Well this is my argument with lottery funding.
in the sport I coach, that I’m obviously most familiar with, it’s very much discretionary over who gets the funding. It isn’t always the ones who are winning everything, it’s the ones the ptb like, or the coach they like, or the club.
so a 14 year old with no international competition record, but is at a good club or with a coach with an established record, will receive funding over an 18 year old who has won multiple junior European and world medals.
which of course then means that 18 year old can’t continue to the same level as they don’t have access to the support such as training camps, medical care, injury support, physio, nutrition etc. they can’t move to the better club as who pays the rent and living expenses? So then the 14 year old does get better, the 18 year old gives up, and the ptb say see, I told you so.
we’re talking at least 5k+ a year here. For a 14 year old living at home.
personally I think lottery funding should be limited to 18+ only. I’ve seen funded 12 year olds ffs. I’ve seen international competition where some kids have to pay their own way, but others go free. Dependent on the club/coach/whether they like the athlete, not who got the best result.
in the sport I coach if they took the funding away from the under 18’s they’ve decided will get an Olympic medal- I mean come on, no one can predict a 12 year olds Olympic future! They could set up funded “junior squads”, and use the money to pay for training costs, competition costs, support such as physio and nutrition. Take the top 10 in each age group.
then you are giving those who would maybe quit due to lack of funds or parental support a way to continue. Instead of one or two chosen ones getting everything.
Lottery funding that pays living costs should be adults only. I see many, many talented youngsters I simply can’t keep in the sport because they don’t get funding so they can’t see a way to continue past school.