Help end medical misogyny. Sign our petition.

Help end medical misogyny.
Sign our petition.

Sign the petition

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

AIBU to feel helpless about a large asylum camp in our village?

1001 replies

putupwhatever · 29/06/2026 16:15

My village has been chosen for a 1500 open asylum camp for single men. It will be an open camp (as the men haven't done anything wrong so aren't detained.)

The thing is the village only has 700 people and it is pretty isolated. it's about 10 miles to the nearest city and you can walk to another small village. There is a playpark, a pub and a primary school.

It has to go through planning, but the government have changed the planning laws so that they grant themselves planning and you can't see it as it is deemed sensitive. So they will just grant themselves planning and you can't oppose it without a judicial review--by which time it will probably be already open.

They want to reduce the number of people in hotels. But am AIBU to think that this puts the burden of sorting these issues out on one tiny community? Feels like we are collateral damage to be honest. The community will be outnumbered 2 to 1 and it feels too much. There is nothing for them to do or places to go. Also the fact that it is all single men put in one massive place with no money or means or anything to do is going to lead to problems

Apparently the camps cost £10 less a night than the hotels. But they don't count the set up costs which are astronomical (the one in Essex was £47 million to set up). So it seems like it's not not even cheaper than the problem it is trying to solve but much more expensive.

AIBU to feel a bit helpless? It seems so unfair but there is nothing I can do. We wouldn't be able to move from the village anyway as no one would buy a house here.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
12
WhatAMarvelousTune · 29/06/2026 17:07

ilovebrie8 · 29/06/2026 17:01

Rwanda was the best option, following Australia’s lead.

Flown offshore until assessed.

But Starmer then dropped that idea.

I feel for you OP that is worrying the sheer numbers.

Edited

Just to be picky, the Rwanda plan wasn’t “flown offshore until assessed”. They’d have stayed there even if deemed a genuine asylum seeker with a successful claim. Which was part of the argument against it. They’d probably have had more luck getting it through if they said genuine asylum seekers would come back.

Littlebitpsycho · 29/06/2026 17:07

BillieWiper · 29/06/2026 17:00

I don't see why they need to bundle hundreds of them all together in encampments..as you say they've done nothing wrong.

So why not distribute them more evenly so they're in HMOs or something so it doesn't make people like you feel as if the whole community will be dominated by them.

We have a migrant hotel round the corner and I've never noticed any issues or even really any difference. Other than you used to get busses of Germans and Americans pulling up there. But that's because we're in the middle of a massive city.

I think a lot of them work as food couriers. And we do use them so if anything it could be seen as being more convenient.

It's also kind of cruel to both you and them to have them so far away from a town or city as inevitably they'll be bored and just lingering round the village.

Not that they shouldn't if they live there, but if they're bored they might be more likely to cause ASB or just be a bit disruptive. Same as young men from any culture with no money and nothing to do.

@BillieWiper haven't done anything wrong? Apart from enter the country illegally you mean

Onmytod24 · 29/06/2026 17:09

You’re panicking - wait and see

Tauranga · 29/06/2026 17:09

Lavender14 · 29/06/2026 16:24

"The community will be outnumbered 2 to 1 "

This is a really unhelpful way to look at it and it kind of speaks to an 'us and them' mentality op. That part I would say really isn't a fair thing and is your exposure to stereotypes speaking. I've worked extensively with single asylum seeking males and ALL of them bar none have been nothing but respectful individuals who were really keen to learn English, learn our culture, build a home and a life for themselves so they could get female or elderly relatives to safety. Most of them were strongly opposed to any sort of extremism which is what they were often running from. I have never ever felt unsafe working with them in the way I have with some local men.

Aside from that I think you are right to be concerned about the impact on community infrastructure which is a totally separate issue. I'd be asking council for their plans around access to healthcare and services that promote health, wellbeing and inclusion.

What I would also say is that for a small village this will likely bring a lot of money to your local shops, volunteers for local charity groups and probably new visitors to your local churches. So your community, if they approach this right, will have the benefit of people with free time and skills/ abilities to lend which is
in real decline in the current climate.

"All of them bar none are respectful"
And the band played believe it if you like.

It is us and them.
They are foreign men from very different cultures to ours.

EmeraldShamrock000 · 29/06/2026 17:09

MyKindHiker · 29/06/2026 17:06

And that's ultimately the goal isn't it. If they spent more on processing they would save so much in the cost of feeding and watering people whilst they wait years.

They have to the right to appeal, involve human rights solicitors, the home office, they have professionals helping them with their story, 10 years pass, thousands of pounds and the claim finally accepted. It’s bonkers.

suburburban · 29/06/2026 17:10

This whole thing needs to be stopped, we can’t go on with these migrants constantly arriving, it’s unsustainable, wish the Rwanda scheme had been kept in place

Yanbu OP

CaptainMyCaptain · 29/06/2026 17:10

MyKindHiker · 29/06/2026 17:03

Do you really believe that? That the government is shipping in illegal immigrants to mess with us? And if so, is it just Labour or was it the tories too? And if it's all governments... what do they have to gain from this cross-party conspiracy?

I agree its a ridiculous conspiracy theory.

Onmytod24 · 29/06/2026 17:11

Tauranga · 29/06/2026 17:09

"All of them bar none are respectful"
And the band played believe it if you like.

It is us and them.
They are foreign men from very different cultures to ours.

so everyone British has the same culture?included all the murderers and rapists in in our prisons?they’ve all got the same culture of you its absolute rubbish.

LaliqueSaltGrinder · 29/06/2026 17:11

MyKindHiker · 29/06/2026 16:51

I am absolutely anti racist and pro refugee rights, but it does seem to be basic common sense asylum seekers should be housed in areas they can integrate with the local communities. ie: London or nearby where they will also be able to access resources, meet people from their home country and generally live a life and contribute through volunteering etc whilst awaiting their claims to be processed.

I think the process needs to be speeded up considerably. Six months is the target and that is too long. Should be something like 8 weeks. For those 8 weeks, you are detained. You are not expected to "integrate" with anything as you are in limbo as it hasn't been established whether you have a right to be in the UK at all. If your case is approved, then off you go to start integrating. If your case is denied, you have a week to appeal before being deported, during which time you stay in detention.

LocalHobo · 29/06/2026 17:11

The flag wavers just wanted them out of thier area, and did not care where they went to next.
Not in my experience. A similar solution to Australia which flies and ships undocumented migrants and asylum seekers who arrive by boat to remote islands for detention and processing is extremely popular.

smallglassbottle · 29/06/2026 17:12

MyKindHiker · 29/06/2026 17:03

Do you really believe that? That the government is shipping in illegal immigrants to mess with us? And if so, is it just Labour or was it the tories too? And if it's all governments... what do they have to gain from this cross-party conspiracy?

I couldn't possibly imagine 🙄 I'm merely describing suspicious activity.

Notmycircusnotmyotter · 29/06/2026 17:13

That sounds horrific OP. It's insane that we're letting these men stay.

putupwhatever · 29/06/2026 17:14

LaliqueSaltGrinder · 29/06/2026 17:11

I think the process needs to be speeded up considerably. Six months is the target and that is too long. Should be something like 8 weeks. For those 8 weeks, you are detained. You are not expected to "integrate" with anything as you are in limbo as it hasn't been established whether you have a right to be in the UK at all. If your case is approved, then off you go to start integrating. If your case is denied, you have a week to appeal before being deported, during which time you stay in detention.

This seems sensible to me. Sorted quickly and then people can start with their new lives as part of the community if they become refugees. If the claims are processed quickly people probably wouldn't mind being detained for a month or six weeks knowing that it was going to be sorted soon and they were fed and watered. I think some are years at the moment and it's good for no one. Also then those whose claims are denied can't just disappear

OP posts:
LuckyHazelFox · 29/06/2026 17:14

Lavender14 · 29/06/2026 16:24

"The community will be outnumbered 2 to 1 "

This is a really unhelpful way to look at it and it kind of speaks to an 'us and them' mentality op. That part I would say really isn't a fair thing and is your exposure to stereotypes speaking. I've worked extensively with single asylum seeking males and ALL of them bar none have been nothing but respectful individuals who were really keen to learn English, learn our culture, build a home and a life for themselves so they could get female or elderly relatives to safety. Most of them were strongly opposed to any sort of extremism which is what they were often running from. I have never ever felt unsafe working with them in the way I have with some local men.

Aside from that I think you are right to be concerned about the impact on community infrastructure which is a totally separate issue. I'd be asking council for their plans around access to healthcare and services that promote health, wellbeing and inclusion.

What I would also say is that for a small village this will likely bring a lot of money to your local shops, volunteers for local charity groups and probably new visitors to your local churches. So your community, if they approach this right, will have the benefit of people with free time and skills/ abilities to lend which is
in real decline in the current climate.

Totally out of touch. Funny how it's always people who supposedly have worked with asylum seekers or live next door to asylum hotels that all say the same. It is far from a rosy situation and the OP has every reason to be worried.

Tauranga · 29/06/2026 17:14

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

RetiredFromExplaining · 29/06/2026 17:14

So what did the men in the RAF do when they weren’t working? Did they go to the pub? Roam around the village? Military men can be pretty misogynistic and have bad attitudes towards women.

MrsDroughtFire · 29/06/2026 17:15

@LumpyandBumps you definitely can draw a very sharp distinction between a barracks of British soldiers, and a transient population of unidentified, unknown, untested single men who by definition have been traumatised (otherwise they shouldn’t be seeking asylum) and have not been brought up to respect British values and culture.

I certainly would challenge the population of my town being increased by 200% with men like this.

I feel incredibly sorry for you OP and I agree it’s outrageous the government can do this without consultation

CaptainMyCaptain · 29/06/2026 17:15

LuckyHazelFox · 29/06/2026 17:14

Totally out of touch. Funny how it's always people who supposedly have worked with asylum seekers or live next door to asylum hotels that all say the same. It is far from a rosy situation and the OP has every reason to be worried.

Possibly they're the people either actual relevant experience.

Tauranga · 29/06/2026 17:17

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Allseeingallknowing · 29/06/2026 17:17

Doesn’t the Home Secretary realise that it’s not about hotels and camps, it’s about the fact that people coming over in boats shouldn't be here at all. Stopping the boats should be her priority. That’s what the millions sent to France are for! Money for old rope!

DeathBanana · 29/06/2026 17:17

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

putupwhatever · 29/06/2026 17:17

RetiredFromExplaining · 29/06/2026 17:14

So what did the men in the RAF do when they weren’t working? Did they go to the pub? Roam around the village? Military men can be pretty misogynistic and have bad attitudes towards women.

well they could drive where they wanted in their cars and they could spend their wages in the local city. They could nip and see their local friends and families. The camp was mixed with families and some single accomodation.

All things that the asylum seekers won't be able to do.

OP posts:
LuckyHazelFox · 29/06/2026 17:17

CaptainMyCaptain · 29/06/2026 17:15

Possibly they're the people either actual relevant experience.

We could all be anything we want on social media. Maybe if the accounts were more believable rather than all these men are courteous etc,.

putupwhatever · 29/06/2026 17:19

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

I know exactly what asylum is. And I know exactly what refugee status is and I know about the process to move between those two things.

I still think putting 1500 asylum seekers in the middle of a tiny village with nothing to do is a really bad idea.

OP posts:
Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.