Help protect children from gaming harms.

Take our survey

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

AIBU to feel middle-class luxuries have become increasingly out of reach?

462 replies

cocobow · Yesterday 16:07

I had to go to the local shopping centre the other day to pick up a click and collect for my husband, new work shirts so nothing fancy! I thought why not make an afternoon of it as I rarely go shopping and I could maybe get a coffee and cake and even treat myself to a little something as my birthday is coming up.

I loved some of the clothes in places like monsoon and seasalt but it was all way too expensive dresses were £80 to £100 or more same with skirts which seemed to start at £65 and I know that isn't even considered expensive today but for me it is! I went for a look in the sephora as I love skincare but again it was all really expensive. The queue for the till was full of school girls buying things I wouldn't be able to buy for myself!

To be fair they were probably there spending birthday money and probably aren't spending money like that all the time. I suppose it just feels like the goal posts on these admittedly luxury items have been moved since I was in my teens and early 20's when I imagined that by my 40's I'd be able to at least buy some of these things or buy nice clothes now and then. My husband and I both degree and post graduate educated and work in professional jobs but we have to prioritise bills, the kids and food over luxuries. To be fair we have no debt at all and we will save for an buy large purchases cash mostly but I admit to feeling a bit personally deprived at times! When my mum was my age she worked in a call centre part time in the evenings and would go round the shops most weekend and buy herself a new top or other item of clothes and exclusively used clarins skincare, I use the ordinary, cerave or boots and superdrug own brand mostly and my clothes come from charity shops. My parents were working class made good but their disposable income seemed to go a lot further than mine does. We don't even have a large mortgage.

DH and I recently looked at taking a short trip to London as a joint birthday present to each other but the cost was so expensive we seem to have quietly shelved the idea.

In the end I had a look in waterstones but even that was expensive, since when are paperbacks routinely £14.99! I never even had a coffee or bit of cake as the selection of cakes looked dry and unappetizing but would still have cost £10 in total.

Am I being unreasonable to think the cost of a middle class lifestyle with a few luxuries has had the goalposts moved by quite some amount?

OP posts:
nomas · Yesterday 21:31

Noodledog · Yesterday 21:28

£10 is less than minimum wage. I'm sure you'll say it's fine because the haircut takes less than an hour, but really? You consider £10 a reasonable amount to pay for an experienced hairdresser? You remind me of my ex MIL who loved talking about how little she paid for haircuts. Ironically, a middle class, liberal Labour voter. Wouldn't surprise me if she's on MN talking about how fantastic Andy Burnham is.

You’re right, it is low. It does take her 10
mins though. It’s 2 inches off the bottom, no layers.l, no shampoo.

Papyrophile · Yesterday 21:40

I can get a bit exercised about the value of work. IM not even slightly humble opinion, most people try to deliver too much too fast, and fall short. I'd rather pay a bit more to have the job done well. Probably in a minority though.

dingodan · Yesterday 21:41

The average family saves 2k a month @foursquares 😆😆

GaIadriel · Yesterday 21:43

nomas · Yesterday 21:31

You’re right, it is low. It does take her 10
mins though. It’s 2 inches off the bottom, no layers.l, no shampoo.

So, £60 an hour. Which isn't half bad.

the80sweregreat · Yesterday 21:43

Do people save 2k a month ? Really ?

Papyrophile · Yesterday 21:45

@dingodan , at which stages of life though? We saved, but very little. We made investments in our early 40s that are still delivering a sensible income now we're 70.

HollyhocksandPeons · Yesterday 21:45

Sorry, me with my old thing again - there is no middle class - there is only bourgeoisie who live off their capital and don't have to work and there is working class - who have to work for a living - it includes doctors and university professors as well - because they WORK for a living. Obviously, there are richer working class people who earn more and poorer working class people, who earn less. Also, there are skilled working class people - surgeons, dentists, teachers and unskilled ones, even though I struggle to name a job that did not require a skill. And the sooner we realise that, the better for everyone - i.e. these mythical 'middle class luxuries' will stop playing on people's minds.

there is working class (it includes professionals, like doctors and architects and teachers)

GaIadriel · Yesterday 21:46

MeetMeOnTheCorner · Yesterday 20:57

@likeafishneedsabike There is a huge problem saying we can live without “stuff”. I think we should live without some stuff but only if you have bought wisely so things last.

However turning your back on buying anything just puts people out of work. I’ve just read The Times today: VW in Germany is planning to cut 100,000 jobs. Yes, I had to read it twice too. We just buy Chinese cars now and look what that means for German and other workers! Yes, bring it on say all the anti capitalist nerds. It’s a brilliant idea isn’t it until it’s your family without a job?

Plus what about the tax take? We need people employed and paying taxes. 6th form politics and illogical economics should stay in school. There will be no money to do anything if we don’t work!

But it's also a vicious circle buying stuff to keep people making stuff. It's a bit like perpetuating debt by taking out new loans to pay off old loans.

nomas · Yesterday 21:47

GaIadriel · Yesterday 21:43

So, £60 an hour. Which isn't half bad.

Yes, and it’s drop in.

Papyrophile · Yesterday 21:48

@HollyhocksandPeons I do love a class warrior. Knock yourself out love.

SweetnsourNZ · Yesterday 21:48

FlyingPC · Yesterday 16:31

I think many who think they are middle class, or have ever been, are misguided about what it means to be middle class.

An £80 top is not middle class.

If you recall, Kate Middleton (as she was known then) came from a 'middle class' family. They lived in a large, detached home in a prestigious area and send her to an elite university.

Her tops weren't £80. Although she was labelled as 'middle class' most of us would view her family to be extremely wealthy.

I think most of Britain is, at best, lower class and there are some upper lower class. Most people are living in poverty or just the basic standard of other countries like Australia/USA etc.

You will find this to be true if you travel and see the very shocking differences in the standards of livings between Britain and other 'wealthy' countries.

Britain is not a wealthy country nor does it have a wealthy population. Once we understand that, then we probably won't feel so bad when we can't afford that 'middle class' top for £80 and just accept our Primark polyester equivalent at £20.

On the other hand, accept that inflation for substandard tops at £80 is what the going rate is now for cheap clothing.

It's not a class thing. It's inflation with stagnant wages where the poor are becoming poorer.

I agree. I remember hearing about the professional class as a child, which I think covered educated people on an above modest income, but not actually wealthy like the middle class.

GaIadriel · Yesterday 21:48

HollyhocksandPeons · Yesterday 21:45

Sorry, me with my old thing again - there is no middle class - there is only bourgeoisie who live off their capital and don't have to work and there is working class - who have to work for a living - it includes doctors and university professors as well - because they WORK for a living. Obviously, there are richer working class people who earn more and poorer working class people, who earn less. Also, there are skilled working class people - surgeons, dentists, teachers and unskilled ones, even though I struggle to name a job that did not require a skill. And the sooner we realise that, the better for everyone - i.e. these mythical 'middle class luxuries' will stop playing on people's minds.

there is working class (it includes professionals, like doctors and architects and teachers)

Working class never solely meant 'those that work'.

cocobow · Yesterday 21:49

Gibgertea · Yesterday 18:10

Nobody needs to buy new books and should be using their library. Authors get paid when libraries buy their book and every time a book is borrowed. If we don’t use libraries we really will lose them. No way am I spending a grand on books every year when I don’t need to.

I do use my local library to the full extent I can and always have books out but my local library doesn't have many of the books I want to read, they cater to what has broad mass appeal which is fair enough so lots of crime fiction, fantasy and so on if I enjoyed James Patterson or Stephen King then I'd probably be happy but I want to read Claire Louise Bennett, Olga Tokarczuk or Michel Houellebecq, even classics can be hard to come by and once popular writers like Bernice Rubens or Angela Carter, they don't even have books by them! I do buy second hand and I always check charity shops but I am longing to read Olga Tokarczuk's The Empusium which is £14.99 for a paperback new. If I get a voucher for my birthday I will probably get it.

OP posts:
Genevieva · Yesterday 21:50

Sea salt uses high quality organic fabrics, so it’s always been expensive. They have quite good sales though.

EasternStandard · Yesterday 21:51

GaIadriel · Yesterday 21:43

So, £60 an hour. Which isn't half bad.

It does sound low cost and fast still. Taking dc for a dry simple cut takes longer and is double plus that.

HollyhocksandPeons · Yesterday 21:52

GaIadriel · Yesterday 21:48

Working class never solely meant 'those that work'.

I am sorry, political economy clearly defines the working class or proletariat as those who have to sell their labour for wages. There has never been any other definition.

cocobow · Yesterday 21:52

Kelticgold · Yesterday 19:07

You are an adult now, your priorities have changed and that is normal. The girls buying expensive make up at sephora probably were not thinking “hmm no, I won’t buy it, I’ll put the money aside for my children’s university instead”

I get that, I even said I understand they are probably in there spending their birthday money. I am not deluded to think that everyone I see in at the shops is out spending like that every week or even every month.

OP posts:
GaIadriel · Yesterday 21:53

Britain is not a wealthy country nor does it have a wealthy population.

Depends on your definition of 'wealth'. The accepted statistic is that we're the 'fifth wealthiest country in the world' but people often actually mean quality of life.

cocobow · Yesterday 21:54

PussInBin20 · Yesterday 19:46

You’re not wrong. I mean I could afford an £80 dress if I wanted but it would have to be really special for that price.

Today I got an £80 dress in the sale for £35. There’s no way I would have bought it full price.

I like Fatface clothes but I only buy in their sales as I just can’t justify the price in my head for what the items are. I mean £65 for a flimsy skirt and £40 for a cotton top that probably cost a few pounds to produce in India. I like them but I am just not paying that.

I do like beauty products but I only get expensive stuff for birthdays/Xmas as a treat.

Look for the sales OP.

I am not a fan of shopping so usually miss the sales because I am just not aware of them but I will make an effort to check them out this year and maybe get a few things as what is in style this autumn is really nice.

OP posts:
GaIadriel · Yesterday 21:54

HollyhocksandPeons · Yesterday 21:52

I am sorry, political economy clearly defines the working class or proletariat as those who have to sell their labour for wages. There has never been any other definition.

So you assumed most middle class people didn't actually work?

MrsE1 · Yesterday 21:54

HollyhocksandPeons · Yesterday 21:45

Sorry, me with my old thing again - there is no middle class - there is only bourgeoisie who live off their capital and don't have to work and there is working class - who have to work for a living - it includes doctors and university professors as well - because they WORK for a living. Obviously, there are richer working class people who earn more and poorer working class people, who earn less. Also, there are skilled working class people - surgeons, dentists, teachers and unskilled ones, even though I struggle to name a job that did not require a skill. And the sooner we realise that, the better for everyone - i.e. these mythical 'middle class luxuries' will stop playing on people's minds.

there is working class (it includes professionals, like doctors and architects and teachers)

Absolutely, I’m a high rate tax payer. I’m still as working class as anyone. I have to work for a living.

SweetnsourNZ · Yesterday 21:55

Sunbringer · Yesterday 16:48

I think when you’ve got kids at home luxuries like this are deprioritised. When the kids leave home you then have the extra money for them. The age people have kids has moved later so people think by 40s they should have this spare post kids money but that’s more 50s now.

Edited

That's a good point. We think our parents started to come right at a certain age, even if they had more children then and mum maybe did not even work full time, but they probably had they family a decade earlier.

HollyhocksandPeons · Yesterday 21:55

GaIadriel · Yesterday 21:54

So you assumed most middle class people didn't actually work?

There is no middle class. I did not assume anything.

Allergictoironing · Yesterday 21:55

GaIadriel · Yesterday 21:43

So, £60 an hour. Which isn't half bad.

So how much is that after they've paid rent on the property, business council tax, heating, lighting, water (LOTS of water), other electricity costs like towel cleaning & drying, covering time off for holidays & sickness, replacing worn out equipment, scissor/blade sharpening. Or the cost of their "seat" in someone else's salon. And "dead" times when nobody comes in. Then tax & NI on what's left over.

Papyrophile · Yesterday 21:57

It sounds okay but the cost of providing a technical service is far more expensive. DH has a teeny, but specialist, engineering company, and £60 ph is only the price of going to do the survey. Fixing the problem could well cost several times that per hour once the requirement for materials is included.

Swipe left for the next trending thread