Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Thread gallery
9
ThreadGuardDog · Yesterday 19:50

AniahJeremiah · Yesterday 19:37

Well, murder, serial killing and crime in general reached an epidemic in the 70s when the boomers reached young adulthood and started declining in the 90s when boomers started to become too old to commit violent crimes easily. Take from that what you will about that generation.

You conveniently forgot to mention that research of the time and since, highlighted that the heavy use of leaded petrol in the mid-20th century exposed millions of children to neurotoxins linked to behavioural and impulse-control issues. As lead was phased out in the 1970s, it led to lower delinquency rates by roughly two decades later.

Another major factor is that the legalisation of abortion in the 1970s resulted in fewer unwanted births and children raised in unstable environments, significantly reducing the numbers of ‘at risk’ youth by the 1990s And the 980’s and 90’s saw a massive increase in the size of police forces and stricter laws leading to more crimes attracting jail time, which removed high rate offenders from the streets.

Differentforgirls · Yesterday 19:50

ThreadGuardDog · Yesterday 19:43

I’m a boomer. Distinctly remember the bombed out buildings that were everywhere for a very very long time after the end of WW2. They were a constant reminder, as were the frequent historical TV documentaries of the time. Conscription didn’t end until the mid 1960s and those who had served could, and frequently were, called up to other conflicts.

It’s only on MN I’ve ever encountered the opinion that we were all self centred shitbags who had everything we could possibly want handed to us on a plate. Everything is relative. Housing costs were a lot lower, so was the cost of living. But then so were wages. And it’s often forgotten that the changes in the law leading to things like maternity leave and pay, workplace pension provision for women, better childcare provision etc, were pioneered by my generation. Most of us, like myself were just trying to do the best we could in the economic climate of the day.

👏👏

BIossomtoes · Yesterday 19:53

ThreadGuardDog · Yesterday 19:50

You conveniently forgot to mention that research of the time and since, highlighted that the heavy use of leaded petrol in the mid-20th century exposed millions of children to neurotoxins linked to behavioural and impulse-control issues. As lead was phased out in the 1970s, it led to lower delinquency rates by roughly two decades later.

Another major factor is that the legalisation of abortion in the 1970s resulted in fewer unwanted births and children raised in unstable environments, significantly reducing the numbers of ‘at risk’ youth by the 1990s And the 980’s and 90’s saw a massive increase in the size of police forces and stricter laws leading to more crimes attracting jail time, which removed high rate offenders from the streets.

It’s not true anyway.

ThreadGuardDog · Yesterday 19:54

AniahJeremiah · Yesterday 19:50

It's normal for 20% to be economically inactive. Housewives, early pensioners (below state pension but early enough to claim), some self employed are essentially considered this if not doing so well, students. Also lots of boomers who make money off property speculation, no need for them to work is there.

Is the age bracket 16+ or 18+? Because if 16+ vast majority of 16-17 will be economically inactive for tax purposes. The vast majority of 16-17 who work on top of school aren't taxed and rightfully so, they only make a few thousand and work weekends on top of school.

What are ‘early pensioners’ please ? You can’t, and never have been able to claim state pension until you reach the prescribed age.

AniahJeremiah · Yesterday 19:55

Katypp · Yesterday 19:48

Complete nonsense.
The pension is going to disappear in 20 years or so? Engage brain.
You are right - young people have no money. They never have any money. There is nothing unique about today's young families having no money. It was ever thus.
So who is going to bail your generation out then?
Because on one hand there is baying for pensioners to be punished for relying on the state pension, yet on the other you are excusing younger people for not making any of their own arrangements.

Thick or just ignorant?

Young people have not always been poorer. In the 80s young people on average were more likely to own a home than over 55s. No coincidence that the young people then were BOOMERS (a common thread that runs) and the old people were ww2 veterans and their spouses, largely empoverished and deserving of the elderly discounts they never received but their bratty children did (Winter Fuel Allowance, Triple Lock, Free bus passes)

In 2000 over 55s owned 55% of the GDP and now is closer to 80%. Likewise for under 35s it was once closer to 40% of the GDP now closer to 10%.

FWIW I am 35 with two kids not some stroppy teenager. The "young" milennials now include the borderline middle aged with families.

AniahJeremiah · Yesterday 19:56

ThreadGuardDog · Yesterday 19:54

What are ‘early pensioners’ please ? You can’t, and never have been able to claim state pension until you reach the prescribed age.

Rich people taking our their private pensions before state pension age.

Differentforgirls · Yesterday 19:56

AniahJeremiah · Yesterday 19:47

Most of history people have been more fortunate than their parents. When they have been less fortunate, it has been to a long term change in living conditions (e.g. early industrialisation in the 1810s which actually worsened conditions for the working class in the short term, before improving them in the long term by the late 1800s), and so the people before them also did not do better than their parents. The boomers are the ONLY group to do vastly better than both their parents and kids.

BTW, by saying your parents were boomers, you are saying they were born after WW2, correct? That would mean you are a teenage pregnancy baby, which is nothing to be ashamed of, but a lot of people misuse the word to just mean, "old", when it doesn't, in fact the people born during and before the war are some of the best to ever live, and gave us all the social benefits and reforms of the 20th century. Especially those born before the war.

Also BTW fwiw '63 barely counts as boomer. Although a lot of people born around them still behave in that obnoxious way. It depends. And in my experience most of boomers entitled behaviour comes from being children of WW2 vets who gave them everything due to being traumatised wanted them to have lives they didn't have, so wouldn't apply to you if your parents genuinely are boomers.

No they both went through the war as children. I wasn't a teenage pregnancy baby. My parents were married when they had me but they had three of us when my mum was 22 and my dad was 23.

Badbadbunny · Yesterday 19:57

ThreadGuardDog · Yesterday 19:54

What are ‘early pensioners’ please ? You can’t, and never have been able to claim state pension until you reach the prescribed age.

No, but there are ever increasing numbers of people either taking early retirement from occupational pension schemes (or personal pension plans) or simply opting out of work and living on savings (or inheritances or a partner) for the intervening years until state pension age.

By "opting out", they're not paying income tax/NIC on wages, and not contributing to the economy via work productivity etc thus contributing to the stagnant/falling GDP. In the case of certain professions/occupations such as within the NHS there is the knock on effect of causing staff shortages and thus delaying services, i.e. increasing NHS waiting lists etc., which in turn means more people unable to work etc.

AniahJeremiah · Yesterday 19:58

Differentforgirls · Yesterday 19:56

No they both went through the war as children. I wasn't a teenage pregnancy baby. My parents were married when they had me but they had three of us when my mum was 22 and my dad was 23.

Edited

Aye, so they are silent generation, not boomers.

Badbadbunny · Yesterday 19:59

AniahJeremiah · Yesterday 19:56

Rich people taking our their private pensions before state pension age.

Define "rich"? Lots of pretty normal people take early retirement from private pensions, occupational pensions or public sector pensions. It's certainly not the preserve of the "rich" when people such as police, firemen, nurses, council bin-men, teachers, etc retire many years before state pension age.

Papyrophile · Yesterday 20:06

AniahJeremiah · Yesterday 19:33

Do you seriously think a healthy society people's finances are based on parental donations not their own work

If this is the case why work at all, live on UC, your parents money will always dwarf yours so why not. And their gifts exceed your salary lost SLC repayment so why not!

You just look worse.

Frankly, I think boomers like it this way because it makes them powerful, and they have sovereignty over their adult children's futures not whoever they're working for

Edited

I don't think that at all. I make decisions about major financial choices based on what I think are likely to achieve the best result for the people I want to benefit from my work. I prefer to decide that myself, rather than leaving the decisions to politicians.

I think my DC is going to have to work for another 40 years to get to pension age. Quite relaxed about that demand; we worked all those years too. But right now, we have enough in the pot to pay for a secure home. So that is what we are doing.

Apprentice26 · Yesterday 20:11

Badbadbunny · Yesterday 19:59

Define "rich"? Lots of pretty normal people take early retirement from private pensions, occupational pensions or public sector pensions. It's certainly not the preserve of the "rich" when people such as police, firemen, nurses, council bin-men, teachers, etc retire many years before state pension age.

If you can afford to stop working, you’re rich.

Papyrophile · Yesterday 20:17

Badbadbunny · Yesterday 19:59

Define "rich"? Lots of pretty normal people take early retirement from private pensions, occupational pensions or public sector pensions. It's certainly not the preserve of the "rich" when people such as police, firemen, nurses, council bin-men, teachers, etc retire many years before state pension age.

DH and I are not rich. We have been self employed for 35 years. During those 35 years, nobody has put a penny in my pension, except me. Neither of us has had sick pay, even during the months of recovery after DH's heart attack. My maternity leave was six weeks, at IIRC about £90 pw. Every single pound we have accumulated over 35 years of work has been earned. I have very very carefully created a pension fund, within all the rules, and now the Chancellor is proposing to scalp it.

Papyrophile · Yesterday 20:20

We're 70 if that helps, and still working.

DrRylandGrace · Yesterday 20:23

Differentforgirls · Yesterday 19:56

No they both went through the war as children. I wasn't a teenage pregnancy baby. My parents were married when they had me but they had three of us when my mum was 22 and my dad was 23.

Edited

Silent generation. They had integrity.

Completely different to current retirees of whom the vast majority are Boomers and did not live through the second world war and instead lived through the longest period of prosperity and peace that any generation has experienced to date.

Papyrophile · Yesterday 20:30

Apprentice26 · Yesterday 19:33

So then again, you’re going to cause an enormous divide again - between those whose parents are actually decent human beings and pay forward the inheritance probably like we did in the Victorian times consider the money to be family money that needs to stay in the family
Versus those who don’t
And if you’re in one of those families who feel absolutely no moral obligation to forward the money that our grandparents actually really did work their fingers to the Bone for, then those young people are going to be screwed.

I really don't care. I am looking after my kid. Your child is your responsibility. Frankly, I want my DC to have a secure home that no one can take away. DC has skills and talents that will provide a living but perhaps not enough to pay rent too.

crossedlines · Yesterday 20:31

This venom towards boomers would be hilarious if it wasn’t so pathetic!

Papyrophile · Yesterday 20:41

DrRylandGrace · Yesterday 20:23

Silent generation. They had integrity.

Completely different to current retirees of whom the vast majority are Boomers and did not live through the second world war and instead lived through the longest period of prosperity and peace that any generation has experienced to date.

That's a bit snide. My grandparents were the silent generation, born in the 1910-20. My in laws were born in 1929 and 1930. My DM was born in 1935. They are all dead now, except my dad who is 92 and does not remember anything about his first family. I'm his oldest child, and he thinks I'm his younger sister. But he also thinks his wife of almost 50 years is his daughter. Dementia is very cruel.

DrRylandGrace · Yesterday 20:43

Papyrophile · Yesterday 20:41

That's a bit snide. My grandparents were the silent generation, born in the 1910-20. My in laws were born in 1929 and 1930. My DM was born in 1935. They are all dead now, except my dad who is 92 and does not remember anything about his first family. I'm his oldest child, and he thinks I'm his younger sister. But he also thinks his wife of almost 50 years is his daughter. Dementia is very cruel.

I’m so sorry to hear this.

However, I’m not sure what it has to do with what I said, or how it makes my comment “snide”.

BIossomtoes · Yesterday 20:48

Papyrophile · Yesterday 20:41

That's a bit snide. My grandparents were the silent generation, born in the 1910-20. My in laws were born in 1929 and 1930. My DM was born in 1935. They are all dead now, except my dad who is 92 and does not remember anything about his first family. I'm his oldest child, and he thinks I'm his younger sister. But he also thinks his wife of almost 50 years is his daughter. Dementia is very cruel.

Your grandparents were Greatest generation as were my parents. We’re roughly the same age and your grandparents were born in the same era as my parents.

Papyrophile · Yesterday 20:50

Apologies, @DrRylandGrace. Poorly judged, and a badly worded comment. You have not said anything I disagree with. But you are right: dementia is horrible.

DrRylandGrace · Yesterday 20:50

What has been notable is that despite the multiple personal attacks that have taken place (not directed at @Papyrophile , just to be clear, because that was the last comment I responded to I’m sure some are so hard of thinking they’d assume I was referring to this poster and I am not, as her comment was perfectly reasonable I just don’t understand the relevance to what I’d said so have queried this, but this was not a personal attack from her at all) NOT ONE of the posters making the personal attacks calling me “psychotic” or “spiteful” or whatever else has actually bothered to respond at all to my post earlier this afternoon at 13:40 (a detailed explanation of what steps I’d take most immediately to address the UK’s economic issues, as was demanded) let alone put forward an alternative explaining how they’d fix the problems in the UK economy and put forward an alternative prospectus of economic policies that they believe would mean that productivity and living standards would rise.

It seems that there is little interest at all in even discussing proposed solutions, only insulting and disparaging people even if they are complete strangers on the internet and making up things to try to discredit them: no engagement whatsoever with any kind of economic discussion about ways to improve things. Very depressing, and precisely why the UK economy is screwed.

DrRylandGrace · Yesterday 20:51

Papyrophile · Yesterday 20:50

Apologies, @DrRylandGrace. Poorly judged, and a badly worded comment. You have not said anything I disagree with. But you are right: dementia is horrible.

It is the worst illness of all in my opinion. It robs someone of themself and all of their memories.

PhaedraTwo · Yesterday 20:52

AniahJeremiah · Yesterday 19:28

There is nothing good to be said about them.

Not content with out earning their parents and stealing all the council housing for a lower than market price (right to buy), selling council housing to private landlords, preventing new housing being built and buying investment properties for their own greed, they now have forced the government to subsidise them as by far the richest demographic in the country through triple lock (BTW, when the news talks about rising welfare bill, this is the vast majority of it) at the expense of everyone else, most of all young people thru student loan interest another con. I really hope enough young people leave the country to teach them a lesson. For many it will be the only way to avoid poverty. I (35) will never see state pension. Of course young people are to blame as well for not voting. Vicious boomers + apathetic, useless milennials = social collapse.

They're collapsing society thru their greed as nobody affording a house = nobody having children.

It's a shame COVID killed all the old people born before the war, who were miles better; knew the value of duty, sacrifice, and working on behalf of others.

Although from what I hear statistically, the boomers don't take care of their health very well, and are actually dying sooner than the prewar born generations. Maybe once their assets pass thru inheritance that will be many people's retirement plans?

For the record before ppl come at me this is about groups not individuals. My parents are boomers and I love them to bits and I love many boomers in my life... But the collective political behaviour of that group is one of a vicious, selfish, spoiled teenager who's never been told no.

What a nasty, spiteful post, full of sweeping generalisations.

Apprentice26 · Yesterday 20:55

Papyrophile · Yesterday 20:30

I really don't care. I am looking after my kid. Your child is your responsibility. Frankly, I want my DC to have a secure home that no one can take away. DC has skills and talents that will provide a living but perhaps not enough to pay rent too.

I dont care about your parents 🤷‍♀️

Swipe left for the next trending thread