labour around every time they bring up education.

So the OPs children will have been in state school for 5 years by then……

RoseyMonkeychop · 05/10/2026 20:00

Butterflyfluff · 05/10/2026 19:57

So the OPs children will have been in state school for 5 years by then……

I haven’t read the entire thread, so I don’t know her kids ages.

Plmnki · 05/10/2026 20:41

You seem a tad unhinged about paying VAT it seems.

however I have great news! Simply send your children to a local comprehensive and you won’t pay VAT, so your children’s education will be untaxed.

Hurrah!

Lugol · 05/10/2026 20:48

EasternStandard · 05/10/2026 18:11

EU countries probably have their own issues to focus on.

Both things can be true.

Lugol · 05/10/2026 20:53

LoftyPlumLion · 05/10/2026 19:44

I think vat on private schools is the right policy, but I would sacrifice that if it meant rejoining the eu.

Taxing education is a disgrace.

Those parents were paying taxes of which state schools benefitted, not taking up a place in those schools (again the state schools benefitted) and now those private schools are closing, those kids are now in the state schools which were chronically oversubscribed anyway.

Now nobody benefits. Great policy 🙄