Help protect children from gaming harms.

Take our survey

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think pensions need huge reform?

263 replies

aburrsir · 12/08/2026 13:32

With all of the recent chat over changing politicians and big ideas that don’t go anywhere, I can’t be the only one who thinks that someone needs to bite the bullet with pensions?

It’s something ridiculous like 50% of the welfare budget annually, and this is never going to go away.

IMO the government need to hike up retirement age and scrap the triple lock. There can be provisions made to go along with this to phase this in for those in genuine need (e.g. for the next 10 years those with no private pensions can get a top up to cover the transition period).

I’d rather know “look you can’t retire until 75” now than this constant “it’s 67…. now wait it’s 68…..” that never ends.

It seems that all governments are scared to do such a big change as it will piss off older people (who are the primary voting demographic) but something needs to change as this is just completely unsustainable long term.

We’re better off making these changes to ensure the state pension can continue sustainably in the long term future rather than having this attitude of “as long as I’m alright I don’t care”

We need a gov with long term planning goals and not just short term firefighting. AIBU?

OP posts:
ByQuaintAzureWasp · 12/08/2026 14:33

I paid into my state pension from 18 to 57. I paid £3k to top up to almost full state pension. Now they've not raised the tax thresholds Im dragged into paying g 40% tax ... so ive paid a hefty lump sum to pay more tax. Its bloody madness.

aburrsir · 12/08/2026 14:34

InWithPeaceOutWithStress · 12/08/2026 14:28

YABU to obsess over reducing public spending. The UK already spends a lot less per GDP on this than most other European countries. This race to the bottom in the U.K. is incredibly grim. Allow older people to retire and live in peace. Consider that billionaires wealth is spiralling and they’re paying zero tax. The rich are getting astronomically richer at our expense, quite literally.

I don’t disagree with you on principle but how would you actually enforce or police taxing wealth in this way?

OP posts:
rwalker · 12/08/2026 14:38

aburrsir · 12/08/2026 14:29

I don’t really see what you mean, what exactly is being taken off you?

I would be no better off be my larger private pension would mean I d get less state pension
son might as well have smaller private pension and get more state pension

also the flaw in your plan is in manual trade are they really going to be capable at 69. -70 to do the job

aburrsir · 12/08/2026 14:41

TheSmallAssassin · 12/08/2026 14:23

I think we need to get rid of the triple lock - it's done its job. I think it's fair for the state pension age to rise a bit, so people spend about the same proportion of time in retirement vs working as previous generations did, and taking account of life expectancy now.

To pull other levers, we could make sure that women don't get penalised for having children, men share the load and we subsidise childcare more, so that we encourage birth rates to go up. If we don't do that, we will need to encourage more immigration so we have more young tax payers to support pensioners.

We could also spend more on preventative health and encourage people to exercise more, eat more plants and wholefoods (like in Denmark) and drink less so that they stay healthier for longer.

I agree with all that you have said here. And fwiw I agree that the carrot is usually better than the stick - incentives to stay healthier are a good idea.

i think a lot of people don’t realise that people don’t want kids for lots of reasons nowadays and that we therefore need some level of immigration to combat this!

OP posts:
orangehandles · 12/08/2026 14:45

aburrsir · 12/08/2026 13:41

Yes this was my thinking. I agree it’s unfair to fling this onto current retirees etc, but long term we should be planning to resolve the issue

Climate change is by far the most important thing any government should be dealing with right now, otherwise the generations after ours won't even get to retirement age.

Digerydont · 12/08/2026 14:46

OP wants to take money from the those who have worked, so more can be given to those who don't work or don't work, much. Most who qualify for a state pension have worked full-time for 35 years or more and would consider that they have deserved something in return. OP would like to turn us into grateful beggars. Sounds like a leftist to me.

Digerydont · 12/08/2026 14:50

Frankly, I wouldn't begrudge Lord Sugar his state pension if he claimed it. He has presumably paid NI for more than 35 years, so like the rest of us deserves it.

Motheranddaughter · 12/08/2026 14:54

I am 61
When I was about 30 I reckoned there was a fair chance the state pension would not exist by the time I reached my 60s so made my pension arrangements on that basis
So now assume changes in the next 6 years it will be a bit of a bonus for me
I think the current system is sustainable but we would all have to pay more tax

Slightly irrigated at people saying people in their 60 s can’t woRk
i am working as hard as ever and have no plans to retire

BurntBroccoli · 12/08/2026 14:57

FeminaScribens · 12/08/2026 14:01

You don't see the ones who are poor because they don't go out so much and when they do they go to different places. You don't go in the library to keep warm in the winter.

No I sit with my coat on in the house as I can’t afford to have my oil heating on a lot. Also have arthritis.

There’s not just pensioners who are affected by high prices etc, but they get the majority of benefits as they go out and vote.

ownedbymydogs · 12/08/2026 15:02

aburrsir · 12/08/2026 14:34

I don’t disagree with you on principle but how would you actually enforce or police taxing wealth in this way?

How about Starbucks paying more than £0 corporation tax (£556 million in sales) to start with?

Also popping on to the third pensioner bashing thread today (nudge theory truly in action) to remind people that the state pension costs roughly the same amount as the interest this government pays on its loans.

You’re all shouting at the wrong people.

Digerydont · 12/08/2026 15:02

There are at least 3 pensioner bashing threads going. Why aren't you all at work?

ownedbymydogs · 12/08/2026 15:03

Digerydont · 12/08/2026 15:02

There are at least 3 pensioner bashing threads going. Why aren't you all at work?

Call me suspicious, but I think this is their work!

Bunnyofhope · 12/08/2026 15:05

aburrsir · 12/08/2026 13:32

With all of the recent chat over changing politicians and big ideas that don’t go anywhere, I can’t be the only one who thinks that someone needs to bite the bullet with pensions?

It’s something ridiculous like 50% of the welfare budget annually, and this is never going to go away.

IMO the government need to hike up retirement age and scrap the triple lock. There can be provisions made to go along with this to phase this in for those in genuine need (e.g. for the next 10 years those with no private pensions can get a top up to cover the transition period).

I’d rather know “look you can’t retire until 75” now than this constant “it’s 67…. now wait it’s 68…..” that never ends.

It seems that all governments are scared to do such a big change as it will piss off older people (who are the primary voting demographic) but something needs to change as this is just completely unsustainable long term.

We’re better off making these changes to ensure the state pension can continue sustainably in the long term future rather than having this attitude of “as long as I’m alright I don’t care”

We need a gov with long term planning goals and not just short term firefighting. AIBU?

Why would this piss off older people? They are already claiming their pensions. It will piss off younger people, who will have to wait till they are 75 surely?

Melograno · 12/08/2026 15:06

Naunet · 12/08/2026 14:20

Im sick to death of the government throwing tax payers money away. Billions wasted on HS2, millions wasted on the Rowanda plan, millions sent to other countries, (half of which either dont even need it, like China or arent providing the service we're paying for, like France), millions on supporting people who have never paid a penny into the system....Yet when we look to cut back, who do we look to first? Those who HAVE paid into the system all their lives. Its fucked up.

Amen to this!
Also there is a crisis looming for over 54 year olds who rent -Sky Money this morning
What do people think will happen if pensions are pushed back further but people cant work?
Sling them out on the streets?

I do have to laugh that its always huuuuge houses, huuuge cars, huuuge trolleys of food from M&S , Boomers , selfish pensioners Bingo time again !

ApplebyArrows · 12/08/2026 15:10

I know lots of older people who don't work for money but probably still could and to be honest it's largely beneficial to society. People who can use the time to look after their grandchildren, volunteer, spend money in cafes and museums ... Forcing up the retirement age might not actually be the best thing for society more widely.

loveawineloveacrisp · 12/08/2026 15:11

Passaggressfedup · 12/08/2026 13:55

Some people will, but some people will continue to work and thus continue to pay tax etc. The % who will claim sickness benefits etc is probably still worth making the change for the sake of the % who can carry on working
I'm sorry OP but I can only assume you are still quite young. People in their 60s are struggling to work. To pay valuable level of tax, most would have to work FT. Add the fact that as a nation, we are suffering with long term conditions at an earlier age, how do you expect the majority of people to be fit to work at 70?

And we are talking about a working age workforce that are more than ever claiming sickness benefits! If they are struggling to work for MH reasons at 30, do you really think they will be the people to work at 70?

What we need is working age people in work, preferably FT.

Couldn't have put it better myself.

Dollymylove · 12/08/2026 15:20

I wont be around but I would love to hear all the whingeing and moaning from those who complain about the pensioners getting .....errrr....an old pension,, realising that still having to work in your 70s is not a great life. Just remember you lot are the ones that want this 🤣🤣

Digerydont · 12/08/2026 15:23

People in their 60s are being forced to use up their savings as they can't find work. Imagine being 69 and having to go cap in hand to job centre plus for 400 quid a month and then having to jump through all their "job hunting" hoops. Maybe even have to join a back to work program because you lost your job at 64 and have spent all your savings, private pension, and can't get the state pension until 70.

Cucurella · 12/08/2026 15:23

Whilst undoubtedly pension reform is needed I’d like to see other benefits tackled first. Pensions are a contributory benefit that people have paid for all their working lives (I know not directly for their own pension) and are taxable. It’s right that people should receive support in later years.
Other things, like child maintenance not being taken into account for UC etc should be tackled first.

topcat2014 · 12/08/2026 15:26

What other benefits would a 66 year old homeowner get?

godmum56 · 12/08/2026 15:30

Melisand · 12/08/2026 14:16

Silly, ill-informed comment with a touch of ageism thrown in for good measure 🙄

yup. and a hint of "take the money off them not me"

milkhater · 12/08/2026 15:36

Cucurella · 12/08/2026 15:23

Whilst undoubtedly pension reform is needed I’d like to see other benefits tackled first. Pensions are a contributory benefit that people have paid for all their working lives (I know not directly for their own pension) and are taxable. It’s right that people should receive support in later years.
Other things, like child maintenance not being taken into account for UC etc should be tackled first.

The vast majority haven’t paid enough tax for their pension which matters when the demographics shift

CeramicRoses · 12/08/2026 15:37

KaleidoscopeSmile · 12/08/2026 14:05

It doesn't sound "harsh", it sounds like obnoxious, ageist bullshit.

And are you fuck seeing pensioners "living the high life". You mean they're not in penury as you apparently think they deserve going by your next statement "I don't know a single one who can't afford to eat". Is that how you think they should be living?

Edited

Agree. Particularly ‘enjoying’ the anxiety about making sure state pension age is uncoupled from their big fat private pension being released. God forbid they should have to work till they drop. Just happy to see those who have scraped by in poverty, therefore with no private pension, breaking their bones doing cleaning work or factory work at 75. The lack of empathy is horrifying. ‘Living the high life.’ FFS.

MidnightMeltdown · 12/08/2026 15:40

YABU. Most employers don’t want people in their 60s, let alone 70s, and there are loads of jobs people won’t be capable of doing at that age. Who is going to employ all these older people?

loveawineloveacrisp · 12/08/2026 15:42

5128gap · 12/08/2026 14:30

Its possible that fit and healthy people with office or WFH jobs could be working at 75. Less likely for manual workers with heavy physical jobs. Like it not, for most of us, the body weakens and health declines.

Cool. So office workers have to work til they die? You do realise that not all office jobs are a doddle and require a lot of mental dexterity?

I'm 57 and constantly tired. Very high pressure financial services job. I'm done with it.

Swipe left for the next trending thread