Help end medical misogyny. Sign our petition.

Help end medical misogyny.
Sign our petition.

Sign the petition

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think the menopause makes no sense evolutionarily speaking

116 replies

CurdinHenry · Yesterday 22:15

Sure maybe it makes sense that women evolve into a new phase of wisdom and a role that's different from child having and of that. But how come we all seem to run out of the basic chemicals needed to keep our pelvic floor from collapsing? How can we be evolved to be almost certain to get very unwell across time (in our longer years on this planet) if we don't take supplements that have only existed for less than 100 years????

Feel a bit stressed about it.

OP posts:
Firegoddess · Today 07:03

Francestein · Today 06:46

Menopause is physically the beginning of the end. Once upon a time we would have been lucky to reach menopause, and the few women that did certainly wouldn’t have had another half a lifetime ahead of them like we do. Once you’re no longer popping eggs out, your oestrogen levels drop dramatically - like a castrated man’s testosterone levels would. Once that happens, our bones and cardiovascular systems are affected as well as cell turnover. We heal much more slowly and we are more vulnerable to infection and autoimmune diseases: It’s not evolution, it’s nature’s way of pulling the plug.

This is full of falsehoods. A great deal of women who reached adulthood reached menopause, and a great deal of them would have had about half a lifetime still to live.

Men’s bodies also start to deteriorate and they heal more slowly and injure more easily. This starts from their thirties ( active men will notice it most quickly). They can also start to piss themselves due to prostrate issues btw. It’s not a female only issue. It’s just part of ageing. The first rapid decline begins mid forties for men and women.

Raising human children is very labour intensive and lasts for a very extended period of time compared to other mammals. This may be why there is an advantage to menopause. It enables females who don’t have dependents of their own, to help raise the dependents of their offspring. It also means your will have raised your own children to sexual maturity ( and therefore independence and able to form their own family) by the time you are about 60 ( if you are infertile by 45 as most women effectively are and puberty is 15). So you don’t have dependent young of your own into old age.

Pedant61 · Today 07:08

Well many/most of us don't "need" medication, and do perfectly well without it - including in the 21st century.
But, yes, once babies are born (in our late teens/early 20s), our job is done and our children are raised by our 40s so, biologically, there's no point to us after that.
In modern society, childbirth is greatly delayed, so mothers of very small children may be reaching menopause at what seems like the "wrong" stage in life. But that is about culture and society, not biology.

Meadowfinch · Today 07:14

Op, the human body wasn't designed for the life we lead now, sitting at a desk all day, driving around in cars, eating processed rubbish and drinking alcohol.

Those women who didn't die in childbirth would have still been hunting/farming, keeping up with the rest of the tribe until they were physically unable. They would have taken a supportive role.

I had ds at 45, yet don't have any of those symptoms.

I'm 63, cook from scratch, eat 30 different fruit & veg a week, seldom drink, run at least 20k a week, cycle, practice martial arts, do a lot of veggie gardening.

My menopause was a couple of night sweats in my 50s. My pelvic floor is the same as it has always been, my bone density is normal, plenty of energy, everything else is normal.

I think as you get older, you have to go back to basics and support your health by keeping it simple. Which some might think is a bit boring but it is better than feeling ill.

Pedant61 · Today 07:16

Remaker · Today 04:51

I’m 4 years past menopause and if I’m very unwell from it nobody has mentioned it. I don’t take HRT, my bladder is fine, my moods are fine.

I 100% agree. As I regularly say, we are all different. Some women do struggle, yes, but this trend to medicalise a normal stage of life is very unhelpful and misleading.

Dolphinnoises · Today 07:18

I think the pelvic floor is a by-product. I think we’re evolved to go off sex as soon as it’s no longer likely to be productive, to encourage our male partners to find another partner. It’s why our nurturing hormones also vanish. Grim but logical.

Sugarnspicenallthingsnaice · Today 07:19

Pedant61 · Today 07:16

I 100% agree. As I regularly say, we are all different. Some women do struggle, yes, but this trend to medicalise a normal stage of life is very unhelpful and misleading.

I can't speak for all women of course but I think for many, the awful symptoms are actually in perimenopause and they go back to feeling human once periods have stopped.

Soontobe60 · Today 07:19

NullaEffugium · Yesterday 22:24

Menopause makes complete sense evolutionarily speaking.
There is no point having a geriatric body try and grow and birth a baby. You’d not live long enough to raise the baby even if you survived the pregnancy and childbirth. I’m super happy being post menopausal. I feel better and healthier.

The prolapse, incontinence and so on is usually caused by modern medical interventions that hurry birth along. Episotomy, pitocin, breaking the waters, forceps, ventouse these all cause severe internal damage and large, deep tears. Even the cervical exams to check dilation damage us internally. It’s not caused by a lack of chemicals.

And yet women survive childbirth at far higher rates than they did even 100 years ago, along with a significant reduction in infant mortality. I wonder why?

Soontobe60 · Today 07:22

NullaEffugium · Yesterday 22:25

That’s not true. We aren’t giant squid.
We are meant to be around to teach our children how to parent.
That’s how we are such a successful species.

And if we had our children at the age our bodies tell us we can, ie post puberty, we would be parents at 16, grandparents at 32 and if we were lucky great grandparents at 48.

CinnamonJellyBeans · Today 07:26

AllJoyAndNoFun · Today 06:12

But we would have been grandmothers at 30 ish because we'd be having babies at 14/15/16 (basically as soon as we were fertile). By the time we were menopausal it's possible we'd already be great grandmothers and possibly also still mothers of dependent children at the same time. Having middle aged women in the community unburdened by their own young children probably did (does?) have some benefits but I think it's been overplayed in this relatively new attempt to reframe menopause as this positive new life phase.

But from an evolutionary perspective it doesn't really come into play, unless it's a case of early or late menopause conferring an advantage in terms of multi-generational child rearing and that tendency being hereditary, but I'm not sure that's the case.

It really is the case that the multi-generational child rearing is why we are still alive. We've been selected for the genes that confer longevity in order to assist with child-rearing, therefore allowing more frequent reproduction of our own female offspring.

ConfusedSoShutUp · Today 07:32

Indianajet · Yesterday 22:23

My pelvic floor is fine - I had 5 children, did the exercises and fingers crossed still fine in my 70s.

Would you like to add a teeny but more smugness to your post....I don't think we all quite caught it..?

LasagneGoblin · Today 07:34

MrsPapillon · Yesterday 22:32

Well if we didn’t turn into fat, sweaty swamp monsters with leaky bladders and a hairy top lip, men would still attempt their rutting with us and it would be a waste of time. They need to save their precious seed for the young fertile members of the female species. It’s like a big sign over our heads saying “Fuck off Phil, I’m done with all that!”

Nailed it.

EdithStourton · Today 07:45

NullaEffugium · Yesterday 22:27

No no no. You are not understanding how life expectancy tables work.
Even two hundred years ago, if you lived to adulthood, your life expectancy was still the mid60s.
The average life expectancy was artificially suppressed by the high rate of infant and child mortality.

Edited

I was about to say something very similar!

DontrockthecaravanGeoffrey · Today 07:48

Until relatively recent times people lead brutally hard physical lives, much more dependent on the seasons and exposed to the elements. Everything would have been hard physical work. Peoples' teeth were worn down from eating hard grains and prone to untreated abscesses, decay and infection- what people could eat would have been restricted and their diets poor and even more so in the leaner months and years. Old bones now tell tales of infection, disease, badly repaired breaks.

People would have been worn out and in decline by 40 and childbirth, already very risky in those times would have become progressively more dangerous for older, worn out bodies.

The life expectancy points above are true, but a 40 year old in 1500 was a very different thing from a 40 year old in our world sofas, washing machines, freezers, ready meals and central heating.

Dollymylove · Today 07:49

Indianajet · Yesterday 22:23

My pelvic floor is fine - I had 5 children, did the exercises and fingers crossed still fine in my 70s.

Same here. 65, 5 natural births. Pelvic floor of cast iron xx

CaptainMyCaptain · Today 07:50

Indianajet · Yesterday 22:23

My pelvic floor is fine - I had 5 children, did the exercises and fingers crossed still fine in my 70s.

Same. Only one child though but it isn't inevitable.

mulberrymilk · Today 07:51

ConfusedSoShutUp · Today 07:32

Would you like to add a teeny but more smugness to your post....I don't think we all quite caught it..?

There's nothing smug about reporting a well-functioning pelvic floor.

It certainly beats the "we're all doomed to shrivel up, crumble, and die" mantra.

Mischance · Today 07:52

Menopause only exists because we now live so long. I suspect that our original design assumes we will be dead before then!

MrsShawnHatosy · Today 07:53

Dolphinnoises · Today 07:18

I think the pelvic floor is a by-product. I think we’re evolved to go off sex as soon as it’s no longer likely to be productive, to encourage our male partners to find another partner. It’s why our nurturing hormones also vanish. Grim but logical.

I’m 15 years past menopause and still interested in sex. I’m childless though,and I have heard that some women go off sex once they feel their family is complete.

Ooih · Today 07:53

CurdinHenry · Yesterday 22:20

I don't agree. Humans are community based creatures and that's the seat of our survival. I guess evolution can't select for people who maintain a good pelvic floor post menopause because it happens post selection but it's still weird to me.

It selects for children who outperform other children. If a grandmother who can hold their urine gets better survival outcome for subsequent generations it might be selected for, but i bet there are more significant trains. You would also need people in the gene pool who didn't suffer with menopause. Also I suspect a horrible menopause is associated with desirable traits

Sherararara · Today 07:55

CurdinHenry · Yesterday 22:20

I don't agree. Humans are community based creatures and that's the seat of our survival. I guess evolution can't select for people who maintain a good pelvic floor post menopause because it happens post selection but it's still weird to me.

Well that’s your problem then. Youre trying to shoehorn a narrative that is untrue on basic biology. Menopause is nature drawing a line under your ability to have kids when you’re too old and knackered to do so healthily. Thats it.

backformoreofthesame · Today 07:55

A lot of menopause problems are exacerbated by lifestyle factors

not widely published - probably because once you get there it’s too late and it is standard health advice - are much more likely to have an easy symptom free menopause if you are a healthy weight

and you are much more likely to be problem free if you don’t eat white carbs - if your diet is wholemeal, heavy on the fibre

you are much less likely o suffer from bone problems if you have had a life of hard physical work

modern life makes menopause much worse it seems

lucya66 · Today 07:58

It’s evolution allowing us to survive past reproduction so we can pass on our knowledge. Orcas do it too and they’re one of the most intelligent species.

zurigo · Today 08:02

The menopause makes perfect evolutionary sense. Women are born with all the eggs they will ever have and those eggs have a shelf life - they don't stay fresh and healthy forever. Pregnancy and childbirth are also very physically demanding and until the advent of modern medicine (and even now sometimes) they were extremely dangerous. It benefits the family and wider society if some older women survive and hang around to cook dinner, tend a garden, help with the children, etc.

Wofflewaffle · Today 08:03

evolution doesn’t really care if our pelvic floor collapses 🤷‍♀️ by the time that happens, we’ve served our purpose. Biologically, we should start having babies around 14/15/16, so by the time we hit menopause (if we survive that long), we’ve had a pretty good kick at the childbearing ball. And that’s all evolution cares about I’m afraid.

Francestein · Today 08:12

@Firegoddess - please tell me what falsehoods you detected in my very simple, non-medical summary. Describing what happens to men is an irrelevant diversion. Yes their bodies go to shit too, but in very different ways and for different reasons.

Swipe left for the next trending thread