Help end medical misogyny. Sign our petition.

Help end medical misogyny.
Sign our petition.

Sign the petition

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

George’s education costs

525 replies

Honest23 · 16/06/2026 17:53

Who here would honestly happily contribute to George’s education costs?

Reported to be £68000 a year at Eton.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
5
38thparallel · 17/06/2026 18:45

Most MPs and royals who went to Eton are narcissistic, unempathic psychopaths.

Is Prince William a psychopath? What particular traits does he have that makes him a psychopath?

countrylife00 · 17/06/2026 18:49

Araminta1003 · 17/06/2026 10:46

“Utter nonsense
You sound very triggered by a peaceful protest.
The Windsors knew the protesters would be there . They chose to parade the children - why?”

@Ukisgaslit - there is nothing “peaceful” about booing children. It is disgraceful behaviour.
And yes I feel for them because my 12 year old and his friends were recently aggressively accosted in Central London by animal rights activists for eating an icecream.
Nobody should be allowed to accost or boo any children. There should be laws against it, including taking children to protests in the first place.

That was brave of them picking on 12 year olds.
i hope they shoved their ice creams right into their weasel faces!

Giantmarshmallowbum · 17/06/2026 18:52

countrylife00 · 17/06/2026 18:39

Eh up it’s Mumsy with the big bumsy being unkind again….

👍🏻👍🏻😁

Great to have a follower, keep it up

<spanks mighty fine ass>

Isinglass20 · 17/06/2026 18:56

Ooh how many times. School fees will
be paid by his parents, tax payers will bear security costs
Frankly in view of the current uneducated coarse Head of State of the US then give me our Royals every time. And no doubt so do the Canadians.
I note the Danish Royals have not leapt to support Greenland, and consider other HOStates eg (Putin) so we should count our blessings.

SleepingStandingUp · 17/06/2026 18:59

wishingonastar101 · 17/06/2026 14:32

Its disgusting. Why do we pay for that little brat to get a diamond encrusted education and my kids are in 9 form with no maths, English or science teachers...

Well I don't know George as well as you do, seeing as you know he's a brat. Are you kids friends? Do you pop over and have a coffee with Kate to commiserate on her failure as a parent?

Anyway, none of that is linked to your going to a shit school. Not sure what a 9 form is but what options have you explored to move them to a school with teachers?

I think you'd do better lobbying your local MP about that than asking for a refund on George's education.

Shellyshep · 17/06/2026 19:17

I’m pretty sure we don’t pay for it but he seems like a nice kid so let me know where I need to send my 0.0017p annually and I’ll gladly do it….

riceuten · 17/06/2026 19:27

I honestly couldn't care less about the monarchy - other than objecting giving money to already rich people.

And spare me the "Oh, they attract tourists" drivel - the Chateau at Versailles was completely deserted last time I visited - oh...hang on.

But, as far as I am aware, other than the usual shameless forking over of gazillions of pounds for the royals, I don't think we are being asked to pony up anything extra, That said, if Eton closed tomorrow, I would cry no bitter hot salty tears of regret.

Araminta1003 · 17/06/2026 20:06

“That was brave of them picking on 12 year olds.
i hope they shoved their ice creams right into their weasel faces!”

@countrylife00 - no, they are nerdy little grammar school boys and one has Arfid and is autistic. So the last thing his mum needs is more putting him off food!
And actually, these activists had aggressive looking dogs with them. One of the 12 year old managed a sly photo of it all.
It is really disgraceful.
Just as booing royal children, who for security reasons, are probably quite sheltered.

There are a lot of hateful losers around and I want them regulated and policed. The twatish behaviour needs to stop. Hashtag not in my name of democracy. These people are taking the piss out of our democracy and value system.

CathyorClaire · 17/06/2026 20:17

And spare me the "Oh, they attract tourists" drivel

Agree entirely. This thoroughly debunked nonsense is invariably trotted out as fact on these threads.

I think I read upthread the coronation was supposed to have delivered a £2bn boost to the economy.

It did but that boost was offset by each bank holiday costing the economy a similar figure so no gains there.

I also read something about the SG being increased to 25% to pay for the repairs to BP.

Worth noting these repairs were twice deemed to be comfortably covered by the existing formula then inexplicably ballooned to a bloated £369m. A figure which was presented to Teresa May's government and obsequiously waved through without question.

grumpygrape · 17/06/2026 20:18

riceuten · 17/06/2026 19:27

I honestly couldn't care less about the monarchy - other than objecting giving money to already rich people.

And spare me the "Oh, they attract tourists" drivel - the Chateau at Versailles was completely deserted last time I visited - oh...hang on.

But, as far as I am aware, other than the usual shameless forking over of gazillions of pounds for the royals, I don't think we are being asked to pony up anything extra, That said, if Eton closed tomorrow, I would cry no bitter hot salty tears of regret.

I'm old, I've had a glass of wine, 🍷, please joint the dots between whether our Royal family attract tourism and the business of the Palace of Versailles when you visited.
If it's any help, the PoV was extremely busy when we visited.

Araminta1003 · 17/06/2026 20:19

“Worth noting these repairs were twice deemed to be comfortably covered by the existing formula then inexplicably ballooned to a bloated £369m. A figure which was presented to Teresa May's government and obsequiously waved through without question.”

It is peanuts compared to Westminster repairs estimated between 11-40 billion. The heritage buildings are worth preserving, Unfortunately it is extremely expensive to do it properly.

countrylife00 · 17/06/2026 20:21

Be proud of them. And I would be tempted to post that picture….

MulberryBrandy · 17/06/2026 20:23

Araminta1003 · 17/06/2026 20:19

“Worth noting these repairs were twice deemed to be comfortably covered by the existing formula then inexplicably ballooned to a bloated £369m. A figure which was presented to Teresa May's government and obsequiously waved through without question.”

It is peanuts compared to Westminster repairs estimated between 11-40 billion. The heritage buildings are worth preserving, Unfortunately it is extremely expensive to do it properly.

The tax payer has to pay for the maintenance of the other royal palaces like Kensington and St James. This was highlighted recently because the York sisters have an apartment - one in each. So Charles pays their rent but the taxpayer pays for the upkeep. They are not working royals.

countrylife00 · 17/06/2026 20:24

riceuten · 17/06/2026 19:27

I honestly couldn't care less about the monarchy - other than objecting giving money to already rich people.

And spare me the "Oh, they attract tourists" drivel - the Chateau at Versailles was completely deserted last time I visited - oh...hang on.

But, as far as I am aware, other than the usual shameless forking over of gazillions of pounds for the royals, I don't think we are being asked to pony up anything extra, That said, if Eton closed tomorrow, I would cry no bitter hot salty tears of regret.

Visit The Tower of London. Always packed out.
And those Royal Jewels, you will never see anything so beautiful.
Then a little afternoon tea at Fortnum and Masons, favourite shop of the Royals.

CathyorClaire · 17/06/2026 20:24

Just as booing royal children, who for security reasons, are probably quite sheltered.

I don't think the boos were directed at the children specifically but the elder two at least are of an age where they're capable of gently absorbing the idea that not everyone supports a monarchy.

I think if anything it might be an opportune time for the royals to consider dropping the long-standing idea that children might make convenient heat shields.

croydon15 · 17/06/2026 20:27

Do you expect him to attend the local comprehensive OP ?

Araminta1003 · 17/06/2026 20:32

“I don't think the boos were directed at the children specifically but the elder two at least are of an age where they're capable of gently absorbing the idea that not everyone supports a monarchy.
I think if anything it might be an opportune time for the royals to consider dropping the long-standing idea that children might make convenient heat shields.”

No @CathyorClaire - the protestors know full well children are vulnerable and impressionable and the protestors are most likely enjoying the power trip as well. And the kids aren’t heat shields. They have come to celebrate their grandfather who has cancer and has given his life to duty. William does not know how many years his father has left and he is there to support him.

By the way, the new bank notes to be issued by the Bank of England will have animals on them, British wildlife not monarchs. You can vote on which ones you prefer. My son has voted. Despite the animal rights activists trying to put him off nature and animals. He remains a keen animal lover, just like King Charles.

CathyorClaire · 17/06/2026 20:33

It is peanuts compared to Westminster repairs estimated between 11-40 billion.

Westminster is a working building used daily.

None of the royals want to live in BP.

If we're forced to fund its repairs, maybe it should be opened fully as a museum with ticket takings reverting to the treasury rather than yet another dimly lit royal arm.

Araminta1003 · 17/06/2026 20:39

Buckingham Palace probably will be one day. But it notionally belongs to the British people. Or do you want it put up for sale to the likes of Elon Musk or even someone like Vladimir Putin? It is British heritage and should be maintained.

CathyorClaire · 17/06/2026 20:42

the protestors know full well children are vulnerable and impressionable and the protestors are most likely enjoying the power trip as well. And the kids aren’t heat shields. They have come to celebrate their grandfather who has cancer and has given his life to duty. William does not know how many years his father has left and he is there to support him.

I disagree entirely.

The protestors didn't hide their agenda or intention and BP undoubtedly monitor the website.

Perfectly possible for the children to celebrate Grandad's big day in private after the public display and I don't doubt there was provision made for such.

W should be there more often for Papa. Lazy.

ChocolateAddictAlways · 17/06/2026 21:19

Given that the monarchy is incredibly wealthy and has more than enough money to pay for private education I don't think taxpayers should fund this (although as I understand we don't...but the issue of whether it's 1 pence per person is irrelevant).

TheDrsDocMartens · 17/06/2026 21:24

Going off the last few PMs who went there I’d rather he got a better education…

Araminta1003 · 17/06/2026 21:27

@CathyorClaire - it does not matter what you think. If it was harassing, alarming or distressing to the children it can still constitute an offence under the Public Order Act. Hope some of themget done for it. Completely reasonably foreseeable to any standard human that children are more likely to be sensitive about these things. Hence best to not intimidate children or approach them!

A person likely to be caused alarm is enough of a threshold. They knew the kids will be there and many of the protestors are on camera. And good luck arguing it is reasonable conduct. It is not.

Harassment, alarm or distress.
(1)A person is guilty of an offence if he—
(a)uses threatening [or abusive] words or behaviour, or disorderly behaviour, or
(b)displays any writing, sign or other visible representation which is threatening [or abusive],
within the hearing or sight of a person likely to be caused harassment, alarm or distress thereby.
(2)An offence under this section may be committed in a public or a private place, except that no offence is committed where the words or behaviour are used, or the writing, sign or other visible representation is displayed, by a person inside a dwelling and the other person is also inside that or another dwelling.
(3)It is a defence for the accused to prove—
(a)that he had no reason to believe that there was any person within hearing or sight who was likely to be caused harassment, alarm or distress, or
(b)that he was inside a dwelling and had no reason to believe that the words or behaviour used, or the writing, sign or other visible representation displayed, would be heard or seen by a person outside that or any other dwelling, or
(c)that his conduct was reasonable.
(4). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(5). . . . . .
(6)A person guilty of an offence under this section is liable on summary conviction to a fine not exceeding level 3 on the standard scale.

CathyorClaire · 17/06/2026 21:30

If it was harassing, alarming or distressing to the children it can still constitute an offence under the Public Order Act. Hope some of themget done for it. Completely reasonably foreseeable to any standard human that children are more likely to be sensitive about these things. Hence best to not intimidate children or approach them!

Hence my suggestion it might be better to leave them out of the hurly-burly...

Araminta1003 · 17/06/2026 21:31

No @CathyorClaire - it is for the protestors who are adults to know the law and for the police to bring the charges.