Woah, @Pinkbasketcase , if you read my first contribution to the thread, and indeed the one you're objecting to, you can see that I am very much on your side. I think a couple should have each other's backs while out, and check in on each other, and spend some time apart and some together but with a mn eye to the other one being ok throughout. Neither person should be left on their own sadly, while their spouse dances with others and avoids them. And equally, neither person should expect their partner to do all the social heavy lifting for them and just stand next to them expectantly waiting to be brought in.
I think your DH is not thinking of you quite enough, and you should have a chat. I don't think you are hanging around being clingy, from what I can see.
The other example I gave was of a different kind of weird behaviour- and yes it was weird. The women were perfectly happy socialising around the room talking to their own friends, both male and female. They were not left out or sad they were socialising separately..But the men seemed to cluster in awkward single sex groups. When I, a woman, broke into any such group and participated in chatting - because that's what skilful social interaction, and being a good guest,looks like - the women stopped what they were doing and came to join. It was funny because it was done hastily as though there was some terrific social dangers afoot. And I tested it by doing it several times. I could only conclude that in their rather provincial setting, my behaviour was a discomforting break from the norm.
These weren't women who wanted to spend time with their spouses or were sad that they had been ditched by their spouses during thr party. They were territory marking, in a genuinely weird and completely unnecessary way.
Having said that, if that is someone's expectation in their relationship - that they guard their spouse from laughing in a group with someone of the opposite sex - then yes I do judge that, it's a silly attitude which lacks social nuance. If you think that's reasonable then maybe the problem does lie with you, though I originally thought you had a very reasonable point.