Help protect children from gaming harms.

Take our survey

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Meta glasses at the school gate

175 replies

Minephotographercat · 24/08/2026 07:06

I know several Dads at our primary school own, and are big advocates of the meta glasses that can record people without them realising.

WIBU to email the school (without naming names) with my concerns that our children might be being recorded at the school gate?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
5
ThatBreezyScroller · 24/08/2026 14:13

FunnyOrca · 24/08/2026 12:58

I see absolutely no use for these glasses that isn’t borderline criminal.

Well apparently all the wannabe influencers think it’s very important that you see their daily life from their view.

Not technically criminal but so cringey that it should be.

ElsiePiddockSkipsinherSleep · 24/08/2026 14:21

GlosGirl82 · 24/08/2026 12:15

100% email the school - this is a proper risk. Why would a man want to secretly record children other than for a bad reason…

I’d hope and assume the school would give you short shrift.

It’s essentially the same logic as saying someone carrying a smartphone must be recording children for nefarious purposes because their phone has a camera. Or that someone wearing sunglasses must be hiding something. If there’s actual evidence that someone is recording children, of course raise it. But reporting people simply because they own a particular type of glasses is frankly hysterical.

Thatladdo · 24/08/2026 14:39

Covert recording equipment, around a school, potentialy secretly filming kids...

That just screams nonce.

Absolutely unacceptable, any arguement to try to justify them is as bad as wearing them. Creepy.

InAnyOtherLife · 24/08/2026 14:57

NeverLookInTheMirror · 24/08/2026 13:54

While I can see some of the concerns over the metta glasses and also the positives, the only thing which has really happened here is that the glasses have emphasised the amount of time people spend filming in public.

Nothing’s really changed in that regard. It’s just the method has, and now people are calling for the glasses in particular to be banned when in actual fact maybe what people need to be calling for is for filming in public to be banned.

Which is all very well, but if you’re looking for filming in public to be banned, how do we justify the fact that there is CCTV literally everywhere.. So if it’s wrong for individuals to film, then it’s wrong for CCTV to exist.

In terms of those saying that the glasses could literally mean the difference between someone with a visual impairment being able to collect their child from school and not, that’s frankly bullshit.

While some people with a VI do benefit from the functions of the glasses, there is nothing the glasses do which your phone doesn’t. In fact there are numerous apps on the phone which aren’t on the metta glasses.

And given they’ve only been around for about two years or so, are we suggesting that people with a visual impairment have gained a new lease of independence in the past two years all down to metta? As someone with a visual impairment I can tell you that’s not the case. Moreover, I seemed to manage to collect my child from school 20 years ago before any of this tech even existed.

I can assure you, from personal experience, its not 'bullshit'. And yes, I know of more than one VI person who has gained a new lease of independence thanks to them.
Your experience with your particular visual impairment is not the same as others. You cannot speak for all conditions and degrees of sight loss.

LatteLady · 24/08/2026 15:46

@Minephotographercat Just to manage expectations, you will not get a response from the school until they return in September (if you are in England). Whilst it is a safeguarding issue, it would not pass the threshold of necessitating an out of hours response unlike some other saeguarding issues for which there is a separate protocol.

AppropriateAdult · 24/08/2026 16:02

OP, this seems like a ludicrous overreach on your part. By your own admission there is nothing to suggest that anyone ‘in the school community’
has used these glasses inappropriately or otherwise at the school gates. So why on earth do
you feel it’s your place to pre-emptively ask the school to lay down rules?

SweetnsourNZ · 24/08/2026 16:06

SadiraOfTyr · 24/08/2026 09:46

Smartwatches don't have cameras built in, and even if they did it would be obvious if you were recording with it as you would be holding your wrist out in an unusual position. The problem with the pervert glasses is that it is very easy to film covertly. They have a small telltale light built into them that illuminates when recording but it is possible to disable it and it doesn't show well in sunlight anyway.

Oh okay thanks. Wasn't sure if they had cameras. Not up with all the different gadgets.

Minephotographercat · 24/08/2026 16:14

@LatteLady thanks, that's what I expected.

OP posts:
Mixerfixer · 24/08/2026 16:16

Mooselander · 24/08/2026 07:48

There is no expectation of privacy when you’re out and about in public.

I think it's perfectly reasonable to expect that people respect your privacy when out and about. There's no reasonable reason for anyone to record or take photos of anyone else going about their daily business.

Yes, I know it's not illegal to record or take photos in public spaces

Mixerfixer · 24/08/2026 16:18

ElsiePiddockSkipsinherSleep · 24/08/2026 14:21

I’d hope and assume the school would give you short shrift.

It’s essentially the same logic as saying someone carrying a smartphone must be recording children for nefarious purposes because their phone has a camera. Or that someone wearing sunglasses must be hiding something. If there’s actual evidence that someone is recording children, of course raise it. But reporting people simply because they own a particular type of glasses is frankly hysterical.

Not the same thing at all

Minephotographercat · 24/08/2026 16:20

@AppropriateAdult because, as many other posters including school governors have pointed out, safeguarding is everyone's responsibility. I've flagged a concern to the school, it's then up to them to decide whether it's warranted and if they want to take action or whether it's as you put it, a ludicrous overreach.

OP posts:
catsflorafauna · 24/08/2026 16:35

God I can’t imagine being married to a someone that wears these things. Loooooossssseeeerrrrsssss.

Yes bring it up to the school.

dibleydob · 24/08/2026 18:32

It’s essentially the same logic as saying someone carrying a smartphone must be recording children for nefarious purposes because their phone has a camera

Parents at my son's school play have literally been told off by the school for taking photos on their phone which included other people's kids so its exactly the same thing 🙄

Rondayvu · 24/08/2026 18:37

catsflorafauna · 24/08/2026 16:35

God I can’t imagine being married to a someone that wears these things. Loooooossssseeeerrrrsssss.

Yes bring it up to the school.

Pervy losers.

PinkyFlamingo · 24/08/2026 18:42

Minephotographercat · 24/08/2026 07:45

Interesting - the videos I've seen of it haven't looked that obvious, especially in daylight in a busy environment though I will admit I've not (to my knowledge) seen them in action in real life.

So what makes you think some Dad's are using them at school then?

dibleydob · 24/08/2026 18:47

catsflorafauna · 24/08/2026 16:35

God I can’t imagine being married to a someone that wears these things. Loooooossssseeeerrrrsssss.

Yes bring it up to the school.

Exactly - it would be like someone recording every interaction on their phone.

Gross 🤮

NeverLookInTheMirror · 24/08/2026 18:52

InAnyOtherLife · 24/08/2026 14:57

I can assure you, from personal experience, its not 'bullshit'. And yes, I know of more than one VI person who has gained a new lease of independence thanks to them.
Your experience with your particular visual impairment is not the same as others. You cannot speak for all conditions and degrees of sight loss.

I did say that there are people who have benefited from them, but there is literally nothing that you can do on the glasses that you can’t do on your phone other than that they can be used hands-free. Added to which the fact that the metta AI app is now so volatile that you practically have to factory reset the glasses every five minutes has led to a huge number of people with a VI ditching them entirely because they’re just not reliable any more.

There is an almost cult-like following of them in the VI community to the extent that anyone who has criticised them in the past has been shot down in flames for daring to suggest they’re anything other than the second coming.

There can and should be middle ground on all counts IMO.

To suggest that anyone who owns a pair of metta glasses is a nonse or a creep is vile. Plenty of people film with their phones all the time, to be able to take video and pictures is convenient if you do it with a pair of glasses, and they do serve a purpose purely as a pair of ray-bans, just because someone wears them doesn’t mean they’re filming with them, they may use them later and purely have them on at the gates because they’re sunglasses, for now.

ETA (because my screen lost the bloody focus and wouldn’t let me type more). Equally it can be acknowledged that there are people who benefit from them as something other than a media device but who need to accept that in some areas they just won’t be allowed. Such as Wetherspoons who have already banned them, or that it’s not e.g. ok to ask for descriptions of people around places like swimming pools or cassino’s etc.

FWIw I own a pair on the basis I was under the impression that certain apps would be made available on them and weren’t. I’ve worn them out purely as a pair of ray-bans because I do wear sunglasses and they were to hand,

But I’m actually looking to sell them as I never ever use them as a visual aid and could do with the cash frankly.

bruffin · 24/08/2026 18:56

PinkyFlamingo · 24/08/2026 18:42

So what makes you think some Dad's are using them at school then?

Op is making it up to stir, school has been out for weeks, so how she is seeing all these men with them at the school gate is weird.

LejlaKapovic · 24/08/2026 20:03

Minephotographercat · 24/08/2026 07:06

I know several Dads at our primary school own, and are big advocates of the meta glasses that can record people without them realising.

WIBU to email the school (without naming names) with my concerns that our children might be being recorded at the school gate?

Please do. It's a horrible invention, and I don't understand how can they be legal...

ThePeppyOpalScroller · 24/08/2026 20:14

Dotheygohigherthanfactor50 · 24/08/2026 09:42

It's not being naive. Meta are aware of the concerns and have updated the software so that if anyone tampers with the camera, pulsing light, shutter noise, it disables the product.

No they haven't. Again, there are forums dedicated to bypassing those features.

noctilucentcloud · 24/08/2026 20:20

bruffin · 24/08/2026 18:56

Op is making it up to stir, school has been out for weeks, so how she is seeing all these men with them at the school gate is weird.

Edited

Scottish schools are back.

allthiscarryon · 24/08/2026 20:23

Minephotographercat · 24/08/2026 07:06

I know several Dads at our primary school own, and are big advocates of the meta glasses that can record people without them realising.

WIBU to email the school (without naming names) with my concerns that our children might be being recorded at the school gate?

Report it, fucking creepy men. So unnecessary and only a loser wouldn’t realise why they would be making other parents and children feel unsafe

allthiscarryon · 24/08/2026 20:23

bruffin · 24/08/2026 18:56

Op is making it up to stir, school has been out for weeks, so how she is seeing all these men with them at the school gate is weird.

Edited

Lots of schools are back - not everyone goes to school in England FFS

ToffeePennie · 24/08/2026 20:26

See I’m sure it was in some training I was doing where a vulnerable child was on a school trip, despite training and everything given to all the staff and parents helping, the father still managed to find his daughter. It was because someone had MetaGlasses on and filmed themselves and their friend on the same trip. If I remember correctly, the father showed up at the school, there was a lot of chaos and mum had to move again.
I think purely for the safety of children they should be banned around schools/school children.

bruffin · 24/08/2026 20:27

allthiscarryon · 24/08/2026 20:23

Lots of schools are back - not everyone goes to school in England FFS

Still dont believe Op