Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To be absolutely sick of hearing about the cost of living crisis

909 replies

Katypp · 22/05/2026 08:59

I surely can't be the only person sick to death of hearing about the cost of living crisis?
I am tired of reporters interviewing middle-class (usually) mothers inside paid activities such as soft play and hearing them moan about how they are struggling to make ends meet.
Have we completely lost the ability to cut our cloth according to our means or does 'struggling' now mean carrying on spending as usual then complaining when there's no money left?
There have never been as many massive new cars on the road, towns are full of hairdressers, nail bars, brow bars, tanning salons, soft play, play cafes, coffee shops, ice cream parlours, dog groomers, most of which didn't exist 25 years ago and are probably the recipients of the money of the families who say they can't keep up with spiralling costs.
Yes, some families will have been hard up before prices started to go up and will have nothing else to cut back on. They have my sympathy.
But i am utterly fed up of hearing how hard households ars being hit by the cost of living crisis when all that's needed is a few minor cutbacks which they don't want to make.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
11
Sartre · 22/05/2026 14:29

seascacilimeadar · 22/05/2026 14:27

The Waitrose thing - you know it's mostly children who do the tokens, right? My children always pick up multiple tokens and put them in whatever the cutest option is. (Except we shop at Tesco.)

This is true. My DC’s primary was one of them once so every time we went in they’d put about 25 tokens in (their school won!).

TheKittenswithMittens · 22/05/2026 14:35

I have gone off a tangent, looking for Pete Townsend songs that might be pertinent.
My Generation. Generation X was actually first used about the early boomers. I.E. The Who's Generation.

MistressoftheDarkSide · 22/05/2026 14:36

SadTimesInFife · 22/05/2026 14:25

Plenty of [taxpayers'] money for tattoos, fags, smartphones, and booze.

And plenty of tax revenue generated by those industries. Your point is?

cupfinalchaos · 22/05/2026 14:36

IpsyUpsyDaisyDoos · 22/05/2026 12:43

I can see how it's come about. What's your passive aggressive statement about though? You clearly have a specific thing in mind?

There is nothing passive aggressive about my statement whatsoever. The uk is sadly turning into a welfare state. Surprisingly I doubt that sentiment aligns with your views which you of course too are welcome to share here.

ForWittyTealOP · 22/05/2026 14:37

BloominNora · 22/05/2026 13:51

You can't compare poverty and deprivation to 50 or 100 years ago though - you have to measure it on a relative basis in relation to what the majority deems to be a basic standard of living - unless you want to start claiming that people are only poor if they don't have an indoor toilet and running water!

In the early 20th century, poverty and living standards were defined in the 1942 Beveridge report which outlined the need to tackle the five giants to enable society to recover the ongoing ravages from the first world war and the ongoing ones of the second world war. The report formed the basis on the modern welfare and health system - the cradle to the grave safety net by tackling Want (by ensuring minimum income), Disease (universal healthcare), Ignorance (compulsory universal education), Squalor (suitable housing) and Idleness (employment and job creation).

In the 1970s Peter Townsend started to look at relative poverty and showed that poverty was much more widespread if the definition was based on living conditions and activities that are customary in society - and these things change over time.

In the early 1900's deprivation would have been things like no coat, poor nutrition, overcrowded housing.

In the 1970s it would have been poor diet, not being able to afford a TV or to go for a pint down the pub.

In the 21st century it is things like not having easy digital access or being able to afford to participate in social activities.

Today, the governments poverty stats measure those that have income that is 60% or less of median income after housing costs (rent or mortgage and water). These levels are:

Single adult with no children: approx. £176 per week (£9,152 annually)
Couple with no children: approx. £296 per week (£15,392 annually)
Couple with two children: approx. £547 per week (£28,444 annually)

Based on the Townsend relative deprivation model, poverty is defined as:

Not being able to undertake social activities: Cannot afford a week’s holiday away from home, or cannot invite friends/family over for a meal.
Not being able to meet basic dietary needs: Go without a cooked meal or fresh meat several days a week.
Not being able to mee basic household standards: Cannot afford to replace worn-out furniture or lack access to central heating and basic indoor amenities.

In 1997 33% of children lived in poverty with 25% living in deprivation
By 2008 it was 30% in poverty with 19% in deprivation.

Today childhood poverty remains at the 30% level, but deprivation has increased to 24%.

As a statistical measure childhood poverty has gotten no better in 18 years and relative deprivation has got worse. On top of that there has been a significant reduction in the availability and quality of public services and people's general satisfaction with life.

Studies show that the health and happiness of a population gets worse the bigger the gap between rich and poor.

Post war wealth inequality reduced before starting to increase in the 1980s. In the 1970s CEOs earned around 20 times the amount of a median earner. Today CEOs earn almost 80 times the amount of a median earner.

When you add to that the constant increase in share values and the increase in the number of billionaires which make owners and investors richer while wages stagnate.

It is easy to see how we have got to the position where the top 10% own over 50% of the countries wealth, the top 20% own 63% and the bottom 20% own just 0.5%!

Great post.

Also between 2010-24 the UK had no specific policy to prevent child poverty. That's shocking when you think about it, particularly in connection with the normalisation of poverty by the "austerity" policies of that time. No wonder some rail against the very provision of child related benefits and the idea that people might actually want to take their children on days out or holidays. We've been primed to believe that poverty looks like children with rickets.

OhThePotential · 22/05/2026 14:39

Octavia64 · 22/05/2026 09:38

I dunno where you live but where I live shops are shutting.

Yes - In the North East of Scotland formerly busy, thriving towns like Elgin and Huntly are almost completely boarded up and major employers in all sectors are announcing thousands of redundancies.

The city of Aberdeen is the same, shops shutting (when we lost John Lewis the surrounding area of shops also died) cinemas shutting, restaurants shutting. Even M&S has moved and downsized significantly. Only gyms, salons and jewellers seem to be doing well.

I am in my fifties, part of ‘the squeezed middle’ and all the above is starting to frighten me, if I’m honest.

To answer The OP’s question, no I’m not sick of hearing about it. It needs to be talked about more.

ForWittyTealOP · 22/05/2026 14:40

Passaggressfedup · 22/05/2026 13:47

I blame the parents then!
Of course you, always the fault of others....

As it is, my kids are learning that if they want more, they'll have to work even harder and move up the ladder which is exactly what they are doing.

I guess the problem is that the link between hard work and economic success is increasingly being seen for the myth or, at best, partial truth that it's always been. Hard work alone doesn't guarantee a roof over your head or enough to eat. And even if it did, the basics of life shouldn't depend on your ability to "work hard" - lots will never be able to do that. They really are a baseline below which nobody should fall.

ForWittyTealOP · 22/05/2026 14:42

TheKittenswithMittens · 22/05/2026 13:54

We also import poverty

What does that mean?

MistressoftheDarkSide · 22/05/2026 14:42

OhThePotential · 22/05/2026 14:39

Yes - In the North East of Scotland formerly busy, thriving towns like Elgin and Huntly are almost completely boarded up and major employers in all sectors are announcing thousands of redundancies.

The city of Aberdeen is the same, shops shutting (when we lost John Lewis the surrounding area of shops also died) cinemas shutting, restaurants shutting. Even M&S has moved and downsized significantly. Only gyms, salons and jewellers seem to be doing well.

I am in my fifties, part of ‘the squeezed middle’ and all the above is starting to frighten me, if I’m honest.

To answer The OP’s question, no I’m not sick of hearing about it. It needs to be talked about more.

Edited

Snap x and I'm on the "affluent" South coast.

Our town has recently acquired a Reform Mayor. Whelp.

TheKittenswithMittens · 22/05/2026 14:43

So without the triple lock, many pensioners would fall into relative poverty. Yet, so many on here want it scrapped.

ForWittyTealOP · 22/05/2026 14:45

cupfinalchaos · 22/05/2026 14:36

There is nothing passive aggressive about my statement whatsoever. The uk is sadly turning into a welfare state. Surprisingly I doubt that sentiment aligns with your views which you of course too are welcome to share here.

The UK has been a welfare state for almost 80 years now. What's the matter, don't you like our NHS or state school provision?

smooththecat · 22/05/2026 14:47

Crikeyalmighty · 22/05/2026 13:25

I partly disagree on that - ‘some’ country’s do - but often those country’s are very expensive on other things too , USA and Australia as examples - when we lived in Denmark the pay wasn’t ‘much’ higher than UK on comparable jobs, minimum wage was similar and tax much higher with next to no tax free allowances - - the big difference though was no council tax, no NI good childcare at £250 a month from babies upwards , lots of good quality social housing, utilities slightly less and an expectation that in a couple both worked unless totally unable to do so and as near as full time as possible across all income spectrums. There were a lot more proper dual income households, a lot less bit of part time - because the gvt put the money into childcare .im not saying that’s good or bad , but that’s how it worked- far less benefits needed too as plenty of Danish single mums and families had very good social housing if on modest incomes. Complete with lovely little play parks, well kept public areas, well connected public transport, tons of nursery’s on tap -

I agree with the sentiment and my post was a bit glib. The problem is that policy decisions and ideology have left us between two worlds, we have neither the higher earnings of the richer countries nor the social structures to support us such as those you describe. We end up with a huge, huge bill for in work benefits. That’s where our money is going, supporting people in work. The whole argument that goes on politically, in the media, on here is entirely missing the point.

TB23 · 22/05/2026 14:49

To be honest, I am far more fed up with the politics, incompetence and mismanagement that have caused the very real cost of living crisis. Average people shouldn't have to cut back and be worse off than their parents' generation. Brexit, the mismanagement and corruption during the pandemic, the mindless proliferation of AI and subsequent job losses, the apparent inability of large corporations to curb their profits and pass on price decreases etc - that's all more worthwhile to get upset about than people who are quite rightly angry and frustrated by price increases massively outstripping pay increases.

smooththecat · 22/05/2026 14:50

TheKittenswithMittens · 22/05/2026 14:43

So without the triple lock, many pensioners would fall into relative poverty. Yet, so many on here want it scrapped.

A triple lock on f all is still f all. The whole triple lock debate misses the point that our pensions are extremely low. That is the problem that must be addressed.

ForWittyTealOP · 22/05/2026 14:55

TheKittenswithMittens · 22/05/2026 14:43

So without the triple lock, many pensioners would fall into relative poverty. Yet, so many on here want it scrapped.

Would they? Is there nothing more targeted that could be put into place? I read an article by Zoe Williams yesterday where she says,

Why, when pension benefits and the state pension amount to £178bn annually – which is greater than the housing benefit, disability benefit and unemployment or low-income benefits bills combined – do we never talk about the triple lock?

It wouldn't be beyond the wit of policy makers to decide something that would be better value for money. Now the two party system has fractured, which political party depends on the pensioner vote so much that it would be expedient to keep it?

EarthlyNightshade · 22/05/2026 14:59

I'd like to hear more about it - it's an issue that needs to be addressed somehow. And it is really happening despite what the OP thinks.

So you can only go to softplay once a month instead of weekly, not long before the softplay closes. People who own or work in softplay now have no jobs - how do they cut their cloth? Get other jobs? The standard "go work in a care home" line will no doubt be wheeled out.

Wanting everyone to spend less and shut up will affect everyone in the long-term.
People shouldn't have to be on the poverty line to be allowed to complain that a meal out for a family of 4 now costs £100 instead of £50, or whatever small piece of joy their lives formerly held, and they are now being told that they should simply be glad they don't have rickets!

Sunshap · 22/05/2026 15:00

@Katypp I spent several years at university and now in a job paying almost 6 figures. Taking into account repaying the student loans and the extortionate costs required to buy a home, I struggle. Nobody should be struggling on the top percentage of income so for anyone paid less than this, it must be horrendous. It’s ok to complain about that!

ladyrinths · 22/05/2026 15:04

Now the two party system has fractured, which political party depends on the pensioner vote so much that it would be expedient to keep it?

Demographically they are a huge block so all parties play to them.

ladyrinths · 22/05/2026 15:07

The whole triple lock debate misses the point that our pensions are extremely low. That is the problem that must be addressed.

Which pensions are you comparing to? State pensions in other countries? Not comparable. For one there are far fewer private pensions with people & employers paying more into that state system.

We also don’t base pensions on contributions, it’s a flat rate & lower & middle earners do not pay the same level of tax vs other countries.

To pay in what a pensioner gets out you are going to have to be on 50k for some time. Most people don’t earn this so when demographics change the pension benefits become a drag on the economy.

PersephonePomegranate · 22/05/2026 15:08

Katypp · 22/05/2026 09:11

You have completely missed my point.
I have every sympathy with people who are genuinely struggling. I have said that.

So basically, you're saying that only people on tbe breadline have the right to be annoyed?

DeftGoldHedgehog · 22/05/2026 15:08

I'm not sick of hearing about it. I'm sick of there being a cost of living crisis, which is largely driven by greed of the few, and their ability to chisel more money out of the many.

I will never forget that energy prices doubled in 2022.

BrownBookshelf · 22/05/2026 15:09

Mangelwurzelfortea · 22/05/2026 12:48

No idea what a cistern of living is...but you do realise that Manchester Airport is not a microcosm for the whole of the UK? The people there are by definition people who can afford to go on holiday.

Mmm, that poster is describing places that only contain people with disposable income! Even then, no way of knowing whether people who used to go for a fortnight have had to cut back to 10 days and so on.

IpsyUpsyDaisyDoos · 22/05/2026 15:10

cupfinalchaos · 22/05/2026 14:36

There is nothing passive aggressive about my statement whatsoever. The uk is sadly turning into a welfare state. Surprisingly I doubt that sentiment aligns with your views which you of course too are welcome to share here.

You have no idea of my views or anything about me...speculating on how mine are likely "sadly" not like yours is bizarre.

It was passive aggressive to simply state "you might want to think about why that is" instead of giving your actual views. Especially when all I said was that as we've worked hard for our standard of living, we're allowed to be annoyed that we can't keep it up. When we're working just as hard as we were before, if not harder.

You might want to consider WHY the UK is becoming a welfare state. The encouragement from previous governments (looking at you Mrs Thatcher) to spend on credit and cease manufacturing for ourselves, buying into the immediate gratification principles are where it all started. People want this for nothing these days. And those of us who work for what we have, and receive nothing in any form of benefits outside of the NHS and state education (which, we pay for in large amounts of tax) are the ones who see our incomes stay static while our costs rise.

Enough of a view for you?

whatistheworld · 22/05/2026 15:10

TheCountessofFitzdotterel · 22/05/2026 09:10

The gap between the rich and poor is widening.
The fact there are massive new cars on the street just tells you some people are doing well, it doesn’t say anything about how easy it is for normal people.

exactly this!! The gap between rich and poor is massive and getting bigger! in my SE town it is very obvious.
There are loads of new cars, restaurants packed, mums that gym and shop while kids are at school and there are increasing numbers of food banks/ charity hubs to provide for those that struggle to eat.

Its actually disgusting

WhenTheDustSettles · 22/05/2026 15:14

OneMoreTimeBaby · 22/05/2026 09:07

As the GC said “don’t worry”

And children will get free bus travel in August!

free bus in July and August would save me around £50, that would be more useful!

but who cares!

if everyone could just stop moaning so the OP can keep themselves oblivious please!

I shall go cut some more of my cloth…..

Gemma Collins?

Swipe left for the next trending thread