Help end medical misogyny. Sign our petition.

Help end medical misogyny.
Sign our petition.

Sign the petition

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

to be utterly sick of protests, marches, rallies, and riots

1000 replies

NameChangeMay2026 · Yesterday 01:47

What happened today in Belfast was dreadful. Of course it was.

When Sarah Everard died, there were marches. But a day before she died, an Indian woman Sarah's age was knifed to death in the street in Leicestershire. It was an "honour" killing, I think.

Where was HER lantern on the doorstep of Downing Street? Where was HER march?

My point is, dreadful things happen every day and I am so sick and tired of news items sparking so much public rowdiness. It used to be that the media could report on current events without starting a riot. I know that we have always had riots, but they were the occasional one. And because they were not common, they helped effect change. They were a desperate measure reserved for when nothing else had helped.

Now, together with marches, rallies, and protests, society is constantly disrupted, and I am so, so sick of it. I live in a major city and I can't go anywhere without checking what march, rally, protest, or riot is happening, especially at the weekends. And they are so common that they don't help effect change anymore.

The riots are terrible. Thousands and thousands of pounds' worth of lost property in fires, injured bystanders, police calld away from other duties to attend them. And there are "professional" rabble-rousers who travel to marches, protests, and riots. It's not because they're passionate about a cause. They're just passionate about causing trouble.

I travel for work to major American cities and it's even worse over there. Another day, another riot/protest/march/rally.

They have become a feature of today's society, and I wish they would just stop.

Edit: I actually stay in more because of them. I don't go out of my hotel as much when staying in America, and I don't go to the city centre where I live as much. It's so bad when regular people are put off from walking around city centres because of all these annoying dickheads.

I think it is worse in America, and I'm tired of feeling scared to go out when there, in case I run into an uncontrolled crowd - where the police have guns, and the protestors might, depending on the state.

The burning buildings in Belfast are a disgrace. It's not the owners' fault that this happened.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
13
BrightShaker · Yesterday 12:33

samthepigeon · Yesterday 12:10

Is there stats that say recent immigrants are more likely to be sectioned?

The government are cagey about the stats but if you just think logically, of course recent immigrants are more likely to experience significant MH problems including being sectioned under the MHA if compared to the general population. Asylum seekers even more so.

Ginnyweasleyswand · Yesterday 12:33

Dandelionsalad · Yesterday 12:30

the general public really need to understand that the UK desperately needs quite high levels of immigrants for this country to function. The vast majority of asylum seekers, unaccompanied minors or legal migrants come and contribute significantly and positively to the functioning of the country.

This is very much not true. The majority of illegal immigrants do not bring any skills with them and the majority of immigrants were recently found to live in poverty which means they are not making a net contribution to the country.

It costs something like 500k (I saw this figure recently) when processing asylum claims for 2.5 years. If you had all that money to put into schools and public services and, I don't know, increase carer pay so local people found it cost effective to do it as a job, then it might solve quite a lot.

It's bollocks we need this type of immigrant. Yes, we need higher skilled immigrants. They tend to come via legal routes anyway.

Flyingintotheunknown · Yesterday 12:35

Walkyrie · Yesterday 12:32

Did they 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

Something to that effect yes! 😂

labtest57 · Yesterday 12:36

Pineforests · Yesterday 09:36

Every country in the world has misogynist cultures. Ireland's domestic abuse stats are horrifying.

So why allow in more?

ijustwanttoworkout · Yesterday 12:36

Stick0rTwist · Yesterday 12:31

Agreed OP - the pro Palestine ones are the worst/most prolific and why the government hasn’t clamped down I don’t know. Always disruptive & violent.

And the Just Stop Oil preventing people from getting to work. Disgraceful.

Sorry?

Setting houses alight is better than protesting genocide?

Jellox · Yesterday 12:36

Ginnyweasleyswand · Yesterday 12:24

Someone made a decision to give the Sudanese man who attempted to behead someone a visa for 5 years (I presume after he came to Ireland illegally). That was a choice. They didn't have to and it turns out that was the wrong decision. So will we have any scrutiny of how that decision was made? Did they look at the risks he posed or just his 'rights', despite having already broken one law by having come here illegally in the first place.

You are correct and anyone coming into the country should be checked for criminal convictions or mental health.

I think mental health is a tricky one as if someone has PTSD or schizophrenia or something then they could be ‘normal’ for a while and then snap.

The medical evidence is all built on white males and so women and anyone non-white are often overlooked or given the wrong treatment/diagnosis.

So I agree that anyone entering the country should be screened for disorders, however this has nothing to do with setting fires and attention to kill children.

The violence from these thugs has actually overshadowed the real issues here and no one’s going to ask the important questions whilst there’s people setting streets on fire and acting like animals.

Persephonia1966 · Yesterday 12:36

Ginnyweasleyswand · Yesterday 12:20

Not all immigrants commit more crime, there is credible evidence Afghan men commit more crime but also they exhibit massively anti-women and children behaviour and beliefs before you even get to crime. It depends where they come from. Not all immigrants should be lumped in together, some come from countries with broadly similar values to us. Some, such as Afghans, come from a country where there is no age of consent for children, girls as young as 9 are sold as sex slaves, and women are treated worse than dogs.

Also young men commit more crime in general (in both native and immigrant populations), however illegal immigrants skew heavily towards being young men.

We do have lots and lots of violent crime and sex crimes which are going up massively among the native and legal immigrant population and not enough prison space - we have enough problems with little positive change for the better. Therefore allowing in greater numbers of exactly the demographic by age and sex that are likely to commit the most crime when they've already committed the crime of arriving illegally seems pretty stupid to me. We could choose to just let in women and their close family - inherently a much lower risk and probably also those who are more vulnerable in their home countries and in greater need of refuge / asylum.

Also, it's a choice to let in potential criminals. We don't have to and as the figures show we have more than enough problems here, why add to it with obviously risky additions?

https://news.sky.com/story/fact-checking-farage-are-foreigners-more-likely-than-britons-to-commit-sexual-offences-13407029

The data is likely very poor so there is a lot of debate but you'll note that even in the article above, there is a suggestion that Afghan men have offending rates much higher than the native population. The Casey report into grooming gangs said that 2/3 of perpetrators did not have their ethnicity recorded. Why not? It's a choice.

All the choices seem to head in one direction which is prioritising people coming into this country illegally over those already here (both legal immigrants and British citizens).

We do have lots and lots of violent crime and sex crimes which are going up massively among the native and legal immigrant population and not enough prison space

You are right about prison space but violent crime isn't going up. It is 2/3rds lower than in the 90s. It reached it's lowest point around 2010 and then started slowly rising until it peaked around 2022/2023 being about a third higher than in 2010 but still lower than the 90s. The pandemic caused a big temporary jump in DV murders. Probably because women were isolated in their homes with their abusers. Rape is hard to compare because the laws have changed so eg marital rape is a crime and more likely to be reported to police as such. Likewise awareness campaigns around what rape is mean women are more likely to report offences even if the police/CPSare still crap at securing convictions. Shoplifting I think has also increased which though non violent is a blight on people's lives. And also hate crimes/non crime hate incidents but that is likely also due to the laws being new and being recorded as such more than they were. They are also quite subjective.
So there has not been a big dramatic increase in crime although the pandemic complicated stats because it made some crimes go up temporarily and some crimes go down. So any decrease after that could also be normalisation.

ForSnappySwan · Yesterday 12:37

ijustwanttoworkout · Yesterday 12:07

You can express anger.

you can’t go and try to kill people

They can't express their anger and that's partly why it spills out onto the streets.

Most social media companies ban anyone who expressed their anger - and they can even be arrested for it.

Suppressing the free speech has been a big part of the issue.

EasternStandard · Yesterday 12:37

Jellox · Yesterday 12:36

You are correct and anyone coming into the country should be checked for criminal convictions or mental health.

I think mental health is a tricky one as if someone has PTSD or schizophrenia or something then they could be ‘normal’ for a while and then snap.

The medical evidence is all built on white males and so women and anyone non-white are often overlooked or given the wrong treatment/diagnosis.

So I agree that anyone entering the country should be screened for disorders, however this has nothing to do with setting fires and attention to kill children.

The violence from these thugs has actually overshadowed the real issues here and no one’s going to ask the important questions whilst there’s people setting streets on fire and acting like animals.

How can that be done? When Sudan won’t hold records on the violence nor share it

LessonsinChemistryandLove · Yesterday 12:37

Ginnyweasleyswand · Yesterday 12:24

Someone made a decision to give the Sudanese man who attempted to behead someone a visa for 5 years (I presume after he came to Ireland illegally). That was a choice. They didn't have to and it turns out that was the wrong decision. So will we have any scrutiny of how that decision was made? Did they look at the risks he posed or just his 'rights', despite having already broken one law by having come here illegally in the first place.

The application process would have looked at the risks he posed against any evidence such as past criminal history etc. You can’t just say if you come from X country, you can’t come to the UK because in that county there is war and violent crime. So no one from Brazil should be allowed to stay in the UK, or South Africa? Or even America, where you can legally shoot a child who steps on the grass outside your home for trespassing. There is no why to exactly predict human behaviour so mistakes will always be made. We have to look at this through a logical and evidence based lens.

Also worth noting the UK has no legal routes to enter and claim alum and you can’t only claim asylum once you are here.

Another point I’ve seen loads on these threads is why it is often young males claiming asylum. It has always been safer for men to make the often dangerous journey, with the hope that they get her settle and send for the rest of the family. This is not just in cases of asylum but across all types immigration. If there is an able man, he comes first and builds them life for the rest of the family to join .

labtest57 · Yesterday 12:37

EstoyRobandoSuCasa · Yesterday 09:36

Yes, on average, there are one or two murders in the UK per day. It’s revealing to see which ones get the publicity, vigils and protests.

Let’s just say that if you’re a woman who is murdered by her white partner, there are unlikely to be any protests or vigils in your name.

These aren't vigils foe victims they are protests against immigration.

InLoveWithAI · Yesterday 12:38

I cannot believe there are people on this thread defending these rioters.

'they are disillusioned' so bloody what, doesn't give them the right to set people's houses/cars etc on fire.

Ah yes, so sensible and righteous.

MsJinks · Yesterday 12:38

Dandelionsalad · Yesterday 12:28

It was the civil servants and Blair’s Human Rights Act.

It will have been accepted by an asylum caseworker, working under the actual rules and guidance of accepting asylum claims, which is the process, as agreed by the Home Secretary - Suella Braverman it looks like it was then.

You can find the rules, and processes and guidance for caseworkers on gov.uk and you can look at previous versions, as this will probably have been updated since.

I am sure the decision is all being scrutinised letter by letter, and comma by comma, as there will be questions asked about this - you could wait for the answers I guess - but that may include facts.

Walkyrie · Yesterday 12:38

Flyingintotheunknown · Yesterday 12:35

Something to that effect yes! 😂

I am CRYING, even I knew that somebody called Mág Tighearnán is v unlikely to be a migrant in Ireland 😂😂😂😂😂

ForSnappySwan · Yesterday 12:39

Cherriesandapples1 · Yesterday 12:13

I'm happy for people to express their anger at the attempted beheading. That why I said it was also appalling. At what point did I silence you?
I merely pointed out I can think about attempted beheading is appalling and setting fire to people's homes that had nothing to do with the incident is appalling
Expressing anger through mass riot where innocent people are injured, homes burnt down, people could have been killed is not an acceptable reaction
Feel free to peacefully protest, vote for the political parties you agree with, email your MP, talk about it online. But violence against the innocent is disgusting

Agreed that the violence is appalling.

But I suspect the reason for it is because people are fed up with an establishment (social media, mainstream media and politicians) silencing them, ignoring them and calling them stupid whenever they try to express their concerns.

BIossomtoes · Yesterday 12:39

EasternStandard · Yesterday 12:37

How can that be done? When Sudan won’t hold records on the violence nor share it

Edited

How can they share something they haven’t got? Sudan incidentally is in the depths of civil war - record keeping is unlikely to be high on its priority list.

Dollymylove · Yesterday 12:39

Therr were marches for Sarah because she was abducted and murdered by a serving police officer so of course it made headlines. Murder seems so common nowadays that many are only reported on local news platforms. Did the Indian lady's family and community have a march after her death?

labtest57 · Yesterday 12:40

BIossomtoes · Yesterday 09:40

Complete nonsense. NHS pay scales don’t differ according to the nationality of the employee.

Its not nonsense that British medical graduates cannot get jobs.

Brunchatstephanies · Yesterday 12:40

Cailleach1 · Yesterday 12:13

@Jellox ‘The men who saved the man in Belfast were immigrants too, so you cannot imply that it’s immigration that’s the issue.’

Just wondering about this. Do you mean the chappie with the hurley stick who tried to whack the perpetrator off the victim?

His name is reported to be Maitiu Mag Tighearnan. I am just wondering where he had immigrated from with his very Irish name.

Sorry I paused and laughed at this too.

Walkyrie · Yesterday 12:40

BIossomtoes · Yesterday 12:39

How can they share something they haven’t got? Sudan incidentally is in the depths of civil war - record keeping is unlikely to be high on its priority list.

So let’s not let in any ‘asylum seekers’ as we have fuck all idea who they are in a country dominated by militants?

kirinm · Yesterday 12:41

PurpleAxe · Yesterday 02:40

Then you need for people to trust that justice will be done.

People do not feel like they can trust the government, the police, ANY of the establishment at the moment.

And so, as they ever have, they will make their own arrangements.

Every light sentence, every blind eye, every drop in living conditions. The pressure has been building as people are being told to swallow more pain.

And now the dam has burst.

And what is that mistrust based on? The shit being spouted by far right politicians that there is two tier justice which is not the case.

Cherriesandapples1 · Yesterday 12:42

ForSnappySwan · Yesterday 12:37

They can't express their anger and that's partly why it spills out onto the streets.

Most social media companies ban anyone who expressed their anger - and they can even be arrested for it.

Suppressing the free speech has been a big part of the issue.

Unless you're inciting violence or being out and out racist, then why what exactly would you be banned from social media for, what crime would you be arrested for?
You can post about it on social media or surely Mumsnet would have already banned you? So how is your free speech being suppressed?

EasternStandard · Yesterday 12:42

Walkyrie · Yesterday 12:40

So let’s not let in any ‘asylum seekers’ as we have fuck all idea who they are in a country dominated by militants?

Yep exactly. There are no checks, it’s not possible.

ijustwanttoworkout · Yesterday 12:42

I wonder if this lot will turn on the victim as fast as they did Henry Nowak, knowing that the victim isn’t Irish.

Sadcafe · Yesterday 12:44

I agree the riots are an unnecessary response and for the most part caused by agitators rather than peaceful demonstrators trying to make a point. Unfortunately though, whilst the continued attacks by people who are either seeking asylum or yet to be processed or those who just want to promote their own radical ideology continue, they are unlikely to stop

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread