Help end medical misogyny. Sign our petition.

Help end medical misogyny.
Sign our petition.

Sign the petition

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

AIBU to question recovering divers’ bodies

59 replies

SP2024 · 26/05/2026 21:55

The case of the divers who have perished underwater is very sad. The company clearly didn’t have the right equipment. Went too deep and couldn’t get back. However I can’t understand why they risked other lives - and someone did die - trying to recover the bodies. Why not leave them to nature like ship wrecks and those who fall overboard from the small boats? It surely cost loads as well. What am I not understanding?

OP posts:
Pansykavalier · 26/05/2026 23:02

There are literally hundreds of bodies left on Mount Everest. Although periodic attempts are made to recover them, many have been there for decades. Climbers literally pass some of them as they ascend and descend the mountain.

Tigerbalmshark · 26/05/2026 23:07

Pansykavalier · 26/05/2026 23:02

There are literally hundreds of bodies left on Mount Everest. Although periodic attempts are made to recover them, many have been there for decades. Climbers literally pass some of them as they ascend and descend the mountain.

Yep, very different ethos among climbers vs divers though. Climbers are all “lone adventurer, able to self-rescue”, and divers are very team-oriented, stick together, look after each other.

Climbers don’t have buddies who are expected to share their oxygen, bring each other back down the mountain etc. Whereas divers learn to rescue each other on day 1 - you literally can’t get your basic Padi card without doing a simulated lift to the surface with your buddy whilst sharing air.

PurpleAxe · 26/05/2026 23:21

Tigerbalmshark · 26/05/2026 23:07

Yep, very different ethos among climbers vs divers though. Climbers are all “lone adventurer, able to self-rescue”, and divers are very team-oriented, stick together, look after each other.

Climbers don’t have buddies who are expected to share their oxygen, bring each other back down the mountain etc. Whereas divers learn to rescue each other on day 1 - you literally can’t get your basic Padi card without doing a simulated lift to the surface with your buddy whilst sharing air.

This.

My life is routinely in my buddy's hands. And hers in mine.

It is OK that you don't get it. But rest assured there would have been an over abundance of volunteers.

Wauwinet · 26/05/2026 23:35

Tigerbalmshark · 26/05/2026 22:43

Nobody should be diving to 60m on air! Cave or not, it is ridiculously dangerous and if you want to dive that deep you need to go off and learn how to use trimix safely. Using air for a dive that deep is the equivalent of deciding to head down the M1 on a Lime scooter.

Add in “entering a cave without the right kit” and that is just the cherry on top of a very risky cake. It is baffling that a load of apparently experienced divers chose to do it, but once they did, it was highly likely there would be an accident of some sort.

Yes, that’s correct. My father is a technical diver with over 15,000 dives around the world including in deep water and caves. He’s been absolutely baffled by the decisions they made, especially with their experience.

Hence why the Italian government is conducting an investigation.

PercyPigsAreOverRated · 26/05/2026 23:46

There's a YouTube channel, DiveTalk, that talks about this kind of thing. It's really interesting.
I loved diving when I was younger, the idea terrifies me now!

TessSaysYes · 27/05/2026 00:01

You have a point.
But you underestimate the depth of skill, knowledge, and a sort of unreal devotion to wanting to help in tragic and rescue situations...there are really talented individuals who step forward to help. Dangerous for them for sure. But it makes the world a slightly better place, undoubtedly.
A cousin of mine was rescued from a deep cave in Ausrian Alps. He was surely deae, but for a group of amazing caving locals who put themselves in danger and saved his life.

bellsofnorwich · 27/05/2026 00:08

The company clearly didn’t have the right equipment. Went too deep and couldn’t get back.

That's not what I've read. From the Independent:

"The group entered a complex underwater cave in Vaavu Atoll at around 50m of depth on the morning of Thursday, a depth well beyond the permitted recreational diving limit of 30m."

I've read that the weather conditions were rough that day; they may have suffered "oxygen toxicity" from the oxygen/nitrogen mix; they may have taken a wrong turn; someone may have panicked...

It seems like they don't know what happened. Bringing them back helps determine how and why they died. And it's the humane thing to do, for them and for their families.

Grammarnut · 27/05/2026 00:11

Backedoffhackedoff · 26/05/2026 22:18

I genuinely don’t understand this point (communicated by yourself and a poster above in quits an abrupt offended way tbh) your DH wouldn’t have wanted a police officer to die recovering his sisters body just so he could have closure, would he?

No, her DH probably would not. But that is not the issue. The family cannot have a funeral for a DD. Every effort possible is made to recover bodies so that they can have a proper funeral. It's important and part of grief. Also, without a body there is the nagging worry/hope that death may not have occurred.

MidnightMeltdown · 27/05/2026 00:22

I imagine that it’s, at least in part, to try to establish what happened. They may learn something that could have implications for other divers, and there may be legal liability for what went wrong, and evidence needed.

MidnightMeltdown · 27/05/2026 00:24

It’s a bit like when there’s an aeroplane crash and investigators have to recover and examine what remains of the plane in order to establish what went wrong.

SP2024 · 27/05/2026 06:48

There are some good points about working out what happened, I hadn’t really thought of it that way. Also good to know the community is so strong and helping each other. I still wonder who paid for their flights, equipment etc. ?

OP posts:
EmeraldShamrock000 · 27/05/2026 06:52

i agree with you. A diver lost his life in the rescue mission.
Search and rescue shouldn’t have risked it.
Rescue missions that risk the lives of the crew should be exclusively used for live missions.
I would feel the same if it was me or my child down in the underwater cave.

followtheswallow · 27/05/2026 06:57

I don’t think anyone is suggesting we routinely just leave bodies. It’s only in cases where locating and moving the body would present such danger to others that this may be the most pragmatic choice. It’s awful for the families of course but broadly speaking I do agree with the OP.

Notmyreality · 27/05/2026 06:59

They do it to recover the bodies for burial to give family closure and also as part of the investigation into the cause of death to learn and to prevent reoccurrence. Despite your assertion in your OP no one knew exactly where they were or how or why they died. “The company clearly didn’t have the right equipment” is your ignorance talking and not true. No one is forced to go after them it’s voluntary.

SemperIdem · 27/05/2026 07:37

@Tigerbalmshark

That is very interesting to read. I’ve learned something there. I’ve wondered a little since this diving accident why there seems to be such a difference between climbers and divers and now I know.

Lostsadandconfused · 27/05/2026 07:49

The Finnish team volunteered to do it but it was not an overly difficult recovery with the right skills and equipment and planning.

They will always attempt to recover bodies in shipwrecks etc if it is possible. The MV St Thomas Aquinas ferry disaster in the Phillipines. Teams of divers worked under very difficult conditions to recover the bodies of the victims, many of them children. There are videos of the recovery dives on YouTube, it’s a hard watch. I’m sure their families were supremely grateful.

Notsosweetcaroline · 27/05/2026 07:53

I’m struggling to comprehend your focus on money here, you’re repeatedly asking.

if it was your child or spouse would you leave them down there, or would you want to give them a proper send off and understand what happened.

try to have some empathy and not focus on money.

Lostsadandconfused · 27/05/2026 07:57

MayaLui · 26/05/2026 22:24

Lots of reasons. Partly for the comfort of the family. It's hugely important for families to have a body to bury and to say goodbye to. It's also legally extremely complicated to have anyone declared dead without a body.

But probably the main reason is so we know what happened. We now have a pretty likely theory on what happened to the five divers who died, which is actually not what you said - they didn't have the right equipment and they did go too deep, but they died because they took a wrong turn in the cave because their correct path back was obscured by a sandbank. This is useful information that can serve as a warning to divers in future and helps us understand dangers, as well as fulfilling legal requirements in determining a cause of death at inquest. It also means we know it wasn't simple equipment failure which would have myriad safety implications.

I don’t really agree with you, they were dead the minute they decided to enter that cave. Even if they’d not gotten lost in the dead end (this is the prevailing current theory) they would have run out of air before they could make it out and back to the surface.

Lostsadandconfused · 27/05/2026 08:00

Notsosweetcaroline · 27/05/2026 07:53

I’m struggling to comprehend your focus on money here, you’re repeatedly asking.

if it was your child or spouse would you leave them down there, or would you want to give them a proper send off and understand what happened.

try to have some empathy and not focus on money.

I don’t think it’s unreasonable to wonder who funds this sort of rescue operation.

I read that they left in such a hurry they had to stop at a supermarket to buy shorts.

EmeraldShamrock000 · 27/05/2026 08:03

Notsosweetcaroline · 27/05/2026 07:53

I’m struggling to comprehend your focus on money here, you’re repeatedly asking.

if it was your child or spouse would you leave them down there, or would you want to give them a proper send off and understand what happened.

try to have some empathy and not focus on money.

They were all experienced divers who were highly educated. I’m sure they would have known how to check the equipment.
An investigation is crucial, to avoid further death but I don’t feel a body recovery mission is worth risking lives for under dangerous circumstances.
It’s not about money, it’s the secondary tragedy, a rescuer died trying to recover them.
If it was me, I’d rather be left there, in a place that I loved.

Tigerbalmshark · 27/05/2026 09:38

SemperIdem · 27/05/2026 07:37

@Tigerbalmshark

That is very interesting to read. I’ve learned something there. I’ve wondered a little since this diving accident why there seems to be such a difference between climbers and divers and now I know.

I do wonder if it is because recreational diving originated from WW2 Italian navy “frogmen” - there’s the whole armed forces “no man left behind” brothers-in-arms stuff. You wouldn’t be a very effective marine commando squad if you dumped your team-mates at the first sign of trouble! And then that has carried over into recreational diving.

Tigerbalmshark · 27/05/2026 09:43

EmeraldShamrock000 · 27/05/2026 08:03

They were all experienced divers who were highly educated. I’m sure they would have known how to check the equipment.
An investigation is crucial, to avoid further death but I don’t feel a body recovery mission is worth risking lives for under dangerous circumstances.
It’s not about money, it’s the secondary tragedy, a rescuer died trying to recover them.
If it was me, I’d rather be left there, in a place that I loved.

Edited

But did anyone know they had even gone into the cave until they recovered the bodies?

Up until the bodies were found, presumably they had just failed to return, and could have been anywhere? (Including surfaced away from the boat alive but lost)

HowDoYouSolveAProblemLikeMyRear · 27/05/2026 09:47

GrumpyInsomniac · 26/05/2026 22:27

@Backedoffhackedoff ODFOD.

Clearly he wouldn’t want someone to die, but try asking anyone in that situation whether they wouldn’t want every reasonable effort to be made and you’ll get the same answer.

It comes down to whether the risk is reasonable, and the diver has to make that call. In the meantime, I’m trying to work out a computer vision algorithm to identify human remains in deep water. Because that’s how much pain it has caused and there is currently no solution but divers.

I'm so sorry for your loss.

I admire your determination to do something so constructive.

GasPanic · 27/05/2026 09:54

I don't think it is something that rescue divers are forced into. It's something they do as part of their job, and as part of being a community, and maybe also what they would like to happen if an accident befell them. They are aware of the risks they undertake and the choice is their own.

Lostsadandconfused · 27/05/2026 11:48

Tigerbalmshark · 27/05/2026 09:43

But did anyone know they had even gone into the cave until they recovered the bodies?

Up until the bodies were found, presumably they had just failed to return, and could have been anywhere? (Including surfaced away from the boat alive but lost)

I assume someone knew that was their plan. Either a member of the boat crew or the 6th diver who pulled out at the last minute.

Swipe left for the next trending thread