Help end medical misogyny. Sign our petition.

Help end medical misogyny.
Sign our petition.

Sign the petition

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Young people in the UK have it tough

309 replies

JiIttiIg · 01/06/2026 20:59

All the news stories are about young people not getting jobs and having to stay with their parents. It used to be they had to stay at home to save for a house, now it's no house and no jobs. Can't see things getting any better in the near future. Is the UK now a country that is failing it's young people. Is it going to be like countries from Eastern or Southern Europe where young people had to outmigrate in order to get a decent life? Can't see any politicians having the right answers.

OP posts:
footbeds · Yesterday 07:23

Governments haven’t invested in the young and here we are.

EasternEcho · Yesterday 07:24

OneTealShaker · Yesterday 07:23

The luddites had the same attitude. It’s always cyclical history repeating itself.

Right. You have made an utterly compelling argument. It's the immigrants, and benefits. 👏

WhatNoRaisins · Yesterday 07:25

TooTiredToCareAnymore88 · Yesterday 07:20

You can't give up job seeking because then you are sanctioned.

You can still do the minimum with job interviews or try and go on the sick. Looking at the lives of the working poor I can't really blame people for doing that.

JuliaBraverman · Yesterday 07:25

OneTealShaker · Yesterday 07:22

Exactly. That not the fault of AI. Therefore AI is not the reason that young people in this country are screwed. It’s the fault of incompetent, thick and corrupt politicians and successive governments that the country is declining and not keeping up. No one is stopping this country from inventing, promoting innovation, investing in business, attracting funding. Except for the government and those who want to spend everything on benefits.

This

OneTealShaker · Yesterday 07:27

EasternEcho · Yesterday 07:24

Right. You have made an utterly compelling argument. It's the immigrants, and benefits. 👏

Thanks

MynameisnotJohn · Yesterday 07:27

I have three young adults all still at home. I do constantly remind them that there are always problems wherever in the world people live and they are massively lucky to live in a country that other people are desperate to live in.
I have nephews and nieces who have moved to Australia and the US. Mixed experiences. They are conflicted about staying away forever although seem to be doing better than the ones left behind.

Newname26 · Yesterday 07:28

I don't think increasing retirement age is helping either.
Limited number of jobs, why encourage older people to stay in them not opening up space at the bottom of the ladder?

I know far too many young people with degrees under emoloyed working in pubs. Its crazy.

TyroneBarkleyManofValueNSOUL · Yesterday 07:28

EasternEcho · Yesterday 07:24

Right. You have made an utterly compelling argument. It's the immigrants, and benefits. 👏

The sarcasm of your post was missed.😁

TooTiredToCareAnymore88 · Yesterday 07:28

WhatNoRaisins · Yesterday 07:25

You can still do the minimum with job interviews or try and go on the sick. Looking at the lives of the working poor I can't really blame people for doing that.

UC will know if you are just doing the bare minimum.

JetFlight · Yesterday 07:28

footbeds · Yesterday 07:23

Governments haven’t invested in the young and here we are.

I think there are plenty of opportunities for the young to train and get further education, it’s the step after that that’s screwed. The jobs just aren’t there. Plenty of well educated young people out of work.

WhatNoRaisins · Yesterday 07:33

TooTiredToCareAnymore88 · Yesterday 07:28

UC will know if you are just doing the bare minimum.

In my day you just had to apply for a certain amount every week. It had the unfortunate effect of causing the scattergun approach to firing off job applications to anything however unsuitable. Do they do more to survey job seekers these days?

In any case I don't blame anyone for taking a realistic look at their prospects and doing what suits them.

EasternEcho · Yesterday 07:34

TyroneBarkleyManofValueNSOUL · Yesterday 07:28

The sarcasm of your post was missed.😁

Doesn't surprise me in the least :) You can't waste time and energy on those who want to be right rather than look at the evidence, and retort with a logical argument than attacks.

SoftIce · Yesterday 07:35

@lxn889121 Germany has a shortage of apprentices in trades, so that could be an option. You have to be at least B1 in German though to qualify for a vocational training visa, so in practice, for most people it isn't an option.

TooTiredToCareAnymore88 · Yesterday 07:35

WhatNoRaisins · Yesterday 07:33

In my day you just had to apply for a certain amount every week. It had the unfortunate effect of causing the scattergun approach to firing off job applications to anything however unsuitable. Do they do more to survey job seekers these days?

In any case I don't blame anyone for taking a realistic look at their prospects and doing what suits them.

Edited

It is pretty much still the same. It depends if you have a nice work coach or not.

Stressedoutmummyof3 · Yesterday 07:36

It's not easy. My DD was out of a work for over a year and I was really worried she was getting depressed. Luckily she got a job and although it seems steady, who knows?
My nephew's and nieces also struggled to get work, especially in their chosen field. I'm sick of people saying young people are lazy and there are plenty of jobs. I notice this is only said by people who are working or retired and don't have a young person at home applying for multiple jobs daily.
The answer though? I'm not sure. Perhaps supermarkets could help by getting rid of self serve checkouts and use some of their billions to employ staff. Perhaps companies could employ actual people instead of AI. Those things aren't going to happen and things are just going to get worse.

Theolittle · Yesterday 07:37

Newname26 · Yesterday 07:28

I don't think increasing retirement age is helping either.
Limited number of jobs, why encourage older people to stay in them not opening up space at the bottom of the ladder?

I know far too many young people with degrees under emoloyed working in pubs. Its crazy.

Because state pensions are one of the biggest drivers of the increases in “welfare” spending. We’re getting older and older. The triple lock is making things worse

Melarus · Yesterday 07:37

EasternEcho · Yesterday 07:24

Right. You have made an utterly compelling argument. It's the immigrants, and benefits. 👏

You could post about your guinea pig having a bad cold, and OneTealShaker would still find a way to blame it on people receiving benefits

Kpo58 · Yesterday 07:41

TyroneBarkleyManofValueNSOUL · Yesterday 07:21

Can see a lot of WFH jobs going once AI really gets going.

There was one IT company boss saying that AI in his company was going to replace low level estate within the company(workers)or words to that effect.
Iirc it was thousands of jobs

That IT boss is an idiot. As soon as you only have AI in place of low rung jobs, you will loose all those to do the upper rung jobs (as they retire or go into other sectors) as no-one will ever develop the skills needed to do them. Many places are stepping back from just AI for this very reason.

JacknDiane · Yesterday 07:43

MynameisnotJohn · Yesterday 07:27

I have three young adults all still at home. I do constantly remind them that there are always problems wherever in the world people live and they are massively lucky to live in a country that other people are desperate to live in.
I have nephews and nieces who have moved to Australia and the US. Mixed experiences. They are conflicted about staying away forever although seem to be doing better than the ones left behind.

Can you explain how they are doing better? Do you mean in terms of work or housing? Ds has many friends moving to Australia and im wondering how it actually is out there.

EasternStandard · Yesterday 07:43

EasternEcho · Yesterday 07:18

The irony of your post when I could say the same about the stock denial that comes out of those too lazy to apply critical thought. AI is not the same as automation. In simple terms, AI represents a fundamentally different economic shock than traditional automation. While past automation replaced routine physical labor, generative AI is disrupting cognitive and creative work, meaning the scale, speed, and types of jobs affected are entirely unprecedented.

Much of it is tax the extent of AI has fully been realised. But not being prepared for Ai uptick as this gov isn’t is another factor.

Backedoffhackedoff · Yesterday 07:44

MustTryHarderAndHarder · Yesterday 06:46

Yes that shouldn't have happened but it's done and can't be changed. But that doesn't mean that you make things worse by encouraging all the wealthy people to emigrate.

But Labour hates rich people so what do you expect.

This is such a poor persons view of rich people. Why would they be here if they can’t make money? It’s not the tax that means they don’t come.

dont forget the 20 years of being buffered up by Russian and Chinese investment came with a lot of corruption and fraud.

JiIttiIg · Yesterday 07:45

Oh wow, didn't expect the thread to take off overnight. I just don't see any politicians having real solutions, really not helped by AI. Will the UK end up like Ireland was for a long time where the young had to leave if they wanted a decent life?

OP posts:
Backedoffhackedoff · Yesterday 07:45

unfortunately I think we will become the Irish/ polish of the past and emigrate for work. Eastern Europe is booming, as is China and Saudi.

British people aren’t very adventurous (for obvious reasons) so I don’t know how long it’ll take for this to be commonplace

bluelikeidneverknown · Yesterday 07:46

Unfortunately as younger people are the demographic which vote the least, politicians are happy to consistently fob them off in favour of the elderly who are more likely to vote 🤷🏻‍♀️ the easiest step towards a solution would be for more young people to vote as it would force politicians to kick their arse into gear and care about them

GaurdRails · Yesterday 07:48

There are lots of factors involved in why young people are at a disadvantage in finding work. There was a Forbes report that said AI was automating basic entry level work, but also that WFH had affected first jobs too because employers are only going to take on experienced, mid-career people with a proven track record to work remotely.

There's also the outsourcing problem. Like the call centre shift to India which was a huge detriment to the service-based UK economy, we see the same in tech. India and Africa have large, highly educated and skilled, affordable workforces that undercut the UK, so the new jobs created in AI aren't necessarily going to be UK based jobs for young people.

People saying 'automation has always been progress' are only half correct. Automation (robotics) in factories generated more profits for a company but saw entry-level job loses, with the creation of fewer more highly skilled and better paid jobs like engineers.

To future proof against AI automation the choice for young people is to follow the money and train in tech, competing against other countries for specialised roles, or to go into essential but lowet paid people facing work like caring.

Swipe left for the next trending thread