Help end medical misogyny. Sign our petition.

Help end medical misogyny.
Sign our petition.

Sign the petition

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To worry that the planet is heating faster than we have been led to expect and whether we can cope?

322 replies

100thingstoknowaboutspace · 26/06/2026 15:28

I understand that extreme weather events, including spikes in temperatures and longer heatwaves, are a result of smaller incremental rises in global temperature. But the rate of heat records and large jumps in the temperatures during those spikes and heatwaves that we have experienced during the last 10 years feels off the scale for me, and I am wondering how we can actually cope if it continues at this pace? Climate experts talk about 2 degrees warming by mid century, but if we experience heatwaves that are 5 or more degrees hotter or go on longer than this one, I genuinely don't understand how we will cope. At the moment my flat is only just tolerable - with every measure of cooling I could think of. A few degrees more, and survival is literally threatened. Whereas humans may be able to cope with 5, 10 etc degrees lower, as it is easier to heat up, it seems we are reaching the edge of survivability in terms of being able to stay cool enough to maintain life. Not only here in the UK obviously.

I do believe there is still action that we as individuals and as a country (which in turn may impact other countries) can take, but I am scared that things are worse than even experts, in their carefully hedged or caveated statements and predictions, cause us to believe. I am worried I won't be able to keep my child safe as they grow up.

Grateful if anyone can talk me down from this climate anxiety - and also, grateful for insight about what might be most effective for us to do.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
7
1dayatatime · 26/06/2026 17:21

JoyousOpalLemur · 26/06/2026 17:07

The biggest thing you can do to reduce carbon emissions?

Not have children.

Maybe Mumsnet isn't the best place for this discussion lol.

Not having children is by far the most cost effective means of reducing carbon emissions.

And it's not just carbon emissions, a lower population also reduces all other types of environmental impact from intensive farming, micro plastics, rubbish pollution, deforestation, marine pollution and over fishing etc etc.

It would also be economically beneficial- same resources with less people to share it around. In the case of the UK it doesn't matter if this is through lower levels of migration or less births or both. I always shake my head when I see posts saying that we need to grow the UK population in order to grow the economy, when the opposite is the case.

But as you correctly point out this is not a popular opinion on MN and it's far easier to blame big business.

TooBigForMyBoots · 26/06/2026 17:23

JoyousOpalLemur · 26/06/2026 17:14

In the 1970s the accepted science was that we would have an ice age by about 2010.

By about 1995 it was accepted that most of the planet would be under water by about 2025.

It's all a load of nonsense.

Poppycock. Even in the 1970s scientific climate consensus predicted global warming. As for most of the planet will be underwater by 2025!🤯

Maybe you should base your understanding in actual evidence, rather than movies you've seen.🙈

Husaria · 26/06/2026 17:24

Itsnouse · 26/06/2026 17:09

I think you would be wrong about being able to import food, and the same goes for us in the UK. We know we cannot produce enough to feed our population and if global warming reduces food production in places like Pakistan or South Africa there won’t be anything to import. Countries will stop exports to enable them to feed their own population.

Food security or lack of is an area that had been neglected. We use farming land to build on or for solar farms.

Well, the last resort is using dead humans as food. I'm sure our industry would create something palatable.

backformoreofthesame · 26/06/2026 17:24

Most of our planet IS underwater

Anarchy99 · 26/06/2026 17:25

The fact is mankind has fucked up and I think its possible that the generation who will see the planet burn have already been born.

Even on a recycling thread recently people were proud of not lifting a finger because apparently their actions are irrelevant.

Nowisthetimeforicecream · 26/06/2026 17:25

I haven't heard any interviews with scientists who are surprised by the current heat.

SistarSystem · 26/06/2026 17:25

6ate9 · 26/06/2026 17:17

We are ALL going to die. Is it ethical to have children, if you know they’re going to suffer?

Yes, we are all going to die - that is true for sure! But I can't tell if you are predicting the end of days imminently or just stating that everybody has to die at some point.

Your question about whether it is ethical to have children when you know they will suffer is an interesting one. For me, I think that suffering and hardship are an inevitable part of life (well, Bhudda said it first tbh). You certainly shouldn't have children only because you believe their lives will be guaranteed to be comfortable. That is, and never had been, true.

There is no concensus among scientists that children born in the uk today will die imminently due to climate change. But if you really believe the end is nigh, I am sure there is not a lot I can do to deter you.

I will continue to do what I can for humans and the planet, but it is certainly a lot easier to say "no point, we're all doomed anyway", which is what you seem to be doing? Possibly I have misread

Nowisthetimeforicecream · 26/06/2026 17:26

Husaria · 26/06/2026 17:24

Well, the last resort is using dead humans as food. I'm sure our industry would create something palatable.

Probably just shape it like sausages and no one would really be able to tell anyway,

6ate9 · 26/06/2026 17:27

Atleastitsnotsunstroke · 26/06/2026 15:56

It's not the heat we will need to worry about as much as the lack of food when we can't grow or import it.

And lack of drinking water!!!

SistarSystem · 26/06/2026 17:27

1dayatatime · 26/06/2026 17:21

Not having children is by far the most cost effective means of reducing carbon emissions.

And it's not just carbon emissions, a lower population also reduces all other types of environmental impact from intensive farming, micro plastics, rubbish pollution, deforestation, marine pollution and over fishing etc etc.

It would also be economically beneficial- same resources with less people to share it around. In the case of the UK it doesn't matter if this is through lower levels of migration or less births or both. I always shake my head when I see posts saying that we need to grow the UK population in order to grow the economy, when the opposite is the case.

But as you correctly point out this is not a popular opinion on MN and it's far easier to blame big business.

I applaud people who choose not to have children for the sake of the planet and this is said a lot on here. I have no idea why anyone thinks this is a new or original opinion on mumsnet or anywhere else

MartinAston · 26/06/2026 17:27

Yanbu. It is happening, it's here, it's getting rapidly worse, your anxiety is completely justified.

The Met Office have modelled that with a 2 degree rise overall (we already surpassed 1.5 degrees in 2024), by 2050 the UK will be getting heatwaves going up to 43-45 degrees. As well as a lot more storms and flooding.

Not to mention what's happening elsewhere in the world and the knock-on effects eg large scale migration, food supply etc.

And the UK government wants to allow the "Rosebank" oil field to be developed, creating vastly more emissions than many countries put together. Google Stop Rosebank for more details and something you CAN do.

RedTagAlan · 26/06/2026 17:30

AskingQuestionsAllTheTime · 26/06/2026 17:18

Except in 2003 (38.5°C), 2018 (35.6°C), 2019 (38.7°C), and 2022, in which year over 40.2°C was recorded in London and 40.3°C in Lincolnshire. 2025 wasn't as blazing hot on any one day, but went over 35°C for longer, and did it four times, so it's "the hottest year on record".

It got as high as 35.1°C on 26th May this year, I am told. But it's got to 37.1°C this week and is probably still rising, though not expected to go over 39°C

In 1976 the hottest temperature recorded was 35.9°C in Cheltenham in July, so it held the record until 2003.

Good data there.

And as usual, many people are only registering the peaks. We don't notice if a February is on average 2 deg warmer. But the scientists do.

And I think this has been part of the problem. Because the nations in the tropics who get the worst effects of climate change have less power to influence global action than those nations in the temperate zones. By the time the folk in the temperate zones are seeing it, the tropics are nearing the cusp.

JoyousOpalLemur · 26/06/2026 17:30

TooBigForMyBoots · 26/06/2026 17:23

Poppycock. Even in the 1970s scientific climate consensus predicted global warming. As for most of the planet will be underwater by 2025!🤯

Maybe you should base your understanding in actual evidence, rather than movies you've seen.🙈

Hate to provide some facts, but that's exactly what was predicted

https://iseethics.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/the-cooling-world-newsweek-april-28-1975.pdf

https://time.com/archive/6878023/another-ice-age/

As for the more recent predictions - do you really want me to post a screenshot of Greta Thunberg's tweet which she later deleted about the world being under water by the mid 2020s?

Thought not!

https://iseethics.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/the-cooling-world-newsweek-april-28-1975.pdf

hairbearbunches · 26/06/2026 17:31

One thing is sure, on a personal level people will have to remain lucky. That's all there is to it. Governments are not going to help.

We currently have a government hell bent on sticking up houses and solar on agricultural land to house an increase in the population that we can neither feed or guarantee water for. We should have been looking at decreasing the population,not increasing it by 15 million. We should have been spending money on retro fitting solar shade to schools, hospitals etc, not paying out welfare benefits to people we didn't need to have here.

The wankers we have elected over the last 50 years have spent all that time feathering their own nests and trying to become members of the global elite.

If people aren't angry, they should be.

InterestedDad37 · 26/06/2026 17:33

JoyousOpalLemur · 26/06/2026 17:09

It requires an intensive amount of energy to produce solar panels and they only last for about 20 years, and can't be recycled.

That claim that they're great for the environment?

It was made by the solar industry who learnt so much from the tobacco, plastic and oil industries.

80% + of materials in solar panels can be recovered, recycled and/or repurposed.

MyGhastIsFlabbered · 26/06/2026 17:33

ThePeppyOpalScroller · 26/06/2026 15:32

All those "reports" are paid for by people with a vested interest in getting you to part with your money. Ever noticed how the answer to "climate change" is always a levy, tarrif or fine? Calm down. It's all hype.

How can you say that when the evidence is literally all around us?

AskingQuestionsAllTheTime · 26/06/2026 17:35

nomas · 26/06/2026 16:48

And we haven't even got into the profound impact on other countries.

Countries like Bangladesh and Pakistan, who consume vastly less resources than us in the UK, are at the top of the vulnerability list due to monsoon flooding, glacial melting and coastline erosion.

In Sub-Saharan Africa, countries like Chad and Mali are warming at a much faster rate than us and experiencing both flooding and droughts and the resultant impact on food supply.

For them it isn't a future disaster, they are bearing the brunt now.

Edited

We could spare a thought for small countries which are in the process of simply ceasing to exist; their islands are vanishing, or have vanished, because the water level round them has risen (on account of climate change has started to accelerate).

https://sciencesensei.com/30-islands-disappearing-now-and-10-already-lost-forever-due-to-climate-change/

30 Islands Disappearing Now and 10 Already Lost Forever Due To Climate Change

Water keeps coming. Inch by inch, year after year. IPCC data show oceans rising 4.62mm...

https://sciencesensei.com/30-islands-disappearing-now-and-10-already-lost-forever-due-to-climate-change/

DdraigGoch · 26/06/2026 17:39

CurdinHenry · 26/06/2026 15:43

We've been promised imminent cataclysm since 1980. We just need to improve tech to keep people cool.

We also need to improve passive cooling. Less tarmac, concrete and astroturf; more trees.

MrsMurphyIWish · 26/06/2026 17:40

Nowisthetimeforicecream · 26/06/2026 17:26

Probably just shape it like sausages and no one would really be able to tell anyway,

There is already a dystopian novel about cannibalism in a world where human flesh is reared, it's called 'Tender is the Flesh'.

TooBigForMyBoots · 26/06/2026 17:47

JoyousOpalLemur · 26/06/2026 17:30

Hate to provide some facts, but that's exactly what was predicted

https://iseethics.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/the-cooling-world-newsweek-april-28-1975.pdf

https://time.com/archive/6878023/another-ice-age/

As for the more recent predictions - do you really want me to post a screenshot of Greta Thunberg's tweet which she later deleted about the world being under water by the mid 2020s?

Thought not!

It was a minority viewpoint amongst climate scientists in the 1970s, when the consus was for global warming. By the early 1980s it was already known as the Global Cooling Myth.

journals.ametsoc.org/view/journals/bams/89/9/2008bams2370_1.xml

Twattergy · 26/06/2026 17:47

Those in denial about the material impact this will have on our lives wont be as relaxed when we in the UK are regularly facing water scarcity, heat related shut downs and significant food system failures. This will happen within short decades. Everyone telling us to relax about it now are part of the problem, because no one in power is being forced to prepare properly on our behalf. So much more action could be taken now on a systemic level to protect us heading into a hotter, drier and less productive future. But just go on denying...help us all just drift into a worse future.

SistarSystem · 26/06/2026 17:47

MrsMurphyIWish · 26/06/2026 17:40

There is already a dystopian novel about cannibalism in a world where human flesh is reared, it's called 'Tender is the Flesh'.

See also Soilent Green and The Road!

Let's hope it doesn't come to that of course! But it does come up a lot in dystopia future movies and books

MotherofPearl · 26/06/2026 17:49

I absolutely share your worries OP.

WheretheFishesareFrightening · 26/06/2026 17:49

backformoreofthesame · 26/06/2026 17:07

Things don’t happen overnight

i I think that’s part of the difficulty - people find it difficult to understand that the inflation we have seen in coffee and chocolate is a direct result of climate change

people struggle to understand that crop yields will on average decline even if we still have crops - and that means higher prices next year

until it goes really bad and a high humidity/temperature leads to people dying in the street

we don’t yet know how many people in the uk have died as a direct result of this exceptional heatwave and because it’s reported months later , and it’s not your mother or child , the distance from the cause makes it easier to minimise everything

Yeah absolutely, but I was sort of expecting fundamental changes to my life by 2030, which is now pretty close. I can see and understand the changes we have now, I just expected worse by this juncture. I’m not looking at the weather and going “no one warned me about this!”. But I have been making changes (not on any meaningful scale, because I can’t) around having solar panels, air conditioning, off grid essentials, electric car, reduced consumption, offset of air travel because of the awareness I have of the issue.

6ate9 · 26/06/2026 17:50

SistarSystem · 26/06/2026 17:25

Yes, we are all going to die - that is true for sure! But I can't tell if you are predicting the end of days imminently or just stating that everybody has to die at some point.

Your question about whether it is ethical to have children when you know they will suffer is an interesting one. For me, I think that suffering and hardship are an inevitable part of life (well, Bhudda said it first tbh). You certainly shouldn't have children only because you believe their lives will be guaranteed to be comfortable. That is, and never had been, true.

There is no concensus among scientists that children born in the uk today will die imminently due to climate change. But if you really believe the end is nigh, I am sure there is not a lot I can do to deter you.

I will continue to do what I can for humans and the planet, but it is certainly a lot easier to say "no point, we're all doomed anyway", which is what you seem to be doing? Possibly I have misread

I agree hardship and suffering is a part of life but if you knew the suffering was going to be unimaginably hard caused by us, would you want children?

We all want a comfortable life, we want to consume whatever we like if we have the means. Is anyone willing to give up the things that contribute to climate change, when they make their life worth living?

Swipe left for the next trending thread