Help end medical misogyny. Sign our petition.

Help end medical misogyny.
Sign our petition.

Sign the petition

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

to think this couple in the guardian are strange and this was not an appropriate subject for a book?

182 replies

HildegardVonBingham · Yesterday 06:53

My jaw was on the floor as I read this. Obviously it’s awful that they were subjected to a campaign of harassment, absolutely no excuses. But I do think it’s insensitive to write a whole BOOK about it, given that the perpetrators killed themselves in a double suicide?! I also don’t know who just lends a neighbour £10k!!! Whole piece compounds my suspicion of everyone who chooses to live in the arse end of nowhere…. www.theguardian.com/world/2026/jul/05/dream-home-turned-nightmare-in-wales-stalker-neighbours-stalked-book

OP posts:
Member968405 · Yesterday 08:22

Victoriawould24 · Yesterday 07:20

I found it a very odd read, the way it was written was awful so many over the top flourishes and descriptions it really jarred with me.
It also made no sense, that the neighbour told the husband he was like a dad to him for example, it was never really conveyed that they ever liked them.

The big drama when ‘Cassie’ started the war by taking a friend over their river land felt like a non event.
It almost read like AI and I couldn’t decide if it was just terribly written or I didn’t like the people or their story.

It was very much giving The Salt Path vibes to me , trying to stir the hearts and book buying wallets of naive middle class readers shook that one of their own just trying their best had faced such misfortune.
It’ll probably be a tv drama before we know it.

I would be very interested to read an objective account that explains the other couple’s actions, motivations and demise.

There WAS something weird about the writing, now you mention it. Maybe we can instinctively sniff out something AI-written.

The Salt Path is also an interesting point of reference. Any ‘poor me’ memoir is probably erasing something about the protagonist.

Somersetlady · Yesterday 08:22

TemperanceWest · Yesterday 08:10

It was very much giving The Salt Path vibes to me

I had the same thought. Lending huge amounts of money to strangers seemed very odd. Maybe the book explains in more depth.

I think, if you read the article, they learned the money because it allows them to go on the paperworkers having a title claim on the land if the money was never paid back…..

This was land they wanted to buy at a future date, but we’re not in a position to purchase immediately.

Clafoutie · Yesterday 08:22

The writing does seem odd and it does make you wonder whether it is AI assisted. Since when does a police officer arrive at your house and say “ at your service”? So many other overblown flourishes like this.

User97463 · Yesterday 08:24

Somersetlady · Yesterday 08:22

I think, if you read the article, they learned the money because it allows them to go on the paperworkers having a title claim on the land if the money was never paid back…..

This was land they wanted to buy at a future date, but we’re not in a position to purchase immediately.

So they actually didn't have to AI a book to get their 25K back!

professionalcommentreader · Yesterday 08:26

HildegardVonBingham · Yesterday 07:58

Thank you @Victoriawould24 I completely agree!!! DP read it and kept rolling eyes and going ‘off to buy ANOTHER vehicle!!!’ Obviously the deceased were nutters who unjustly terrorised them. However I don’t think I could in good conscience pose outside my farmhouse in my best toast casuals looking harrowed and world-weary for the guardian photographer knowing that Cassie’s bereaved mother would likely read it! A woman who remains with such a violent man is not of sound mind, and I really feel for her parents.

It’s not about you.

LizzieSiddal · Yesterday 08:26

HildegardVonBingham · Yesterday 07:58

Thank you @Victoriawould24 I completely agree!!! DP read it and kept rolling eyes and going ‘off to buy ANOTHER vehicle!!!’ Obviously the deceased were nutters who unjustly terrorised them. However I don’t think I could in good conscience pose outside my farmhouse in my best toast casuals looking harrowed and world-weary for the guardian photographer knowing that Cassie’s bereaved mother would likely read it! A woman who remains with such a violent man is not of sound mind, and I really feel for her parents.

Your take on all of this is really odd!!

Put yourselves in their position and what happened to them. They must have been absolutely traumatised and terrified. If they wish to let the world know what they went through they have every right to do that.

And why should they think about Cassie’s mother? She isn’t their problem and you’re getting very close to victim blaming.

Applesdoremusings97 · Yesterday 08:27

Victoriawould24 · Yesterday 07:20

I found it a very odd read, the way it was written was awful so many over the top flourishes and descriptions it really jarred with me.
It also made no sense, that the neighbour told the husband he was like a dad to him for example, it was never really conveyed that they ever liked them.

The big drama when ‘Cassie’ started the war by taking a friend over their river land felt like a non event.
It almost read like AI and I couldn’t decide if it was just terribly written or I didn’t like the people or their story.

It was very much giving The Salt Path vibes to me , trying to stir the hearts and book buying wallets of naive middle class readers shook that one of their own just trying their best had faced such misfortune.
It’ll probably be a tv drama before we know it.

I would be very interested to read an objective account that explains the other couple’s actions, motivations and demise.

What?

I would have thought petrol bombs and cross bow attacks did warrant an over the top response tbh!

I haven’t read the book and the article seems to leave a lot out about the money but honestly I don’t blame them for writing about it!

And why is there something inherently wrong with living in the arse end of nowhere Op? We are not all the same thanks very much! I would hate to live in a busy city or town.

Beachtastic · Yesterday 08:28

Fuck them. I have sympathy for people with MH issues, but not dangerous lunatics.

HaudYerWheeshtYaWeeBellend · Yesterday 08:29

I honestly don’t know why you’d expect these people to be sensitive to the memory of dead people who petrol‑bombed them, cut off their water supply, shot at their windows with crossbows and subjected them to a campaign of harassment and intimidation.

That’s not a “normal disagreement” — that’s sustained, deliberate violence.

When you’ve lived through something like that, you don’t owe the perpetrators reverence, softness, or silence. You owe yourself whatever helps you survive it.

Writing about it isn’t “weird”; it’s a trauma response. It’s a way of reclaiming control, documenting what happened, and refusing to let the people who terrorised them also dictate how they heal.

It’s not for you to decide how they deal with their trauma. Calling their coping mechanism strange while downplaying the severity of what they endured is the part that’s actually odd.

Imdunfer · Yesterday 08:30

User97463 · Yesterday 08:24

So they actually didn't have to AI a book to get their 25K back!

You haven't read it properly, the promised paperwork was never put through so they have no claim on the land.

Godrabbit · Yesterday 08:31

The two bits that stood out as ridiculous and guaranteed I won't buy it...

'At your service' bahahahaha right okay
The comment about the 999 operator knowing who she was before she said her name! Give over 🙄

User97463 · Yesterday 08:34

Imdunfer · Yesterday 08:30

You haven't read it properly, the promised paperwork was never put through so they have no claim on the land.

This article states that the land dispute was settled in civil court!
https://www.devonlive.com/news/devon-news/former-soldier-starts-life-again-5218447

The Collinses apparently moved to Devon in 2019-2020 after the trial. Francis also spent over 400 days in jail while Cassie moved back with her family. All those timeline gaps are not mentioned in The Guardian and it's given the impression that they terrorised them as neighbours up until their suicide.

Most of the newspaper articles mention a new police investigation (not the one for firebombing) as one of the catalysts for the couple's suicide. Combined with financial problems and health problems, especially in Cassie's case. Her sister mentioned she treated her dogs like children because was in too much pain to have real children.

Former soldier moves to Devon after fire bombing neighbour's house

When police searched the fire-starter's house they found the former Paratrooper had US Army guidebooks on how to make improvised incendiary devices

https://www.devonlive.com/news/devon-news/former-soldier-starts-life-again-5218447

LooksLikeIPickedTheWrongWeekToQuitDrinking · Yesterday 08:35

They have every right to tell their story, whether for catharsis or money, and owe their terrorising, murderous former neighbours absolutely nothing.

And as for “Whole piece compounds my suspicion of everyone who chooses to live in the arse end of nowhere” yes, you’re absolutely right: bad things never happen in towns and suburbs 🙄

LizzieSiddal · Yesterday 08:35

Godrabbit · Yesterday 08:31

The two bits that stood out as ridiculous and guaranteed I won't buy it...

'At your service' bahahahaha right okay
The comment about the 999 operator knowing who she was before she said her name! Give over 🙄

Because of the harassment they most probably had a flag on their phone number. The call answer would have known exactly who she was before she spoke.

MyThreeWords · Yesterday 08:35

I didn't think it was an inappropriate subject for a book, but my god it was badly written. I skimread the whole article/excerpt because I wanted to learn what the actual events were, but it was painful having to wade past all the would-be writerly 'atmospheric' prose.

If you are fortunate enough to have such a compelling story to sell, then be honest enough to accept that it is the story, not your amateur artistry, that people are buying.

Enterthewolves · Yesterday 08:35

Godrabbit · Yesterday 08:31

The two bits that stood out as ridiculous and guaranteed I won't buy it...

'At your service' bahahahaha right okay
The comment about the 999 operator knowing who she was before she said her name! Give over 🙄

Actually that’s totally plausible - your number comes up and markers on previous calls

wishingonastar101 · Yesterday 08:35

Sweetbeansandmochi · Yesterday 07:08

Well they write well for a start, so I can see why they would want to apply those skills.

Sometimes the only way to deal with trauma is to transform it through a creative act. So, I don’t think it’s weird.

It was too long for a teaser in the guardian because I don’t need to read the book now.

Everything in the Guardian is too long these days! I worried it was my attention span but nope... every article is twice as long as it needs to be.

friskybivalves · Yesterday 08:36

I also googled and found this version (then later realised it was in the DM so ok shoot me too with ball bearings ). It’s only ‘Part One’ of the guardian excerpt - doesn’t have full denouement - but is less overblown in the writing style and - I felt - fills in more of the blanks of the early story. So perhaps whoever adapted it for the Guardian tried to cover too much ground and left out useful details while leaving in slop.

about:blank source:%20PressReader
https://share.google/fdSVYHIC2X0YNhHXs

Imdunfer · Yesterday 08:38

User97463 · Yesterday 08:34

This article states that the land dispute was settled in civil court!
https://www.devonlive.com/news/devon-news/former-soldier-starts-life-again-5218447

The Collinses apparently moved to Devon in 2019-2020 after the trial. Francis also spent over 400 days in jail while Cassie moved back with her family. All those timeline gaps are not mentioned in The Guardian and it's given the impression that they terrorised them as neighbours up until their suicide.

Most of the newspaper articles mention a new police investigation (not the one for firebombing) as one of the catalysts for the couple's suicide. Combined with financial problems and health problems, especially in Cassie's case. Her sister mentioned she treated her dogs like children because was in too much pain to have real children.

Edited

There was a case ruled in his favour. That doesn't automatically mean he got his money back or the costs of taking that case paid. It seems unlikely he ever paid a penny, given what happened.

Tootingbec · Yesterday 08:42

I remember the “double suicide” story at the time and still wonder about the “devoted couple” narrative that emerged from that tragedy. It sounds like Cassie was deeply entangled with a psychologically very dangerous man which ultimately lead to her death. After reading the Guardian piece I went back over to news reports of their deaths and the reporting is so odd - almost saying “how awful that the impact of Francis being found guilty of violence and intimidation has lead to them killing themselves” - like they were somehow hounded to their deaths by the “cruelty” of the justice system…..

And I too was baffled about the older couple giving Francis and Cassie £25k!! But maybe the abridged version has lost some important details of how that happened….

YerMasYerDa · Yesterday 08:43

I don’t understand why you think the couple has done anything wrong in writing a book about something that happened to THEM. It sounds as though they endured an extremely stressful and terrifying ordeal at the hands of this couple. Lots of people write books about significant events that have happened in their lives. There is no moral bar to this simply because the couple who harassed them have died.

That aside, the writing is truly awful. Flowery and drawn out and jarring. Reading the article, I felt sorry for the writers, but not as sorry as I might have if their story had been better presented. I wouldn’t be rushing out to buy the book.

Somersetlady · Yesterday 08:46

User97463 · Yesterday 08:24

So they actually didn't have to AI a book to get their 25K back!

They probably did. Unless this was actually registered on the lands title which it says in the book they never got and if it wasn’t official, then they wouldn’t have got it through probate.

it was the deal they thought they were getting and then the money have a title claim.

I only read the Guardian article and strangely this psychotic Stalker who killed themselves didn’t stick to their word about the land registry title and the money…..

ForeverDelayedEpiphany · Yesterday 08:46

Sweetbeansandmochi · Yesterday 07:08

Well they write well for a start, so I can see why they would want to apply those skills.

Sometimes the only way to deal with trauma is to transform it through a creative act. So, I don’t think it’s weird.

It was too long for a teaser in the guardian because I don’t need to read the book now.

This, absolutely. I've had some horrible traumatic things happen to my health and often wanted to write a book about it, almost as a kind of cathartic act. I think it is something that cleanses the soul as a kind of relief maybe 🤔

peakyblenders · Yesterday 08:50

'Suspicion of everyone who chooses to live in the arse end of nowhere' Everyone?

Are you normally this prejudiced against people who choose to buck convention, OP?

PopPopPoppies · Yesterday 08:50

I assume the couple were approached by the publishers at the time of the court case. There were several newspaper articles then. Perhaps the publishers provided a ghost writer, and also used ai.

My (deceased) parents moved to West Wales many years ago, and they had plenty of strange neighbours who had moved to the middle of nowhere to escape from something.